and if there are only 250 users/350 mailboxes then I doubt you are
talking about multiple staff members or sites who are effected. This is
just:
1 staff member
1 site
1 server
Correct?
The selling point on your side at that point will be the great deviation
in IBM price that will occur if your
Performance - you'd be surprised how quickly Outlook can run over the
Internet nowadays. But it can go either way, depending on the provider.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL
I was wondering if anyone has experienced this before, or has an idea of
what to look at. I am running Exchange 5.5 SP4, and most clients are
running Outlook 97 or 98. I have recently noticed that on the client end,
when sending an attachment (even 300KB), Outlook appears to hang for 1-2
minutes.
Is there a way that I can NOT allow HTML emails without affecting web outlook?
I am sick of those friggin smilies!
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Alpha Display Systems.
Alpha Video
_
List posting FAQ:
Anyone have an Exchange 2003 server running on Windows 2003 in a Windows
2000 domain? Here's what's going (well planning) to happen at my org. I
have 4 Exchange 5.5sp4 boxes w/NT4sp6 in a Win2000 domain w/AD. Want to
install a normal server with W2k3 and put E2k3 on it. Here's my plan
(joining
Is their a good NT admin/2000/AD list??
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe:
This is a great list:
The WINNT-L list is hosted on a Windows NT(TM) machine running L-Soft
international's LISTSERV(R) software. For subscription/signoff info and
archives, see http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html .
COPYRIGHT INFO:
Any issues? There are always some issues. But there's nothing wrong with
your idea.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fred
Hi,
I need to move everything arriving in the Sent Items of a particular
mailbox to a public folder (EX5.5).
A outlook rules wizard rule would be client side only (move to PF), but
there could be no client open (those mails actually are sent by cdo agent
running in another PF with the priviledge
I seem to be failing relay testing on 5,7, and 9. Is there a way NOT to
fail these tests in an exch 5.5 environment? My ques are seeing a lot of
garbage that I don't think is getting out, I'm all over google trying to get
a better idea of what these tests mean.
e-
Martin,
This first link may be the answer to your problem...it's what I plan on
going to in the near future. The second link is an option, if you choose to
wait as long as six months.
Call Forward Service Has Many Advantages - Cingular:
There is a folder on my exchangen 2000 server called BadMail. It has about
150 Mb of data in. Can anyone tell me what type of email goes in this
folder and why its still there. It appears that there are messages dating
all they way back to day 1. Can I just kill it?
Thanks
Jim
But you still have to use landline service to have this.
I interpret this as simple call forwarding made simpler.
Maybe I am missing something.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
You can read .BAD files with Notepad and if they are of no value -
delete them and the corresponding two other files (each .BAD file has
.BDP and .BDR files with the same name)
Files that go into the Bad folder are the NDRs that could not be sent
out because the messages that caused NDRs came
Sorry...guess you're right on that point...
Guess I was thinking more along the lines of the having multiple cell
phones with the same number bit. If you had 3 Cingular phones with
different numbers and a cradle for each, then at least when they ring,
they'd all ring on one number...would save
I'd like to know what you (Jon) aren't being told (so would you I bet).
No one calls IBM in for less than half a server's worth of mail
outsourcing. What else have you got knocking about? Any heavyweight
OS/390 apps around?
You might want to be looking for invisible ink on that meeting agenda.
In my house I have 3 phones. One in the kitchen, one in my office, and one
in my bedroom. All the same number.
I want to have that still. So in my case, going to a single cell really
makes no sense unless I want to carry my phone all over the house. Then when
a call comes in for my wife, having
Guys,
good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now have
regained my space back.
thanks for the help
Pat
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
Does anyone have a template for best practices when MS Exchange is being
used by an org?
I keep having to explain to users that it is industry standand or it's
org. procedure that we do things a certain way but I don't have anything
in writing that dictates those explanations. I would be very
no prob
--
From: pat karr
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange 5.5 private stores and purging
Guys,
good news, I did the eseutil /d /priv on my exchange box and now
Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4
So to my surprise I get a email notifying me that my domain is on a
blacklist, what a great way to start a Monday. So I relay test my email
server via abuse.net and I fail all the tests! Then I reboot the server and
once again all is well. I test it again and now my
Definitely, Mr. Crowley. But that won't happen here for about three months,
and I bought the new Mac on Friday. She'll need better connectivity than
5.5's OWA 'til then. Even then, however, won't Entourage hook up to 2003
more easily?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP]
IIRC, Entourage needs an update pack for Exchange connectivity. The
originally released Entourage only did POP3 and IMAP. Native Exchange
features required remaining at Outlook 2001 (on OS9).
http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/entouragex/entouragex.aspx?pid=entourag
ex
There's a
You'll likely need something third-party to eliminate these.
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 8:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: HTML EMails
Is there a way that I can NOT allow HTML emails without affecting web
Depends on what 5, 7 and 9 are. Some failures are baloney. That is, just
because a message is accepted doesn't mean it's relayed. If it's
black-holed, that's good enough. However, that's harder to test, so the
test providers simply fail you.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
Hell, I have two in my bathrooms alone!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:29
Why not share your controversial procedures and let us commend you or shoot
them down?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pat karr
How much space? If it wasn't a lot, then keep an eye on it because it just
might bounce back up.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Entourage is nice but it is does not have full Outlook function.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Holstrom, Don J.
Sent:
29 matches
Mail list logo
