On 02/01/2011 05:38 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
I know we removed NFSRDMA for being enabled by default, but did someone
intentionally remove it altogether? Or is this a valid bug?
Vlad, do you know?
NFSoRDMA was removed from the list of packages in the install script to prevent
it's installation
This email was generated automatically, please do not reply
git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5
Common build parameters:
Passed:
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.18
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.21.1
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.19
Passed on
This patch was sent to linux-rdma a while ago but had not been accepted yet.
However, no objection was raised so far.
Note: the patch below is not to driver/infiniband/ulp/ipoib but it generates
a patch under kernel_patches/fixes.
--
Index:
This patch helps when SM is busy and so an MC group is left joined
while the host bellies that it is was left.
Note: the patch below is not to driver/infiniband/core but it generates
a patch under kernel_patches/fixes.
Index:
A different patch for the same purpose was already sent tolinux-rdma but had
not been accepted yet. This version of the patch however, was tested heavily
by QA in Voltaire and in the field. When new libibverbs that fixes this issue
comes out we can throw this one away but until then, let's use
Signed-off-by: Aleksey Senin aleks...@voltaire.com
Reviewed-by: Moni Shoua mo...@voltaire.com
--
Index: libibverbs-1.1.3/include/infiniband/verbs.h
===
--- libibverbs-1.1.3.orig/include/infiniband/verbs.h2010-05-27
Add support for RAW_ETH QP. Also, consider the flag IBV_SEND_IP_CSUM in send
operation.
Signed-off-by: Aleksey Senin aleks...@voltaire.com
Reviewed-by: Moni Shoua mo...@voltaire.com
--
diff --git a/src/qp.c b/src/qp.c
index 4322513..d850b1c 100644
--- a/src/qp.c
+++ b/src/qp.c
@@ -229,6
Wouldn't the BUSY patch I proposed last year deal with this situation?
-Original Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Moni Shoua
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Vlad
Cc: n...@voltaire.com; ewg
Subject:
Identify that VLAN is present in a completion and copy it along with the VLAN
ID to the user completion.
Signed-off-by: Aleksey Senin aleks...@voltaire.com
Reviewed-by: Moni Shoua mo...@voltaire.com
--
--- a/src/cq.c 2010-02-08 17:33:45.0 +0200
+++ b/src/cq.c 2010-02-10
Mike Heinz wrote:
Wouldn't the BUSY patch I proposed last year deal with this situation?
Can you please send a link to this patch?
-Original Message-
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
[mailto:ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org] On Behalf Of Moni Shoua
Sent: Wednesday,
It was discussed in the Linux-RDMA list for many months. You can find a list of
the archived messages here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=SA+Busyl=linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
The most recent version of the patch is here:
Add a new flag that can come with a completion to state a presence of a VLAN
Signed-off-by: Aleksey Senin aleks...@voltaire.com
Reviewed-by: Moni Shoua mo...@voltaire.com
--
--- a/include/infiniband/verbs.h2010-01-19 16:12:06.0 +0200
+++ b/include/infiniband/verbs.h
Mike Heinz wrote:
It was discussed in the Linux-RDMA list for many months. You can find a list
of the archived messages here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?q=SA+Busyl=linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
The most recent version of the patch is here:
On 02/02/2011 02:47 AM, Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
On 02/01/2011 05:38 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
I know we removed NFSRDMA for being enabled by default, but did someone
intentionally remove it altogether? Or is this a valid bug?
Vlad, do you know?
NFSoRDMA was removed from the list of
On 02/02/2011 06:21 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
On 02/02/2011 02:47 AM, Vladimir Sokolovsky wrote:
On 02/01/2011 05:38 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
I know we removed NFSRDMA for being enabled by default, but did someone
intentionally remove it altogether? Or is this a valid bug?
Vlad, do you know?
The worst thing is that there is no indication to the user about this state
There can be multiple users of the same group. Only the last one leaving
causes the leave request to be sent. Notifying that one user of the group
doesn't help. All they can do is ask for the leave request to be
Hey Guys,
I am trying to enable GPUDirect support in our environment and I have built
OFED release 1.5.2. I was expecting the following directory to be created
but don't see this directory and the files within that would help me enable
gpudirect:
/sys/module/ib_core/parameters
The parameter
It is not yet in the distro. If you need the code, please send me an email.
Gilad
From: ewg-boun...@lists.openfabrics.org
To: ewg@lists.openfabrics.org
Sent: Wed Feb 02 13:03:24 2011
Subject: [ewg] GPUDirect Support
Hey Guys,
I am trying to enable
Hey Gilad,
Yes, I would definitely need this. Can you please share the code and how to
enable this functionality.
Thanks,
J
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gilad Shainer shai...@mellanox.com wrote:
It is not yet in the distro. If you need the code, please send me an email.
Gilad
Vlad,
Please pull from:
ssh://v...@www.openfabrics.org/~swise/scm/ofed_kernel.git ofed_1_5
Thanks,
Steve.
commit b56ea1597bcc9baf0f538a974aa6c50ca72e83a4
Author: Steve Wise sw...@opengridcomputing.com
Date: Wed Feb 2 16:01:55 2011 -0600
cxgb3: 2.6.35 backports.
Hi Gilad,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:55:46 -0800
Jagga Soorma jagg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Gilad,
Yes, I would definitely need this. Can you please share the code and how to
enable this functionality.
I second this. as we're running our own kernel we've been unable so far to
use GPUDirect
21 matches
Mail list logo
