: You ask a glass of water.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Posted At: Thursday, May 16, 2002 05:02 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: How about this as an option?
Subject: RE: How about this as an option?
=20
=20
Well, whether
, May 16, 2002 05:02 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: How about this as an option?
Subject: RE: How about this as an option?
Well, whether it can or can't is really kind of a moot
point because
it need to pass the message to the specified bridgead(s) in
its site
Thanks Chris, I wont call you Shirley again,
If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down, there are no other
routes for the mailbox server to choose.
So a mailbox server can not see bridgehead servers outside of its routing
group? Correct?
This is a shame especially as
Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so I
have one last question...;¬)
Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using routing group
connectors) and a link to the internet (will use smtp connector).
What we want to be able to do use the internet
Presentation issue handled offline.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How about this as an option?
Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so I
have one last
Thanks Chris, I wont call you Shirley again,
If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down,
there are no
other routes for the mailbox server to choose.
So a mailbox server can not see bridgehead servers outside of its
routing group? Correct?
Well, whether it can
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Presentation issue handled offline.
Thanks Gary.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using
routing group
connectors) and a
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 15:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How about this as an option?
Chris, couldn't find that David Livengood presenattion unfortunately so =
I
have one last question...;=AC)
Each of the 3 hubs has a link to the corporate wan (using
Well, whether it can or can't is really kind of a moot point because it need
to pass the message to the specified bridgead(s) in its site to be passed
on.
That clears that up, thanks.
No, I think[1] that they have knowledge of servers outside of their site,
but they also know what paths
Without additional connectors? No.
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How about this as an option?
If we have three routing groups:
Group A (1 mailbox server, 1 bridgehead server)
Thanks Chris,
Based on what you have said I assume that only bridgehead servers can
choose alternative routes rather than a dedicated mailbox server?
But this would mean that the link state table information is only shared
between connector servers?
Surely the mailbox server would need to
Thanks Chris,
Based on what you have said I assume that only bridgehead
servers can choose alternative routes rather than a dedicated
mailbox server?
If the only bridgehead server in a routing group is down, there are no other
routes for the mailbox server to choose.
But this would
12 matches
Mail list logo
