OALGen

Anyone ever get an event id 9127 when attempting to rebuild the OAL in Exchange 2000 system manager. I've looked at kb Q312250 and 318237. I'm running in a mixed mode with an E2k Server joined to a 5.5 organization. Any thoughts? Jason Cook Network Administrator J.H. Ellwood Associates [EMAIL

RE: No Public Folders in Systems Manager

When I expand the public folders tree in Exchange 2000 systems manager, I see no folders. Any reason? Jason Cook Network Administrator J.H. Ellwood Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] 312 782-7493 x. 152 DISCLAIMER! The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is intended

RE: Somewhere a box needs kicking...

What's the deal? -Original Message- From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 11:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Somewhere a box needs kicking... Anyone else having trouble with this list? Over the last 24 hours, I'm seeing sporadic message

Test

This is a test to see if this works. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange

MTA Problem?

After a recent introduction of an E2k server into a 5.5 org, there has = been a small problem with a particular recipient.=A0 The recipient is = internal and it seems the problem only occurs from accounts located on the e2k = server.=A0 Every time an E2k user send mail to this recipient they get

RE: Exchange.NET anyone ?

I heard from an MS Exchange Tech that the next rev will include things like mobile user management. I think their idea is to get rid of Mobile Information Server and integrate that into the next Exchange rev. Other than that I don't know, hopefully there's some more OWA tweaks. Jason Cook

RE: emergency help needed

What was the last thing you did to the box before this happened. If not you, perhaps another admin. Jason Cook J.H. Ellwood and Associates Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002

RE: emergency help needed

And after this hotfix, did you restart and get the problem? Perhaps the hotfix, depending on what it patched, could be the problem. Jason Cook J.H. Ellwood and Associates Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bashir Malekzada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: emergency help needed

In that case, find a pc to use as the test. Barring that, not all patches are necessary absolutely. So, if the patch doesn't apply to you don't install it or if there's nothing wrong with the particular area the patch concerns, forget the patch. Jason Cook J.H. Ellwood and Associates

RE: emergency help needed

Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: emergency help needed Except for the PC part I only apply security patches or patches that apply to me -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cook, Jason Sent: Friday

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

understand that's often not feasible for smaller companies. A good security paradigm can take some dough. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

, and in those situations the notion of having internet traffic talking directly to an internal server is about as likely as a CEO forgiving you when 3000 of your users can't work because you thought all that extra work was tiresome. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

responses. That's they way it should play out. Russell C. Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Networking Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp I was referring to DMZ's in general ... -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp What? Can't work...so all people do

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

under you to keep an eye on it all. :) -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp I see. What's your take though? Are we babysitters or what

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

. Internet OWA is production for us. Perhaps it's not really needed in your environment? It depends on your client base. Russell Ragar, MCSE+I, CNE, CCNA Senior Network Engineer PowerTV, Inc. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1

RE: Bad Media

Right. I hate those. Jason Cook J.H. Ellwood and Associates Network Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Bad Media Don't forget those pesky cable

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

Seems a little rash mr. butler, a lot of small companies use the scenario presented by Rob Ellis. A firewall, a good hardware one anyway is great protection if used effectively. OWA with ssl is a good and secure solution, so I'm curious as to why you believe that it's a rule to use a dmz?

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

Seems a little rash mr. butler, a lot of small companies use the scenario presented by Rob Ellis originally. A firewall, a good hardware one anyway is great protection if used effectively. OWA with ssl is a good and secure solution, so I'm curious as to why you believe that it's a rule to use a

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Cook, Jason Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp Seems a little rash mr. butler, a lot of small companies use

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

also understand that's often not feasible for smaller companies. A good security paradigm can take some dough. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

that smtp floods will be avoided with a relay server in place. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp Yes! The voice of reason. Ed, you're the shit

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

be down... -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp Don, what if I sent you 100,000 messages at the same time? What if your clients configured no limit

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp Whoa...Don, take it easy. You asked a question, How can you DoS a mailserver on 25 and I answered. Sure, there's protection against

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

it shouldn't be. Any server in the DMZ should be considered expendable. Mail sitting on an expendable server keeps me up at night. -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils

RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp

you're looking for AND you get some A/V protection. Can't go wrong there -Original Message- From: Cook, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp Don, what do you think