environment that it won't. Don't try and make it
match in that case.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:julian.stone;netstore.net]
Posted At: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:28 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Validation of migration concept
Subject: RE: Validation
a new environment that it won't. Don't try and make it
match in that case.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:julian.stone;netstore.net]
Posted At: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:28 AM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Validation of migration concept
Subject: RE
Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Validation of migration concept
Which one is better?
making x500 addresses or changing the LegacyExchangeDN field
to look like the DN from Exchange
Discussions
Subject: RE: Validation of migration concept
I'd suggest adding the X500 rather than changing the legacyExchangeDN. Its
probably in that format for a reason.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger
Subject: RE: Validation of migration concept
LegacyExchangeDN in Exchange exists specifically for this
reason - if you want to make an object look like it came from
a legacy Exchange 5.5 server
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent
.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Validation of migration concept
I understand what its there for. I also understand that in the case at hand,
its not working as expected
holy cr@p! you want me to read all that?
Wait 'till I get a bit bored at work :)
-Original Message-
From: Soren Larsen [mailto:SwynkExchangeDiscussionList;vang.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Validation of migration concept
Hello
Having
Then have the people who said to it this way, figure it out. You did it in a
way that most here would not do it.
- Original Message -
From: Soren Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:18 PM
Subject: Validation of migration
If you used the normal method of migration (keeping everything in the same exchange
Org), then people would be able to reply to old messages. This is because the Reply-to
is using the directory name of the recipient as it sees it in the old message.
You could probably use ADSI Edit and assign
9 matches
Mail list logo
