That doesn't read well at all ;-)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 05:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MS Purchase
I'm recycling Scharffisms in celebration of his MVPness.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Okay, weve got more than one local domain on the exchange server, only
one domain is actually used for the servers, i.e. the active directory,
the other domains are just legacy internet domains with the MX record
set as our exchange server.
To allow delivery of emails to people in the exchange
How about using the Black Hole DL trick instead?
Create a Distribution Group with no members, add the no longer valid SMTP
addresses to this group, then hide the group from the Exchange address
lists.
The emails will come in and disappear w/o generating a NDR.
- Original Message -
From:
We have a winner. Yes, I have installed (and removed) the Business
Contact Manager.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Jason, I'm going to bet that you installed the Business
Sorry if this is been ans..before...havent found it on technet yet.
a Calendar put in the PUBLIC FOLDERS ALL PUBLC FOLDERS
I'd like to assign permissions based on groups to this cal...
I even tried it NG..if I assign each user OK...
Ex.
But say I have 10 users in a group: GROUP1
and I assing
Has any admins here worked with having Sharepoint 2001 crawl their public
folders?
I am trying to set this up and have all the Exchange Server info set but
cannot find where to add the content source.
Is there anyone that can help?
Chris
Of course, five minutes after sending this I figured it out. Thanks to
anyone who replied.
Chris!
This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com
- Original Message -
From:
Maybe its still too early in the morning, but they all count 5-7-5 to me
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:05 PM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Friday Haiku
Subject: RE: Friday Haiku
Not one of those is haiku.
Count
7-11!
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Friday Haiku
Maybe its still too early in the morning, but they all count 5-7-5 to me
-Original Message-
From: Ed
Yes, the duplicate contacts have fax entries. that's by design? Please
explain? Thank you..
Do they have Fax entries for those duplicate contacts?=20
If so, that's by design.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A fax address is a valid electronic address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:50 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Duplicate Entries listed in Address Book...
Subject: RE: Duplicate Entries listed in Address Book...
The recipient policy doesn't have to apply to anybody (much less everybody) - they
just need to BE there. Make a recipient policy that applies to nobody that has all
those domains. Get rid of the connector. Problem solved. They'll bounce properly at
that point.
-Original Message-
And your only alternative Martin, other than removing the fax entries, is to
use an alternative field.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: Duplicate Entries listed in
Do I have to manually delete all of the duplicate contacts (fax entries)
or is there a way to automatically delete all of them?
A fax address is a valid electronic address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:50 AM
I never thought that adding the domain names to Address Space and checking
allow relaying to these domains would make Exchange think that these are
local domains. I only use recipient policies to anchor domains as local.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I think that technically it doesn't make the server think the domain as
local it just allows relaying to that domain, so when an email is sent
in the server allows for its transport, then it finds itself as the the
destination and attempts delivery to itself.
Or something like that.
Ill try the
Please point me in the right direction if you could, after I have made
the Policy, what says who it applies to?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
The recipient policy doesn't
leave it blank. Or create a query that won't find anyone.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Please point me in the right direction if you could, after I have made
the
Im at a loss again here.
I create the new recipient Policy, I call it something. I then proceed
to enter the address space, which is @kwikform.co.uk in the Email
Addresses tab.
That tells exchange to accept @kwikform.co.uk emails. I don't see any
other tab apart from filter users, is that what
They're not duplicate entries.. One entry is for the e-mail address, the
other is for the fax address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 10:04 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Duplicate Entries listed in Address
on the General page, there is a button called [Filter rules]
you could just ignore that button.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Im at a loss again here.
I create
Hi all
MSX55+SP4
1org,1site
users report that they get owa was unable to get to your inbox when they
try to access their mail via OWA.
Curious thing is that same OWA worked before and without any intervention
that same owa works afterand then someother day stop to work..and so on.
It Is
Hi,
Is there a tool for determining attachments and their size in either the
public or private store?
Thanks,
Erik L. Vesneski
Sr. Systems Specialist
ISO - Intel Systems
Ph#: 925-685-6161
www.pmigroup.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So if it suddenly stops working and then just as suddenly starts working
again then that's not what Q248081 describes. 248081 says the
problem is permanent.
How many servers in the site? How many host mailboxes?
Any problems i.e. pinging the server from the desktop?
Is it specific to some
What error do they get?
Is it a top level folder, or buried under others?
Does the group receive permissions correctly on any other public folder?
etc
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:27 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange
Unable Disp folderdo not have suff permissions on object..
What I dont know is if it should or shouldnt read into a GROUP to find the
user object to then allow permission
User object - OK
GROUP - NG
thanks
bill
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL
Several 3rd party vendors have such tools.
-Original Message-
From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 12:41 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Tool For Attachments in Either Pub or Priv Store
Subject: Tool For Attachments in Either Pub or Priv
Is not talking to AOL a bad thing?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How do I make sure my exchange server is not acting as an
Open Relay?
I checked, and didn't see that you are running
Is there a way of configuring it so that your bounces do not come from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of postmaster@(default recipient
policy)?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
The recipient policy
We have a requirement to create an anonomous e-mail box that will:
1) Use Microsoft exchange 5.5
2) Allow any user to use the mailbox so that the e-mail remains anonomous.
3) Restrict delivery to a specific mailbox or distribution group only so
that the mailbox is not used to spam others.
4)
www.cdolive.com has script samples for an anonymous PF. Seems to meet
the overall requirements, if not specific ones
-Original Message-
From: Reyes Balderas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:32 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Creating a restricted e-mail
http://victori.hypermart.net/rpm.html
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:31 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Multiple domains.
Subject: RE: Multiple domains.
Is there a way of configuring it so that your bounces do not
Have w2k sp3 root domain, w2k3 child domain.
Exchange 2000 sp3 installed on a member server in the
child domain. When I mailbox enable a user in the root
domain, it is not available in the GAL nor can I
connect to mailbox from an Outlook client. A RUS entry
is created for both domains. No apparent
Was domainprep run in the parent domain? Does the user's mailbox get
stamped with the appropriate attributes by the RUS?
-Original Message-
From: chuck robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:46 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Mailbox enabled users in
I can't count to five.
I cannot count to seven.
Guess I'll go to bed.
Wait a sec! Check that!
I'll count syllables again
First one's five-six-five.
That nonwithstanding,
My post was all screwed up. Oops!
Seven-five-seven.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
One man's Spam is another man's UCE.
35 matches
Mail list logo
