Jim,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:14 -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:13 -0600, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Steve,
One more thought below...
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:49 -0700, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Steve,
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:19 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
Hello
Hi Jim,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:59 -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi Hal,
I've just discovered that what I thought was ofed-1.2 opensm
is really ofed-1.2-rc2, if it matters.
I don't recall what the differences were but let's assume it's not
significant for now.
Anyway:
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at
Hi again Jim,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:40 -0700, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:59 -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi Hal,
I've just discovered that what I thought was ofed-1.2 opensm
is really ofed-1.2-rc2, if it matters.
I don't recall what the differences were
Hi Jim,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 15:49 -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi Hal,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 14:40 -0600, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:59 -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi Hal,
I've just discovered that what I thought was ofed-1.2 opensm
is really
Hello opensm gurus:
Sandia is seeing problems after migrating up to ofed-1.3. They are
still using an ofed-1.2 opensm but with ofed-1.3 clients, updated from
ofed-1.2.5.
They are getting the errors below.
Q: should this work? Or are the backwards compat issues?
Thanks,
Steve.
Steve,
One more thought below...
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:49 -0700, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Steve,
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:19 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
Hello opensm gurus:
Sandia is seeing problems after migrating up to ofed-1.3. They are
still using an ofed-1.2 opensm but with
Steve,
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 11:19 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
Hello opensm gurus:
Sandia is seeing problems after migrating up to ofed-1.3. They are
still using an ofed-1.2 opensm but with ofed-1.3 clients, updated from
ofed-1.2.5.
Was the OpenSM node changed in some way or only the end