Could use some help, need a refresher!
When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site. Are the connection for
mail delivery automatically setup?
I though they were. Do you have to edit the MTA or IMC connections. IMC is
using DNS for delivery.
There is only one MX record pointing to the 5.5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 5.5/2K co-existance
Could use some help, need a refresher!
When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site
When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot of
prep work that would eliminate most of your questions. You don't even
mention 'Active Directory Connector'. There is a lot more to know before
effectively answering your question as asked.
I recommend starting here:
PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:49:45 -0800
When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot
of
prep work that would eliminate most of your
are
no where to be found.
That is why I think I have a real issue.
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:49:45 -0800
When you install
from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
That is funny you listed that doc, those were the steps I
I do want mail router throgh 5.5 and no changes were made to the STMP
connector
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
Are the servers in the same
Ahh . . . . should have know, DNS!
I had the DC of 2K listed in the DNS of the 5.5 server.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
, February 26, 2003 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
Well now we're getting somewhere. :o)
Start with message tracking. Where is 'never-never land' exactly?
Also, increasing logging might produce some ugly errors in the application
event log (that might make you curse at the ADC
9 matches
Mail list logo
