Actually it comes out to be about twice the size of the mailbox.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have a question about the whole cached mode deal. Does it keep an exact
replica of
Only the initial synchronization would take time. After that, only the
deltas are synched.
And 225MB? How much time would that take to transfer over a typical
corporate network? 100Mb/S?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
initial sync delays each startup.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
Only the initial synchronization would take time. After that, only the
deltas are synched
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rotman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 June 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Well,
I don't have 100Mb/S to my house (assuming you are talking
about MAPI/HTTP, however it is a very cool feature and 225MB
is not a huge mailbox. So,
is that because it accounts for both the .edb and .stm files? :)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
Actually it comes out to be about twice the size
I wasn't thinking of the bandwidth side, that's not a problem. Is the
local copy enabled by default? Don't get me wrong, I think it's a very
good design. I was just thinking about using different profiles on the
same PC. If you can disable it, then no worries.
-Original Message-
I dont believe its enabled by default.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
I wasn't thinking of the bandwidth side, that's not a problem
The local cache file would be associated with the user profile.
Are you concerned that if I log into your PC I can get to your email by
searching under C:\Documents and Settings\Mwoodruff\Juicy_OST_File ?
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
It could be a lot bigger - public folder favorites are also stored locally.
-Original Message-
I have a question about the whole cached mode deal. Does it keep an
exact replica of your mailbox that is stored on the server? If mine
mailbox is 225MB then the local ost would also be
, June 12, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
I wasn't thinking of the bandwidth side, that's not a problem. Is the
local copy enabled by default? Don't get me wrong, I think it's a very
good design. I was just thinking about using different profiles on the
same PC. If you can
, June 12, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
I wasn't thinking of the bandwidth side, that's not a problem. Is
the
local copy enabled by default? Don't get me wrong, I think it's a
very
good design. I was just thinking about using different profiles on
the
same PC. If you can
:26 PM
Subject: Re: Outlook 2003 Beta 2
'tis too, at least in current builds. AFAIK, it will remain default in later
builds too.
- Original Message -
I dont believe its enabled by default.
- Original Message -
From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
I love the feature and I think your remote users will too. I was getting
way tired of having Outlook hang when I accidentally selected a message with
a large attachment and Oulook tried to retireve it for viewing in the
preview pane.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
13 matches
Mail list logo
