RE: ADC Problem
What you need to do is set the ADC Connection Agreement to connect to the Exchange 2000 server in the site you are trying import the object in to. It should be running the SRS (Site Replication Service) if it's the only Exchange 2000 server in that site. If you have more than one Exchange 2000 server in the site make sure to configure the ADC CA to connect to the Exchange 2000 box running the SRS. By default the SRS get installed on the first Exchange 2000 box installed into a 5.5 site, after the first one you must manually install it if you want to add another instance. Here is what is happening Exchange 5.5 can not accept the replication because it found the object in a part of the 5.5 directory that it does not have authority over, i.e. another site. This is by design in 5.5, the SRS runs a shadow 5.5 directory so that the exchange 2000 server can participate in intra site replication. The difference is that the Exchange 2000 shadow directory has read and write authority to whole directory. This way you can replicate information in to the site via the a ADC CA to the SRS server and it will take care of replicating it to the 5.5 servers in the site. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Problem That is correct. I have an Exchange 5.5 site w/an E2k server inside this site that runs the ADC. I'm trying to replicate a container object from another E2k site to my 5.5 site and I keep receiving that error message. Does that answer your question? John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Problem The object that AD is trying to replicate is to exist in an Exchange site other than where the ADC exists, is that correct? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ADC Problem All, I'm trying to replicate an object from W2k into a container in our Exchange 5.5 server. But I keep getting this error message in the even log. Any ideas? The ADC cannot replicate user. The site that the object belongs in is read only on the connected Exchange 5.5 server. If another connection agreement can replicate this object to a 5.5 server in the correct site, then ignore the message. John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving 45 users between sites
There is no known way to do this without them knowing of the change unless you can get to their workstations and update their profiles while they aren't looking. Even then, they'll lose stuff like rules and out of office settings. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving 45 users between sites Hello. I need to move 45 users from one site to another site, within the same Org (all is 5.5, SP4). The built-in move mailbox wizard works within site. The exmerge will export to .pst, thus, the users will loose their ID in the exchange org... What is the best way to accomplish this? I would like them not to feel this move. (I know I will need to re-build their profile). Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ban Outlook?
As I sit in my home in the beautiful San Francisco Bay Area working on my IBM Aptiva 233MHz client machine and my farm of eMachines-based and no-name-clone servers, I realize that throwing away lots of money on snazzy equipment doesn't elevate one from the status of moron. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Friese, Casey Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? Anyone else think it's extremely funny that the guy writing this article has all of that equipment in his house. ...as I sit in my home in the Blue Ridge Mountains, looking over my NetScreen-10 Firewall Appliance log, I can see the number of attacks on my network rise above twenty--and that's just for today. Norton Anti-Virus for Gateways reports that three Nimda-infected messages have been blasted so far as they tried to reach my Ipswitch mail server. -Original Message- From: Murphy, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? I prefer Outlook. I use a policy to keep it locked down on the client side. I don't believe that the problem stems from the creation of Outlook. The problem is that some admins are not pro-active. Others are simply too busy or overworked. I think most engineers know what to do they just have a hard time keeping up with everything. Especially when you a one man/woman (person?) shop! (I'll use myself as an example). -Original Message- From: Dean, Nathaniel, V. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ban Outlook? This has been talked about before. Whatever is the dominant application will see the dominant hacks, security holes and have viruses written just for them. If your users are satisfied with the free products that are out then use them. We used pegasus mail back in the early 90's... -Original Message- From: Steve Dallas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ban Outlook? Anyone care to comment? http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2814683,00.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tape Storage (nuke protection)
Three. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tape Storage (nuke protection) Mr. Owl, how many licks does it take to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop ? -Original Message- From: MS Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tape Storage (nuke protection) Hello, To Hi-jack this thread: Does anyone now the distance your Off-Site Tapes should be from your production site to be immune from the EMP effects of a suit case nuke (say one capable of a 10 Kilo-ton blast), and exploded from an airline 20-40K feet? From Quantum http://www.quantum.com/NR/rdonlyres/0223zfbgjbxzcvdmecdk/dlttapemedia.pd f DLT tape magnetic properties: Coercivity (Oe) 1540 Remanence (G) 2,600 Someone care to do the math/physics that a distance X from the blast would keep the EMP effects below 1/2 that of the Coercivity of DLT? Thanks, Brent -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 6:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tape Storage Fire-proof site every time for us. In a separate building on site for the 'keep to hand ones' and completely off-site for the rest (archives and all that). Shelves aren't that good in a fire!! Tris -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 November 2001 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Tape Storage Here's a somewhat off-topic question. How do you store your tapes? We have a small network, and a lot of backup tapes. I know many of you have larger networks than we do, so must have a sh*tpile of tapes. How do you store them? Right now ours are just laying on a table (except for the off-site ones). It'd be nice to have some kind of wall-mounted shelf that allowed for some organization, yet would still keep them handy. Does anybody have a good source? Thanks, Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Moore Network Administrator The Agnes Irwin School [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Mail Not Arriving at Specific Domains
