[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You may be relay free (i.e. a spammer is *not* using your servers as a
relay) but said scumbag is using one of your addresses as a forged From:
address.
1) spammer sends out messages
For those wondering. It's actually from South Park Season 3.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of B. van
Ouwerkerk
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 11:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You don't have to read slashdot
You've lost me. The only South Park I ever heard of is a comedy. I hope you
don't find it fun that ppl are getting NDR's because spammers feel like
forging the FROM.
B.
At 23:56 21-12-2003 -0800, you wrote:
For those wondering. It's actually from South Park Season 3.
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You've lost me. The only South Park I ever heard of is a comedy. I hope you
don't find it fun that ppl are getting NDR's because spammers feel like
forging the FROM.
B.
At 23:56 21-12-2003 -0800, you wrote:
For those wondering. It's actually
No I don't think it's fun that spammers are forging FROM address, but what
are you going to expect from a 20+ year old protocol that wasn't designed to
verify who the sender is?
There is no way you can reliably check who the sender is. At least not
without modifying the protocol. That would take
75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You don't have to read slashdot to know that. I had to apply special rules
to get
, 2003 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
My comment was about his 1,2,3 Profit! Method. That joke has been endlessly
run on slashdot.org postings lately. True, I think that original 1,2,3
Profit! Joke came from Southpark, but I got it from slashdot.
Eric Fretz
L-3
Would be a nice feature in 5.5 if I could turn off NDR's to the internet or
on specific users.
-Original Message-
From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You don't have to read slashdot
, December 22, 2003 9:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
Funny turn of events, I was running down remote users and veryifying strong
passwords when the manager of sales comes in and someone text messaged his
phone with his domain password.
interesting.
-Original Message
You may be relay free (i.e. a spammer is *not* using your servers as a relay)
but said scumbag is using one of your addresses as a forged From: address.
1) spammer sends out messages appearing to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) many many many recipients do not exist
3) receiving mail systems send
Sent: 19 December 2003 14:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You may be relay free (i.e. a spammer is *not* using your
servers as a relay)
but said scumbag is using one of your addresses as a forged
From: address.
1) spammer sends out messages appearing to come
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You may be relay free (i.e. a spammer is *not* using your servers as a
relay) but said scumbag is using one of your addresses as a forged From:
address.
1) spammer sends out messages appearing to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2) many many many recipients do not exist
3
) ???
5) profit!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You may be relay free (i.e. a spammer is *not* using your servers as a
relay)
but said scumbag is using one of your
days trying to send the NDR bounce
to the perceived sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4) ???
5) profit!
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: TONS of NDR's
You may be relay free (i.e
14 matches
Mail list logo
