On 10:30 Wed 12 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:48 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > Hi Hal,
> >
> > On 10:41 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm not close that 'all ports' simulation in perfquery is great thing.
> > >
> > > In a
Hi Sasha,
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 17:48 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> Hi Hal,
>
> On 10:41 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm not close that 'all ports' simulation in perfquery is great thing.
> >
> > In a sense, it's no different than what the agent itself might be doing;
Hi Hal,
On 10:41 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >
> > I'm not close that 'all ports' simulation in perfquery is great thing.
>
> In a sense, it's no different than what the agent itself might be doing;
> albeit over a larger time span.
>
> > perfquery is low level tool and it should b
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:56 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 16:46 Tue 11 Dec , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > On 07:25 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:27 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > > > On 06:57 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > > > On Tu
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 07:25 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:27 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > > On 06:57 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > >
On 16:46 Tue 11 Dec , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 07:25 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:27 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > > On 06:57 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > > > > For C
On 07:25 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:27 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > On 06:57 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > > > For CAs query performance counters only for single ports by lid a
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:27 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 06:57 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > > For CAs query performance counters only for single ports by lid and port
> > > number, and not whole node with 'all ports
On 06:57 Tue 11 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> > For CAs query performance counters only for single ports by lid and port
> > number, and not whole node with 'all ports' option.
>
> Should the description also reference the bug # ?
I
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:46 +, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> For CAs query performance counters only for single ports by lid and port
> number, and not whole node with 'all ports' option.
Should the description also reference the bug # ?
Will a similar thing be done to the other diag scripts whic
10 matches
Mail list logo
