Johann George wrote:
I should be able to make this, but as soon as you start pushing sessions
before noon, time should probably be made for lunch.
Perhaps we can include a working lunch for the developers who want to
and are able to meet earlier and discuss these issues?
We can, but I prefer
Dror Goldenberg wrote:
a) it's an option that is turned off by default and people that are
willing to take the risk can turn it on and get better performance
b) indeed we will need to make it work with the kernel lso, no need to
have something specific for ipoib
Anyway, I am planning to
Roland Dreier wrote:
As I said earlier on this thread, the open issues I see with the stateless
offload series are (A) the non interoperable checksum offload patch based on
the IB ICRC sent by Michael (and if it is inter-operable, I'd like to be
educated how)
For (A): as far as I'm
Dror Goldenberg wrote:
Or Gerlitz wrote:
On 11/5/07, *Roland Dreier* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
12-1: IPoIB stateless offload issues
a) it's an option that is turned off by default and people that are
willing to take the risk can turn it on and get better
11-12: SA cache session
12-1: IPoIB stateless offload issues
Sean, Roland, Dror - can you make it?
I should be able to make this, but as soon as you start pushing sessions
before noon, time should probably be made for lunch.
___
ewg mailing list
On 11/6/07, Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11-12: SA cache session
12-1: IPoIB stateless offload issues
Sean, Roland, Dror - can you make it?
I should be able to make this, but as soon as you start pushing sessions
before noon, time should probably be made for lunch.
So what is
I think Roland will not be on the 2nd day (Friday)
Maybe we need to switch this session to Thursday - Johann is this possible?
Are you referring to the IPoIB Stateless Offloads session? Yes. I
can move that to Thursday.
Johann
___
ewg mailing list
Johann George wrote:
There was mixed reaction to coming earlier on Thursday or
staying later on Friday. If a particular group is available
and would like to hold a discussion during either of these
times, let me know and we'll try to make the room available.
I suggest that the Linux IB
On 11/5/07, Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11-12: SA cache session
12-1: IPoIB stateless offload issues
Sean, Roland, Dror - can you make it?
I guess I can make it but what are the stateless offload issues? If
we want to spend an hour on it I think we need to figure out what if
As I said earlier on this thread, the open issues I see with the stateless
offload series are (A) the non interoperable checksum offload patch based on
the IB ICRC sent by Michael (and if it is inter-operable, I'd like to be
educated how) (B) LRO - a pure SW optimization, why it need to
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 01:51:58PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
As I said earlier on this thread, the open issues I see with the stateless
offload series are (A) the non interoperable checksum offload patch based
on
the IB ICRC sent by Michael (and if it is inter-operable, I'd like to
Roland Dreier wrote:
As I said earlier on this thread, the open issues I see with the stateless
offload series are (A) the non interoperable checksum offload patch based on
the IB ICRC sent by Michael (and if it is inter-operable, I'd like to be
educated how) (B) LRO - a pure SW
12 matches
Mail list logo