I would use nslookup on each SMTP server to see if the DNS you're using finds correct information for these e-mail domains. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jiong Hwa, Yee Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet Mail Not Arriving at Specific Domains Hi, I have an EXch5.5(SP3) on NT that forwards all o/going mail to a NT-host running InterScan VWall. This host receives mail and checked if ok will forward it over to the EXch5.5(Sp3) box. Connectivity to internet is fine as can be seen that mail can be sent to all other domains and mails are arriving as well. However, 2 domains that I can never mail to are : [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using a mail account at lycosasia.com I can send it to myself but not from my company to lycosasia.com. DNS is checked but your suggestion would be over much help as I am still resolving this having been at it for 4 weeks now. I must add that it was ok at one time. My domain is not registered as having been a spamming site though it was at one stage ... 2 yr back. Anh info is much appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jiong _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade and move
I didn't read a problem in your questions, just a lot of questions that indicated you needed a grounding in fundamental concepts. For that, start with Tony Redmond's book. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Louanne Fournier Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade and move Could you suggest one that deals with my situation directly? I willing to do the reading/work/searching. I just haven't been able to find anything that describes my particular upgrade problem. Louanne -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrade and move You've just asked what I call a consulting engagement question. Someone could write a book on this topic. In fact, several people have. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Louanne Fournier Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrade and move Hi, I have a question about my upgrade to Exchange 2k. I am sure this is probably documented somewhere but I can't seem to find anything that details this specifically. We are not only upgrading our Exchange but upgrading our Win NT machines to W2k. We have 10 servers in total. I have two new servers, which I am using to test the upgrade of W2k and Exchange 2k. I have started from scratch, built these two machines with the same domain name and machine names as my PDC and Exchange Server in my live system. Here comes the question: I am going to install Exchange and then move the mailboxes over. To move the mailboxes over does my old Exchange Server have to be part of my new test domain? If so could I temporarily move my Exchange server to the new domain, do the migration of mailboxes etc and then move it back to my live system? Am I over complicating things here? Thanks in advance! Regards, Louanne Fournier, MCSE, MCT Options Software Consulting Voice: 905-681-2100 x 213 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP, the email security management gateway. Mail essentials adds content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus, attachment compression, personalised auto responders, archiving and more to your Microsoft Exchange Server or SMTP mail server. For more information visit http://www.mailessentials.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This mail was processed by Mail essentials for Exchange/SMTP, the email security management gateway. Mail essentials adds content checking, email encryption, anti spam, anti virus, attachment compression, personalised auto responders, archiving and more to your Microsoft Exchange Server or SMTP mail server. For more information visit http://www.mailessentials.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Appending Text to Outbound E-Mail in Exchange 2000
Some of the ideas in the FAQ will work for Exchange 2000 as well. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dominic Lanza Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Appending Text to Outbound E-Mail in Exchange 2000 Is there any way to append a text message to all out bound email for Exchange 2000? I know that it was possible in Exchange 5.5 using Imcext.dll. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lotus Notes
Its Achilles heel is that it uses the Notes client. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eric Cooper Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Lotus Notes Allows you to send messages (ie, Connect) between the two systems. It's also possible to replicate directory between the two systems over the Notes Connector. It's useful in heterogeneous environments or during a migration from one system (Notes) to the other (Exchange). Eric - Original Message - From: Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:11 PM Subject: Lotus Notes What functionality does the Lotus Notes connector provide? We have a Notes box and we are thinking about setting up an Exchange 2k box, for various reasons, and wondering what type of functionality the connector provides. Thanks, Mike Carlson http://www.domitianx.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Master Of The Spoon People Keeper Of None _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move Exchnage to server w/ same name
