Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
That doesn't seem to work either. According to Q253828, the Recipient Update Service
uses the msExchHideFromAddressLists attribute to build address lists and if this is
set to "TRUE", then it's not in an address book and then it ca
have to accept defeat on this one.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
So have you tried the LegacyExchangeDN yet?
-Original Message-
From: Kret
So have you tried the LegacyExchangeDN yet?
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
You are correct with your first statement. We are trying to resolve a
: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now
another problem?
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Your trying to resolve a hidden user. Is that the situation or is this now
another problem?
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Actually I'm tryi
You can find LegacyExchangeDN using the ADSI Edit from Windows 2000 Support Tools.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
LegacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: Kretche
LegacyExchangeDN
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished
Name. Is it possible
Give them a bogus name until you can switch it, like Temp1, Temp2.
Just an idea.
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Not really an option for 300 users
Not really an option for 300 users and mandatory profiles. Thought about doing it
though.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Unhide the mailbox and
Unhide the mailbox and then do it. Then hide it again.
-Original Message-
From: Kretche, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
Actually I'm trying to resolve the mailbox when the
't work and I was wondering if anyone found a workaround for this.
-Pete
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Resolve hidden users
You mean when you type an address in the to
, September 23, 2002 6:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Resolve hidden users
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the
Distinguished Name. Is it possible to do something similar with
Exchange 2000? We have students who for one reason or another do not
want to have
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished
Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students
who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in
the GAL. So far, I've only found articles
In Exchange 5.5 it was possible to resolve a hidden user based on the Distinguished
Name. Is it possible to do something similar with Exchange 2000? We have students
who for one reason or another do not want to have their e-mail address published in
the GAL. So far, I've only found articles
14 matches
Mail list logo
