On 10/10/07, Or Gerlitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vlad,
Opening a bug on the ofa bugzilla whose component is RDS results in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] being assigned to it ...
I understand it should be assigned to you? if yes, can you fix it?
For the mean time I have re-assigned the two RDS
Kernels prior to 2.6.24 have problems with multiple devices sharing the same
location code on ppc64 systems -- only one of these devices would be usable
by ibmebus. This will be a problem on systems with multiple eHCA chips on a
single hardware location.
For older kernels, this problem can be
cheapnewsoft . com
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
(Assuming that the allocation of slots within the schedule to have
enough time for Linux IB developers to discuss what ever they decide
they need to would be taken care of) I'd like to check with people what
we want to be on the agenda of these slots. My thinking for issues to
discuss was:
Friendly reminder: the OFED teleconference today Monday (29 Oct, 2007).
All are at noon US eastern / 9am US Pacific / -=6pm Israel=-
Monday, Oct 29, code 210630781
Dial-in information:
US/Canada: +1.866.432.9903
India: +91.80.4103.3979
Israel: +972.9.892.7026
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 12:13 +0200, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Done.
Was this fixed in the ibutils git repo too ?
-- Hal
-- Yevgeny
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 13:08 -0700, Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
I ran into this compile error in today's daily build,
not sure who
Hello,
There is a new branch ofed_kernel_2_6_24_rc1 under
git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_3/linux-2.6.git
All patches from kernel_patches/fixes that were applied in 2.6.24-rc1 were
removed from kernel_patches/fixes directory.
The problematic patches from kernel_patches/fixes were moved to the
Someone proposed a fourth option worth considering which is staying
later on Friday. Here are the alternatives we are looking for
feedback on:
(1) Are you willing and able to attend if we start at
11:00am on Thursday rather than at 1:00pm?
(2) If we are able to, would you prefer to see
The iw_cxgb3 module depends on the linux kernel genalloc service. This
service gets compiled into the kernel _only_ if another subsystem has a
config dependency on the genalloc module (CONFIG_GENERIC_ALLOCATOR). In
addtion, there are only two users of this service: iw_cxgb3 and some
IA64
This is the agenda for the OFED meeting about beta readiness:
1. Review beta tasks status:
1. Fix compilation problems on PPC with 32 bits - Vlad Oren
(Mellanox) - on work
2. Rebase kernel code on 2.6.24 rc1 (depending it's
availability) - on work (please read mail from Vlad
Hal Rosenstock wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 12:13 +0200, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Done.
Was this fixed in the ibutils git repo too ?
Yes, but the current ibutils maintainer is Oren Kladnitsky,
so you need to pull ibutils from here:
1) the long time and endless threads related to the SA caching thing
need to be there. Sean - I saw that you prepare a session, correct? will
you presenting few possible designs?
I was asked to prepare a session and will mention some of the general
scalability issues that we've seen with
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello,
There is a new branch ofed_kernel_2_6_24_rc1 under
git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_3/linux-2.6.git
All patches from kernel_patches/fixes that were applied in 2.6.24-rc1
were removed from kernel_patches/fixes directory.
The problematic patches from
Steve Wise wrote:
Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello,
There is a new branch ofed_kernel_2_6_24_rc1 under
git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_3/linux-2.6.git
All patches from kernel_patches/fixes that were applied in 2.6.24-rc1
were removed from kernel_patches/fixes directory.
The problematic
7) the inform info code. Sean - you have implemented and attempted to
push it through the sa caching push, but since the cache was rejected so
did the inform info code. So the questions here - how do we make this
push happen? are there any open issues, etc
There either needs to be an in
On 10/29/07, Or Gerlitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Assuming that the allocation of slots within the schedule to have
enough time for Linux IB developers to discuss what ever they decide
they need to would be taken care of) I'd like to check with people what
we want to be on the agenda of these
On 10/29/07, Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) the long time and endless threads related to the SA caching thing
need to be there. Sean - I saw that you prepare a session, correct? will
you presenting few possible designs?
I was asked to prepare a session and will mention some of the
I've pushed out a release 1.0.4 of librdmacm that addresses some of the feedback
from Doug. Patches were posted previously to the list, with a small update
based on that feedback.
Please pull this release into OFED 1.3.
Changes from 1.0.3:
librdmacm/cma: provide wrapper functions to extract
18 matches
Mail list logo
