Anyone actually using nemx power tools? I really like Pure Message
so far..
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pure Message from Active State formally perlmx
No product can make
The biggest problem with eManager, and a lot of other content based
anti-spam products is that they have to fully accept the mail before making
the decision that its spam or not. IIRC, PureMessage is based around the
Milter engine, which hooks at the delivery process within sendmail, so it
can
I am actually testing Pure Message in our lab right now and it seems to
work quite well.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 5:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pure Message from Active State formally perlmx
John -
Why do you not like emanager? Problems with it?
Fenton
* www.kathmandukids.org - saving one child at a time **
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Strongosky
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 7:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
that the user decided was not spam.
john
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Fenton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pure Message from Active State formally perlmx
John -
Why do you not like emanager? Problems
but can
any product really make that claim?
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pure Message from Active State formally perlmx
Fenton, yes...such as right out of the box
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Pure Message from Active State formally perlmx
We are currently using e-manger with Virus-Wall 3.5x with only the
defaults and Trends updated SPAM list and it stops about 60,000 UCE
7 matches
Mail list logo
