RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread John Matteson
They aren't a valid survey of broadcasters from around the country. There only appeal is to middle aged MTV burn-outs. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22,

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread Jason Clayton
Greg-- SHUT UP! Why are you making this your personal agenda. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Um, yes it DOES make it

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread Black, Nathan
I believe that the answer to the question about a shop's behaviour is that it depends. Perhaps, there could exist an assumption that there are two types of shops. It consultant shops, and product specialist shops. The shop that only considers one solution is a product specialist. An

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread Jason Clayton
If you were truly sorry you would stop!! -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Too easy: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:52:58 -0800 For those of you

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread Jason Clayton
Can I get a jacket? XXL preferably -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Apples and oranges. Ed is not the IT director of Ohio (nor does he

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread Ben Winzenz
Good grief! Talk about LAG! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Jason Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:31 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on

Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ?

2003-12-24 Thread Walden H. Leverich III
All, I've asked a similar question before, but that was 5.5 - 2000 and we didn't end up moving. So: I'm looking to move from 5.5 - 2003. At the end of the process I'll be running 2003 on the same physical box I'm now running 5.5 on. However, I don't want to do an in place upgrade so I'll be

RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ?

2003-12-24 Thread Tony Hlabse
I would search the MS Exchange site for deployment scenario's and what is allowed and not allowed as far as in-place verses move method. There are probably more steps you haven't considered. From: Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ?

2003-12-24 Thread Walden H. Leverich III
I have (but I'll look again.) There are a number of sub-steps involved that I left out, the root of my question though is Does it matter which box is the upgrade. However, I'll double check the docs and see if that's addressed. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software

Starting to wind down here... Seasons Greetings!

2003-12-24 Thread Sirius F. Crackhoe
Well, things are starting to wind down here for the long Christmas Break (5 days is a long time for me!!). I am hoping and praying that none of the servers start singing, RAID arrays roasting on an open fire and that we all get some much needed time with our friends and families. To everyone on

Upgrading to Exchange 2000

2003-12-24 Thread Dolphin, Jeff
Finally got the budget for an upgrade of Exchange 5.5! I just started to research the upgrade process and I have a couple real quick questions...If I am missing a Service Account Admin ONLY on the recipients container (I have SAA rights for site and server and admin rights for recipients) will

RE: exch sa won't start

2003-12-24 Thread Craig A. Mills
I'm getting event errors 1005 and 2059 which state dsproxy.dll won't initialize. This is a brand new install into a exch 5.5 site. I'm in process of migrating from 5.5/nt40 to exch2k3/win2k3. Copied new dsproxy.dll did not help. Q821907 list several dlls required including seckm.dll. I can't

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

2003-12-24 Thread Ely, Don
I already asked for that!! He chose NOT to respond... ;o) -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics OK, I can be childish as well. You PROVE

RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ?

2003-12-24 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Install Exchange 2003 on the new box and then move mailboxes to it. The other way is more work and you don't get any benefit. Don't forget all the preparatory steps like the ADC, ForestPrep, and DomainPrep. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs

RE: Upgrading to Exchange 2000

2003-12-24 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Upgrade to Exchange 2003 using the swing server method. Skip Exchange 2000 entirely. Exchange 2003 is superior in just about every way and why do the upgrade twice? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original