VPN.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering what others are doing for remote access to
Exchange
2000. Many of my users DO use the OWA but a
:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Remote Access
VPN.
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:10:20 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering what others are doing for remote access
IP issues?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:16:43 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen
right now. I
think we have some political
Intellectual Property.
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
IP issues?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr
How is this affected by using a VPN?
Original message
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:27:30 -0400
From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Remote Access
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intellectual Property.
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
, April 12, 2002 6:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
Oh I forgot to mention that VPN is not going to happen right now. I think
we have some political and IP issues we need to work out first
--
Vincent Avallone
iBiquity Digital
(410) 872-1535
-Original Message-
From
Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc...
You could use TS (terminal services) /Citrix.
bill
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Remote Access
I was wondering what others
How about an 800 number for direct dial-in?
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc...
You could use TS (terminal services
- Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
http://www.tripathimaging.com
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
Umm if you have time/money to burn/hardware/etc...
You could use
How about a VPN??
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security
oriented person is really willing to do. You'd
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security
oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do it under
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
Umm true I do punch the Citrix port in the firewall.
1 port...the citrix client has security. 56 des...it will go to 128 if
you
would like.
true the TS port might be less secure...I mean I trust M$ dont you?
I guess I could get crazy fun...VPN
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
How about a VPN??
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
You still have to punch holes in the FW. Not something any security
oriented person is really willing to do. You'd never get me to do
Hee hee. I do the same thing! Cisco VPN running paralel to the FW. IPSec
client on the desktops.
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
What kind of VPN solution are we
]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP?? LOL! NOT!!
L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT!
I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have to punch holes
in the FW, it runs parallel
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
What kind of VPN solution are we talking about? MS PPTP??
LOL! NOT!! L2TP? NOT! CHAP? NOT!
I like the Cisco VPN concentrators or the like. I don't have
to punch holes in the FW
: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Remote Access
Of course, it comes with its own headaches, but they could be a lot worse
than they are...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
18 matches
Mail list logo