Add an alias DNS and/or WINS address pointing the old address to the new server. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Move Exchnage to server w/ same name Because I wan't it to . . .no . no . .some programmers have hard coded some programs to use the server by name. And what w\you are saying is I need some down time! - Original Message - From: Missy Koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:23 PM Subject: Re: Move Exchnage to server w/ same name The real question is why does the server name need to be the same? But, to answer your original question, you restore Exchange to the new server. Missy - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:16 PM Subject: Re: Move Exchnage to server w/ same name If you have a server Win 2K w/ Exchnage 5.5 and want to move it to another, better, system smae config. but you want the name of the server to remain the same what could you do? I'm stuck! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Latin Lesson
If alias was a Latin word the plural would not be alii. While alias has a Latin derivation it is not a latin word as such. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Latin Lesson Tom, vir = is interchangeable with viri except when you specifically want to imply multiples. There is no such word in Latin as alii. So (altho' not sure, I would say that alias is not derived from the Latin meaning the same) No-one was insisting on using anything. You are the first. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - Latin Lesson While we're picking nits. vir = man viri = men or venoms, the latter being so rare a usage as to never have appeared outside of academic circles, long after Latin had become a solely academic language. Ob Exchange Topic: I suggest hereafter we pedants demand alii rather than aliases, if we're going to be so snooty as to insist on not using viruses when speaking English. At least that is well-known, well-documented Latin, as seen in Cicero, Ovid, et alii. :) -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: OT - Latin Lesson Actually Ed, you're a little out .., Viri = A man (usually of Honour) Same word for singular and plural. One phrase no classics student is ever going to forget! Especially anyone who had doings with Homer. (Bart...!) Virui = To be green or verdant; be lively or vigorous; be full of youth. (Just like this list!) This is where the English virulent (with a bit of intervention from German and its meaning taken as strong and dangerous) comes from and this is how the word virus made it into the English language... and to bring this topic back to slightly On T., also became the widespread phenomenon we know and love today. References taken from: A History of the English Language. Albert C. Baugh Thomas somebody-or-other. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson As was the 'u' before the 'ii'. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP snip -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson Tom, Oops the second 'i' was a mistake..but you are perfectly right If you are going to be really pedantic, the latin for Viruses is Irusesvavy or somesuch. I don't vouch for the spelling as it is 6 years since I last read Latin. If you have the time and the inclination, you can research it on: http://www.quicklatin.com/. I'm off to catch the train home :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson Alumnus. Alumni. NOT Alumnuii. Incubus. Incubi. NOT Incubuii. Virus. Viri. NOT Viruii. NOT virii. Viruses is proper English. Viri is proper Latin. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson In Latin, the multiple of Virus is Viruii In English, the multiple is Viruses. So you are both right as well as pedantic :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! Actually I think it is Virii -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! amateur grammar police Get the virus's what? Oh, you mean viruses. /amateur grammar police :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Latin Lesson
Well I would have been right were virus a Latin word. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Farrell Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Latin Lesson Actually Ed, you're a little out .., Viri = A man (usually of Honour) Same word for singular and plural. One phrase no classics student is ever going to forget! Especially anyone who had doings with Homer. (Bart...!) Virui = To be green or verdant; be lively or vigorous; be full of youth. (Just like this list!) This is where the English virulent (with a bit of intervention from German and its meaning taken as strong and dangerous) comes from and this is how the word virus made it into the English language... and to bring this topic back to slightly On T., also became the widespread phenomenon we know and love today. References taken from: A History of the English Language. Albert C. Baugh Thomas somebody-or-other. Regards E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson As was the 'u' before the 'ii'. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP snip -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson Tom, Oops the second 'i' was a mistake..but you are perfectly right If you are going to be really pedantic, the latin for Viruses is Irusesvavy or somesuch. I don't vouch for the spelling as it is 6 years since I last read Latin. If you have the time and the inclination, you can research it on: http://www.quicklatin.com/. I'm off to catch the train home :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson Alumnus. Alumni. NOT Alumnuii. Incubus. Incubi. NOT Incubuii. Virus. Viri. NOT Viruii. NOT virii. Viruses is proper English. Viri is proper Latin. -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! grammar lesson In Latin, the multiple of Virus is Viruii In English, the multiple is Viruses. So you are both right as well as pedantic :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! Actually I think it is Virii -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! amateur grammar police Get the virus's what? Oh, you mean viruses. /amateur grammar police :-) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 Remote connection Question
