RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-20 Thread Ed Crowley
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 6:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk You're exactly right..that's what happened. I just didn't want to go into explaining all of that. But we cannot as mail

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-19 Thread Bowles, John L.
To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk My company allows them to go out. I don't use the feature at all. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message

Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-19 Thread Andy David
OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk I

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-19 Thread Bowles, John L.
Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause

Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-19 Thread Andy David
Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-19 Thread Bowles, John L.
. __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-19 Thread Darcy Adams
Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk OOFs generally do not cause mail loops unless you are unwisely using a rule. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: RE

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Candee Vaglica
This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Our company is proposing

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Friese, Casey
Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk This might help: http://www.equiinet.com/press/pressreleases/24_06_2002.htm -Original Message- From: Archie Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouut

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread William Lefkovics
too professional to send you an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Friese, Casey
Got to love his wit. I have quite a bit of yours archieved as well -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk That Tom is that rare

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread William Lefkovics
-Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk That Tom is that rare jewel... a wise Texan. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Christopher Hummert
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Cut and cross posted from another list - some good ones to think about Tom Meunier

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Martin Blackstone
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2540307.stm -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk Yea true the local paper just had

Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Daniel Chenault
On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location the person found his address on the web. Since his OOF said he'd be gone for two weeks, out of town on vacation, he essentially is

RE: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk

2002-12-18 Thread Ed Crowley
Chenault Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Ouut Oof Offfice responses - Security Risk On a technical list I'm on that concerns Exchange (among other things) someone forwarded to the list someone's OOF from a major company. From his name and location