Looking over some documentation, it appears I need to install Exchange 2000
on the server currently providing OWA 5.5 and configure it to run as a
Front-End server.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
(602) 631-7486
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
Yes, you can run 5.5 OWA against an E2K server. You can't however install
only the OWA component for E2K, there is no 'only OWA component' for E2K.
You need to install and configure an E2K FE server.. Which means it needs to
be E2K enterprise and communicates on a variety of ports different than
I have a user who claims that he sent a newsletter via email using a
different mailbox as the FROM address (to which he had Send As
permissions), he used the BCC field to send his email to approximately 300
receipients that included 2 internal distribution lists.
I have 2 problems:
A) The email
have you checked the white space?
Dave Stevens
-IT Network Support-
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Moving from 1 server to another
I have moved
Enterprise was the plan all along so that isn't a big deal.
Question on the ports: Looking at Q280132, communication between a remote
user and the FE Server is all on common http ports correct? The additional
ports would be between the FE Server and the BE Server.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN
Forgot to include the following information:
OUTLOOK 2000
EXCHANGE 5.5. SP4
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question about BCC
I have a user who claims that he sent a newsletter
Log in as the user and check the message.
On 1/17/03 14:45, RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a user who claims that he sent a newsletter via email using a
different mailbox as the FROM address (to which he had Send As
permissions), he used the BCC field to send his email to
And between the FE server and a GC. I think the E2K FAQ lists some of those
ports.
On 1/17/03 15:06, Bailey, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enterprise was the plan all along so that isn't a big deal.
Question on the ports: Looking at Q280132, communication between a remote
user and the FE
Do you mean the user who sent the message or the user on whose behalf the
message was sent ? I have logged in as the user who sent the message and
checked - same problem.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:27 PM
To: Exchange
Try the other? Was it a send as, or on behalf of?
On 1/17/03 15:24, RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean the user who sent the message or the user on whose behalf the
message was sent ? I have logged in as the user who sent the message and
checked - same problem.
-Original
I found the Q article after I sent this.
The FE Server looks fairly straight forward to setup. If anybody has any
tips/pitfalls to share, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks for you help.
- Matt
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto, Inc.
(602) 631-7486
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Trend tech support thought it had to do with Exchange 2000 default of
Limit number of messages per connection to 20 (Default SMTP
propertiesMessages). I'm not really buying that, but after enough time
spent, I took Trend out of the loop for Outgoing mail. It's just
scanning Incoming mail and the
Does anyone have any experience with any of the 3rd party Exchange 2000
POP3 connectors? Or better yet, is there a way to install the SBS POP3
Connector on a non-SBS box?
J a s o n C l i s h e
Senior Network Engineer
Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only experience I have with them is telling people they suck after they
complain about odd behavior which can only be attributed to the use of such
things. Happens with the BB Server version as much as with any other.
On 1/17/03 16:20, Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone
Recommendation: None.
List of available options:
http://www.slipstick.com/exs/popconnect.htm
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Does anyone have
Something must be wrong with either the tape HW or the driver you are
using.
This was the problem. The Hpdat driver did not load properly, and the
system was using a generic 4mm dat driver.
Many thanks!
Jim Helfer
WTW Architects
Pittsburgh PA
I've deployed Linux desktop solutions with no more training than Windows
requires. Indeed, most of the users did not even know it wasn't
Windows.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:09 AM
How about 5000+ WindowsCE clients accessing terminal services:
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/story/0,10801,77383,00.ht
ml
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:21 PM
ICA?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me.
I've deployed Linux desktop solutions with no more training than Windows
requires. Indeed, most of the users
I am re-engineering my campus network and need user opinions on
networking gear. Does anyone know of a good list like this one that
deals with routers switches, etc?
Jeff Hague
_
List posting FAQ:
Howdy - been away from the Exchange world for a little while, now thrown
back into it.
Just looked at the email/file server for a small firm for the first
time. No Internet email is going in or out. Mail to others within the
office appears to be fine. But the Internet Mail Connector seems to be
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
