If what works Does it?
-Original Message-
From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test
This is a test to see if this works.
_
List
It works. You've fallen into his clever trap.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
If what works Does it?
-Original Message-
May I please ask What the H$$$ are you doing working?
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
It works. You've fallen into his clever trap.
(:=
-Original
I'm Great Cthulhu. I do all kinds of stuff when the stars are right.
Duh.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
May I please ask What
Is cloudy over here... I can't see any stars
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
I'm Great Cthulhu. I do all kinds of stuff when the stars are right.
Duh.
(:=
Open a window. Really. Do it.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leo Ballester
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Is cloudy over here... I can't see any stars
-Original
No windows... (Basement)
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Open a window. Really. Do it.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks for the answer.
But, if I change my name in the mailbox, How other people will send
messages to me?
Is possible to disable this feature?
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Ed Crowley
Enviado el: domingo, 08 de septiembre de 2002 7:46
There is no Cabal.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 03:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
I'm Great Cthulhu. I do all kinds of stuff when the stars are right.
Duh.
(:=
I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000
install if you didn't have AD. Am I wrong?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William
Lefkovics
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 17:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Work is just a figment of you imanagation
-Original Message-
From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 2:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
May I please ask What the H$$$ are you doing working?
-Original Message-
Not for me, on this list. 1-2 minutes for each post
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dale Geoffrey
Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 15:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Account suspended, again
And the fact that it can
Did you contact the list admin at the bottom of the email?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Account suspended, again
Anyone know if we are
Any of your machines ? How often do you update them?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aguet, Pierre
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 04:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch
What about reinstalled the admin AFTER SRPing the box?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Hall
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 03:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K patch
Hi
Just as well. If there was, your sorry little ass would be at the top of
any do not employ, do not assist and do not associate with lists that
might not allegedly exist.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 15:18
To:
Search the archives
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mitchell Mike
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 11:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: confidentiality disclaimers
Good morning,
Outlook 98 exchange 5.5 sp4
My management
Got money ? Get MS to consult for u.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes
(IT)
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 12:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: custom NDR?
OK I'm looking for info, but in the meantime, in both/either 5.5
What version of Exchange?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Dead Directory Service
We have an exchange server in another site in our org (only server in
Got education? Learn the difference between u and you.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Got money ? Get MS to consult for u.
-Original Message-
From:
I have no idea what you heard.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/8/2002 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Must Decide; EX5.5 or EX2K
I thought I heard there was a really limited featured Exchange 2000
install if you didn't have AD. Am I wrong?
Skipping the fact this question has already long since been resolved; that
it isn't E2K is obvious from the post and for any version of Exchange prior
to that the answer is the same.
Don't worry David, I blame the American public school system for failing to
teach you to read critically.
I think that an answer of You know, I have no clue. would have been better
:)
The purpose of asking was to see if anyone knew. I know I could do some
testing but I that would not show me everything. Testing will only give me a
partial answer and I am looking for a complete one.
Thanks for the
Why would testing only give you a partial answer?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Rojas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
I think that an answer of You know, I have no clue. would have
I suspect you'll find that (a) Ed knows more than your tiny little mind can
comprehend, and (b) had you tested and then posted the results of those
tests, you'd get far more responsive answers, instead of which you sit back
and expect others to do your work for them, and then attempt to
So make two mailboxes, one for each purpose.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cabezas, Manuel
Sent: Sunday, September
Thanks for your contribution. It was right on the mark, but five days
after three other posts suggesting pretty much the same thing. You
really ought to sort your messages in this forum by conversation subject
so you don't duplicate the responses of others.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Your proposed answer would have been technically and factually inaccurate.
I'm curious as to why anyone would need such a list (since I've worked with
thousands of Exchange organizations without a sheet detailing this
information). Perhaps if you had a goal you were trying to achieve with
Not that they don't exist, at least in rough form. I've reviewed a few
preliminary drafts of such lists in the past few weeks. Don't want to
surprise anyone about their next performance review or interview right now,
but I will say there was some entertaining stuff on those lists. Some of the
If, by really limited featured, you mean, absolutely no, then, yes,
you're still wrong in general terms, albeit not on this precise question.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:19 AM
He knows, but is sworn to secrecy on the subject. About all he'll ever offer
is the cryptic riddle, Try them and see. If you spent more than a
millisecond deciphering that irony-laden statement, you would realize a dawn
of knowledge you never before imagined possible, which is probably why you
You cannot disable the feature that allows you to change names on mailboxes.
Such a feature is integral to the workings of the management console.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cabezas, Manuel
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 7:40
Not as classically ascerbic as a Gary Slinger answer, but still sufficiently
tart for a jolly good rejoinder. I give it 4 pink sundresses out of 5
possible.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Sunday, September 08,
Brilliant. Verbally succinct, dead on target. Rapier wit.
I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your
plans for following up on this critical success?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent:
And who the hell is Cartman and why should he throw exceptions,
anyway?!?
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Logging Levels? (take 2)
He knows, but is sworn to
Starts off mellow, but builds to a crescendo of backhandedness worthy of a
true master. Yet, the final ending is a bit disappointing after such a
promising midsection, much like the ending for What's Opera, Doc?
Nevertheless a fine performance, worthy of repeat viewing. 4 pink sundresses
and a
Oooh Ed is gonna look good at MEC with that wardrobe!
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: confidentiality disclaimers
Starts off mellow, but builds to a crescendo of
Hopefully more frequently than you check your email.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5 after W2K
Indeed.
You have to ask yourself, who had the motive to crash the server, who had
the ability to crash it, and who had the opportunity?
(We're talking about something completely different here. This is
priviledged communication, so everyone else disregard this thread. To help
some of you
You mean 5 days + 1-2 minutes for each post.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Account suspended, again
Not for me, on this list. 1-2
17 days to think about this one and that's ALL you can come up with?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to
Like you could enlighten him anyway. Go on. Try. I dare you.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch 5.5
Please do us all a favor and don't respond to any more posts from before
today. You really don't have to catch up on last week. If I miss a week, I
just delete everything in my inbox and let the new messages trickle on in
and respond to those, if I feel like it. If not, I'll delete them, as well.
No. The list admin contacted HIM. If you read the thread, you'd--
Oh, never mind. You won't learn, not today, not now.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Indeed. Heck, I'll wear one, should I ever get to MEC.
Any artists on the list may feel free to contribute their renditions of what
Great Cthulhu in a pink sundress (and matching hat) would look like at an
MEC. The winning submission will be made into an overpriced, yet fun,
t-shirt.
(:=
It's got a good beat and it's easy to dance to. I give it an 85.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu
Jones
I have never been anal probed.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harmon,
Michelle M.
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002
Ed always looks good at MEC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 5:04 PM
Thank you, thank you, I believe I'll be modelling said pink sundresses in a
hotel bar at MEC...
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 00:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Brilliant. Verbally
49 matches
Mail list logo
