stgt (SCSI target) is an open-source framework for storage target
drivers. It supports iSCSI over iSER among other storage target drivers.
Voltaire added a git tree for stgt that will be added to OFED 1.4:
http://www2.openfabrics.org/git/?p=~dorons/tgt.git;a=summary
Until OFED 1.4 gets released,
On Feb 5, 2008 3:41 PM, Erez Zilber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stgt (SCSI target) is an open-source framework for storage target
drivers. It supports iSCSI over iSER among other storage target drivers.
Voltaire added a git tree for stgt that will be added to OFED 1.4:
Ignore this patch. Its bad.
Stay tuned for v3...
:(
Steve Wise wrote:
From: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inline max values.
Currently the max inline value is hard-coded and too big for the
chelsio device. This patch allows specifying the max inline as a
command line param.
From: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inline max values.
Currently the max inline value is hard-coded and too big for the
chelsio device. This patch allows specifying the max inline as a
command line param.
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
rdma_lat.c | 13 ++---
1 files
Shirley Ma wrote:
I found one one line was out side for loop when merging this patch
with current git-tree. This caused UD_POST_RCV_COUNT = 16 wrong. I have
fixed it. This is the updated patch.
Thanks
Shirley
Hi Shirley,
Its seems to me that 4K MTU patch is not cooked enough for RC4.
I
rdma_lat: Add option to support devices with different inline max values.
Currently the max inline value is hard-coded and too big for the
chelsio device. This patch allows specifying the max inline as a
command line param.
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
rdma_lat.c | 13
Hello Tziporet,
The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP
performance patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got
less than one day to merge/test the patch with that patch on both intel and
PPC platform. The patch was in good/stable shape before
Hello Tziporet,
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 18:56 +0200, Tziporet Koren wrote:
Shirley Ma wrote:
Hello Tziporet,
The problem was because of the last check in of small UDP performance
patch. It changed the receiving path completely. And I only got less
than one day to merge/test the patch
I've pushed out new releases:
libibcm 1.0.2
librdmacm 1.0.6
to my git tree, and the OFA download pages.
Please pull both packages into OFED 1.3. Major changes from previous release:
libibcm - removes obsolete simple.c test program
librdmacm - updates to build, fix setting QP
Sean Hefty wrote:
I've pushed out new releases:
libibcm 1.0.2
librdmacm 1.0.6
to my git tree, and the OFA download pages.
Please pull both packages into OFED 1.3. Major changes from previous release:
libibcm - removes obsolete simple.c test program
librdmacm - updates to
Can you put a tag with the name ofed_1_3 on these git trees too
I have tags of v1.0.2 and v1.0.6. Can these just be used instead?
___
ewg mailing list
ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
Pradeep,
Can you check if this is resolved?
On 2/4/08, Pradeep Satyanarayana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pulled today's (Feb 4th) OFED build and saw the following Oops while touch
testing
on ehca1 on a 2.6.24 kernel.
Modules linked in: ib_ipoib ib_cm ib_sa ib_uverbs ib_umad ib_ehca ib_mthca
Tziporet Koren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/05/2008 12:07:28
PM:
Please test on RHREL 5 too
What are your stress tests?
Ok. The stress test is similar to netperf/netserver. But it's
bi-directional multiple streams. I have stressed the stream to 150, duplex
running overnight.
Please send
Sean Hefty wrote:
Can you put a tag with the name ofed_1_3 on these git trees too
I have tags of v1.0.2 and v1.0.6. Can these just be used instead?
Its just easier for us when we do diffs to have also the ofed_1_3 as all
other git trees
After some time pass its hard to remember
Its just easier for us when we do diffs to have also the ofed_1_3 as all
other git trees
After some time pass its hard to remember which version was part of
which release :-(
I've added ofed_1_3 tags. Note that if there's a need to update the libraries
again, the tag will need to be deleted and
FWIW, I've updated the packages in my Ubuntu PPA; if you're using it,
you should get the packages automatically with a normal update once
the builds complete. I've also updated the packages I've proposed for
inclusion in Debian.
___
ewg mailing list
Pradeep Satyanarayana wrote:
Eli Cohen wrote:
Pradeep,
Can you check if this is resolved?
On 2/4/08, Pradeep Satyanarayana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pulled today's (Feb 4th) OFED build and saw the following Oops while
touch testing
on ehca1 on a 2.6.24 kernel.
snip
NIP
17 matches
Mail list logo