Ben is correct.one example would be having mail delivered to a PST. The
mail leaves the server inbox without ever being placed in the deleted items
folder. If I'm not mistaken a rule can also be created to delete items,
thus never touching the Deleted items folder. This is why you need the
I think you two are saying the same thing.
Mike Morrison
NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a
My bad. I read the original post as to mean that w/o the hack on the machine
that did the shift-delete those messages couldn't be deleted. Upon
re-reading the post that's not what was said, sorry. I think we can all
agree on the following:
At an end-user machine the hack doesn't need to be
For once! (hehe). But it's only this once
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
It is 100% correct. I do it on a fairly regular basis, in order to keep my
near-diety status with my end users. Or to scare the bejeses out of my
desktop staff, but that's another story.
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
But he also mentioned users and client. There is no way a user could
delete their entire mailbox, right? All the messages in it, yes, but not the
mailbox itself, right? So long as the mail box still exists he should be
able to recover all the messages (assuming he hasn't passed the retention
do a search on Deleted Item Retention Time
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 16 August 2001 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Is their away to recover a users exchange folders after
theydeletethem?
Tried that I dont see
7 matches
Mail list logo
