[ewg] [PATCH] IB/ehca: Return correct #SGEs for SRQ

2007-12-10 Thread Joachim Fenkes
Firmware would round up the number of SGEs to four, because the WQE structure holds four SGEs. For SRQ, only three are supported, so return a fixed value instead. Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The patch will apply cleanly on top of Roland's git. Please review and apply for

[ewg] Why do we need RHAS4 up2 up3 on kernel_addons?

2007-12-10 Thread Erez Zilber
Vlad, I saw that you removed RHAS4 up2 up3 from kernel backports. I think that you can also delete them from kernel addons. Erez ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg

[ewg] [PATCH] IB/iser: renamed backport patches deleted unnecessary patches

2007-12-10 Thread Erez Zilber
Vlad, I renamed some of the iSCSI/iSER backport patches and deleted some unnecessary patches. Please pull from git://git.openfabrics.org/~erezz/linux-2.6.git ofed_kernel Thanks, Erez ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org

Re: [ewg] Why do we need RHAS4 up2 up3 on kernel_addons?

2007-12-10 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
Erez Zilber wrote: Vlad, I saw that you removed RHAS4 up2 up3 from kernel backports. I think that you can also delete them from kernel addons. Erez Fixed, Thanks, Vladimir ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org

Re: [ewg] [PATCH] IB/iser: renamed backport patches deleted unnecessary patches

2007-12-10 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
Erez Zilber wrote: Vlad, I renamed some of the iSCSI/iSER backport patches and deleted some unnecessary patches. Please pull from git://git.openfabrics.org/~erezz/linux-2.6.git ofed_kernel Thanks, Erez Done, Regards, Vladimir ___ ewg mailing list

[ewg] openmpi-1.2.4 compilation error in orte_abort.c on Fedora 8 and patch

2007-12-10 Thread Sebastian Schmitzdorff
Hi, on Fedora 8 x86_64 openmpi-1.2.4 doesn't compile. I have tested beginning with OFED 1.3beta2 until current. In function 'open', inlined from 'orte_abort' at runtime/orte_abort.c:91: /usr/include/bits/fcntl2.h:51: error: call to

[ewg] Teleconf today?

2007-12-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
Tziporet is unable to make the teleconference today. Do we still want to have it? If so, I will send out the call-in information. -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org

[ewg] Re: [GIT PULL ofed-1.2.5] - RDMA/cxgb3 - fixes and 5.0 firmware support

2007-12-10 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
Hi Steve, Sorry, I missed your libcxgb3 updates for ofed-1.2.5. It is updated now. There is OFED-1.2.5.4-20071210-0614 build which includes updated libcxgb3 library. In any case we are going to release OFED-1.2.5.5 in a few days. Regards, Vladimir Steve Wise wrote: Vlad, it looks like you

[ewg] Re: [GIT PULL ofed-1.2.5] - RDMA/cxgb3 - fixes and 5.0 firmware support

2007-12-10 Thread Steve Wise
Great, thanks! Steve. Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote: Hi Steve, Sorry, I missed your libcxgb3 updates for ofed-1.2.5. It is updated now. There is OFED-1.2.5.4-20071210-0614 build which includes updated libcxgb3 library. In any case we are going to release OFED-1.2.5.5 in a few days. Regards

[ewg] No teleconf today

2007-12-10 Thread Jeff Squyres
We're at T-45 minutes before the teleconference and no one has said that they want the call today (and Tziporet cannot attend), so I'm going to cancel it. I'll send an Outlook cancelation momentarily. -- Jeff Squyres Cisco Systems ___ ewg mailing

[ewg] Please pull latest libehca

2007-12-10 Thread Stefan Roscher
He Vladimir, Please pull for OFED 1.3 the following branch for libehca. git://git.openfabrics.org/~/scm/libehca.git branch: ofed_1_3 Thanks Stefan, ___ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org

[ewg] RE: sean_cm_limit_mra_timeout.patch

2007-12-10 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 10:24 -0800, Sean Hefty wrote: I have some questions about sean_cm_limit_mra_timeout.patch which appears to be in both OFED 1.2.5 and OFED 1.3. The description references a really long timeout issue with Engenio SRP targets. Is this patch intended to be pushed upstream

[ewg] RE: sean_cm_limit_mra_timeout.patch

2007-12-10 Thread Sean Hefty
but it's currently solidly part of both OFED 1.3 and 1.2.5. Should it then be ? IMO - any patch which has been rejected for upstream submission or is considered experimental should be yanked from OFED. Is there some other approach to the specific problem this patch was attempting to fix ? A

[ewg] RE: sean_cm_limit_mra_timeout.patch

2007-12-10 Thread Sean Hefty
The patch has: + if (cm_id_priv-timeout_ms cm_convert_to_ms(max_timeout)) { + printk(KERN_WARNING PFX req timeout_ms %d %d, decreasing\n, + cm_id_priv-timeout_ms, cm_convert_to_ms(max_timeout)); + cm_id_priv-timeout_ms =

[ewg] Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Serialize HCA-related hCalls on POWER5

2007-12-10 Thread Roland Dreier
map_phys_fmr In fact, we do use hCalls there. Our hardware doesn't actually support FMRs, so we translate a map FMR into a reallocate PMR, which doesn't work without hCalls. What's more, the hCalls involved (e.g. H_FREE_RESOURCE) might well return H_LONG_BUSY, so the whole