-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 5:12 PM
To: Erez Zilber
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin; Steve Wise; Vladimir Sokolovsky;
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4]: add kfifo from upstream for SLES9 RH4
The
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
With SRC:
O(N ^ 2 * J)
This is achived by using a single send queue (per job, out of O(N * J)
jobs)
to send data to all J jobs running on a specific node (out of O(N)
nodes).
Hardware
Quoting Gleb Natapov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: Scalable reliable connection
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:50:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
With SRC:
O(N ^ 2 * J)
This is achived by using a single send queue (per job, out of O(N * J)
jobs)
to send
OFED July 30 meeting summary
1. Decided to have only one release in August - OFED 1.2.c.
Main reasons are - focus of all companies and saving the verification
and QA efforts.
2. Bugzilla: Everybody is requested to review the non-closed bugs and
decide what is the
Erez Zilber wrote:
Does 1.2.c-9 also include FMR support? Else, should we wait for 1.2.c-10?
FMRs are not supported in 1.2.c-9.
1.2.c-10 supports FMRs and it will be available tomorrow
Tziporet
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Tziporet,
Does 1.2.c-9 also include FMR support? Else, should we wait for 1.2.c-10?
Thanks,
Erez
Tziporet Koren wrote:
Hi All,
OFED 1.2.c-9 is available now on the OFA server under:
_http://www.openfabrics.org/builds/connectx/release/_
Note: this release was tested with FW 2.1.000
Tziporet Koren wrote:
1.2.c-10 supports FMRs and it will be available tomorrow
thats very important progress re iser support since unlike srp we can't
work without fmr. When are you planning to send the mlx4 FMR code to
review on the general list? I guess this is code candidate for 2.6.24,
A send queue can only serve max J jobs within a node. Is it possible to
make a single send queue to serve all jobs on all nodes ?
--CQ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael S. Tsirkin
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:51 AM
To:
Quoting Tang, Changqing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: RE: Scalable reliable connection
A send queue can only serve max J jobs within a node. Is it possible to
make a single send queue to serve all jobs on all nodes ?
How do you propose to do this?
--
MST
In this way, only one send queue is needed for each job(process), and we
don't need to track the location of each other job(which is on which
node).
from a job point of view, either self, or others, all others are
equal...
--CQ
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
On 7/12/07, Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
OFED 1.2.c-9 is available now on the OFA server under:
http://www.openfabrics.org/builds/connectx/release/
Note: this release was tested with FW 2.1.000 that will soon be available on
Mellanox web site for download.
Supported
Guys,
I have 2 more patches to go in ofed_1_2/ofed_1_2_c.
Is there some grand scheme to the naming of kernel_patches/fixes/* for
1.2.c? I noticed a slew of new files for the post-2.6.22 fixes, and
wondered if there is a naming scheme?
Or should I just post a patch for the ofed_1_2 branch
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
- ibstat does not present all entries. Use ibv_devinfo instead.
What is missing from ibstat for ConnectX ? What entries are missing ?
See in the report below.
If you can fix it it will be great
Tziporet
# ibstat
CA 'mlx4_0'
CA type:
CA type: === missing
Firmware version:=== missing
Hardware version:=== missing
These need sysfs entries from the mlx4_ib driver, I guess.
___
ewg mailing list
Roland Dreier wrote:
CA type: === missing
Firmware version:=== missing
Hardware version:=== missing
These need sysfs entries from the mlx4_ib driver, I guess.
I think we have them but under drivers/net
On 7/31/07, Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Dreier wrote:
CA type: === missing
Firmware version:=== missing
Hardware version:=== missing
These need sysfs entries from the mlx4_ib
Why under drivers/net rather than drivers/infiniband like all the
other drivers ? Does this really need special casing (in libibumad) ?
Tziporet is incorrect. There's nothing from the mlx4_core driver
either, and when it is implemented, it should work exactly the same as
all other drivers.
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: patches for 1.2.c
Guys,
I have 2 more patches to go in ofed_1_2/ofed_1_2_c.
Is there some grand scheme to the naming of kernel_patches/fixes/* for
1.2.c? I noticed a slew of new files for the post-2.6.22 fixes, and
wondered if there is
Quoting Erez Zilber [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] IB/iser: move open-iscsi crypto functions to
kernel_addons
The following patches move open-iscsi crypto functions from kernel_patches to
kernel_addons. By doing so, we also solve a bug in iscsi tx hash that caused
an oops when
Quoting Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: OFED 1.2.c-9 is available
Why under drivers/net rather than drivers/infiniband like all the
other drivers ? Does this really need special casing (in libibumad) ?
Tziporet is incorrect. There's nothing from the
20 matches
Mail list logo