You can't do that with Exchange 5.5 as POP3 is handled by the store, meaning the mailbox has to be on the server doing the POP3 protocol handling. With Exchange 2000, you can implement a front-end server to handle POP3 and put it in the DMZ. But that's costly because you have to license Exchange 2000 Enterprise for that front-end server, and I'm not really convinced that it buys you much security-wise. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Remote connection Question Have a customer that requested that 2 servers be set up. 1 behind a firewall, a.k.a. not reachable from the Internet 2 on a public IP that accepts mail and allows POP3 connections to it, so that only 1 mail server is Accessible via the internet. It was also requested that the system, accessible via the internet, NOT have any mailboxes. I know I'm gunna' hear it about this. I am just asking because I only know how to make POP3 work on the server w/ mailboxes, I heard something about MTA and x.400 address and a script from their administrator but he did not know much more about it. Thanks again! - Original Message - From: kim cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: RE: POP3 Remote connection Question no. yes. and could you explain why you'd want to do this? then we'll know where to tell you to read up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: POP3 Remote connection Question Is it possible to setup a second server for POP3 connections and allow users to connect to that, if it contains no mailboxes? Or do you need to physically have the mailboxes on the same server. What is this called? Where could I read up on this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: decommissioning E2K cluster
Deinstall Exchange 2000 from it. That should remove everything from the directory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 4:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: decommissioning E2K cluster Any gotcha's, etc, for turning off an E2K cluster in a mixed site? All mailboxes except system and smtp have been moved, and there are no public folders homed on the server. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IMS questions
Thanks all for the advice. I have removed the address space and re-calculated the routing table and restarted services. Guess we have to wait a while now to see if the problem is fixed :) thanks Dave -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 16 November 2001 23:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS questions Removing the address space completely (no address space) is far more efficient way of dealing with your problem. The removal of the address space will result in your IMS being removed form the routing table (an advantage in a complex environment) while still allowing the IMS to receive mail. Setting the IMS to inbound or Both will allow the IMS to receive but because it is not in the routing table it wouldn't be used to route a message externally. Mike -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 November 2001 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IMS questions Ahh, the joys of Inbound Only and Outbound Only IMCs... A few issues here. First, as you've found, the Inbound Only setting doesn't do a whole lot of anything. Its a strange bug that never seemed to get fixed, but the work arounds are simple. Second, since you're dealing with site routing (multiple sites), part of the issue here is that, for its given address space (on the Address SPace tab - and it is most likely * [wildcard]), this IMC is the lowest cost path out. Keep in mind that since the Inbound only setting doesn't cut it, cost will count. By default, all connectors have a cost of 1, and all costs are additive. In other words, assuming all your connectors have costs of 1, the IMC on the other side of the X.400 link will have an apparent cost of 2 for the users on this box (1 for the IMC and 1 for the X.400), while this one is costed at one. The maximum cost is 100, so go ahead and set it to 100 (Address Space Tab). Third, mail routing will happen via the most specific match of address space, with * being the least specific. Another method (and more foolproof than adjusting the cost) is to set this IMC with an address space that cannot be matched, which will result in it never getting selected. For historical reasons, the easiest way to ensure this is to change the address space for the connector from * to clownpenis.fart. After making any of these changes, you need to restart the service for the change to take effect. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IMS questions Hi all, I need a bit of help! We've recently added an IMS connector to one of our servers and configured it for Incoming only. An SMTP relay server then pokes mail through port 25 to pass to exchange mail boxes. This all works ok and was created soley to receive mail from a new e-banking network. The problem is that outgoing SMTP addressed mail should NOT go to the IMS, since it should use our x400 backbone. This is because there is no Internet connection available for the connector yet. Over the last week or so, users have started complaining that Internet mail is not getting out. Tracking specific messages show that the mail appears to hit the IMS. Since it has no Internet connection it cannot go anywhere. However, other messages successfully hit the X400 and get out to the Internet as planned. My questions are thus: I have enabled logging on the IMS, but where do they get stored? Event logs have nothing. Can the tracking.logs be interpreted by an application to make them easier to understand? Why would any mail hit the IMs at all if it is configured for Inbound only? Under the Address Space Tab, we set the cost to 100 and the scope to Location. I just read about troubleshooting outgoing mail, and it mentioned that if Address is too restrictive it will play a part. It suggests setting t to *. * is the default and is what ours was. Thinking this might be a key, I have set it to a fictitious domain of .nowhereatall. My thinking is that any mail NOT destined for .nowhereatall will automatically be routed via x400 and not IMS. Does this sound correct? What do the Delivery Restrictions do/apply to? I could accept mail from no-one, but would this affect the incoming from e-banking? If anyone has any ideas, please advise. We're running Exchange 5.5 (Enterprise) SP3 on NT4 SP5 cheers Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend
Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000)
Gurus, We run Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with NT4.0 clients running Outlook 2000. I have a user who wants to share an e-mail folder OTHER than his inbox with his secretary. He already has his inbox shared with her (right-click, permissions, blah blah blah). We can share this folder accordingly, but the other user has no way to connect to it. When the secretary goes to open (File, open, other user's folder) all she has is a list of inbox, calendar, etc... and there is no way to stipulate the other folder (path or otherwise). Can you suggest a way for her to access this folder? All help is appreciated. Thanks in advance, \\themolk. [Steve Molkentin] [IT Trainer/HelpDesk] [Forest Lake College The Springfield College] [D/Dial - 07 3372 0819] [Mobile - 0410 680 018] Visit our Colleges on the Internet: http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au http://www.extraordinarykids.com.au _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000)
Give the user read permission on the Outlook Today - [Mailbox - Shmoe, Joe] object, then have her add the mailbox using tools, services, properties msexchange server advanced add. -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 7:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000) Gurus, We run Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with NT4.0 clients running Outlook 2000. I have a user who wants to share an e-mail folder OTHER than his inbox with his secretary. He already has his inbox shared with her (right-click, permissions, blah blah blah). We can share this folder accordingly, but the other user has no way to connect to it. When the secretary goes to open (File, open, other user's folder) all she has is a list of inbox, calendar, etc... and there is no way to stipulate the other folder (path or otherwise). Can you suggest a way for her to access this folder? All help is appreciated. Thanks in advance, \\themolk. [Steve Molkentin] [IT Trainer/HelpDesk] [Forest Lake College The Springfield College] [D/Dial - 07 3372 0819] [Mobile - 0410 680 018] Visit our Colleges on the Internet: http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au http://www.extraordinarykids.com.au _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000)
In exchange admin, go to the Permissions Tab for the user and add his secretary with user permissions. On the secretary's profile add her boss's mailbox. The secretary gets more than just this one folder but in my experience, they usually request the others later... Scott -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 18, 2001 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000) Gurus, We run Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with NT4.0 clients running Outlook 2000. I have a user who wants to share an e-mail folder OTHER than his inbox with his secretary. He already has his inbox shared with her (right-click, permissions, blah blah blah). We can share this folder accordingly, but the other user has no way to connect to it. When the secretary goes to open (File, open, other user's folder) all she has is a list of inbox, calendar, etc... and there is no way to stipulate the other folder (path or otherwise). Can you suggest a way for her to access this folder? All help is appreciated. Thanks in advance, \\themolk. [Steve Molkentin] [IT Trainer/HelpDesk] [Forest Lake College The Springfield College] [D/Dial - 07 3372 0819] [Mobile - 0410 680 018] Visit our Colleges on the Internet: http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au http://www.extraordinarykids.com.au _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000)
IMHO the last thing the delegator would want the delegate to see is drafts and sent items. But I guess you could tell the user not to look, cuz that always works. -Original Message- From: Scott Perley-TM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 9:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000) In exchange admin, go to the Permissions Tab for the user and add his secretary with user permissions. On the secretary's profile add her boss's mailbox. The secretary gets more than just this one folder but in my experience, they usually request the others later... Scott -Original Message- From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 18, 2001 8:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sharing an e-mail folder for another user (Outlook 2000) Gurus, We run Exchange 5.5 on NT4.0 with NT4.0 clients running Outlook 2000. I have a user who wants to share an e-mail folder OTHER than his inbox with his secretary. He already has his inbox shared with her (right-click, permissions, blah blah blah). We can share this folder accordingly, but the other user has no way to connect to it. When the secretary goes to open (File, open, other user's folder) all she has is a list of inbox, calendar, etc... and there is no way to stipulate the other folder (path or otherwise). Can you suggest a way for her to access this folder? All help is appreciated. Thanks in advance, \\themolk. [Steve Molkentin] [IT Trainer/HelpDesk] [Forest Lake College The Springfield College] [D/Dial - 07 3372 0819] [Mobile - 0410 680 018] Visit our Colleges on the Internet: http://www.forestlakecollege.com.au http://www.thespringfieldcollege.com.au http://www.extraordinarykids.com.au _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving 45 users between sites
Exmerge should be able to move rules etc if the option Associated folder messages is selected. Mike -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2001 23:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving 45 users between sites There is no known way to do this without them knowing of the change unless you can get to their workstations and update their profiles while they aren't looking. Even then, they'll lose stuff like rules and out of office settings. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving 45 users between sites Hello. I need to move 45 users from one site to another site, within the same Org (all is 5.5, SP4). The built-in move mailbox wizard works within site. The exmerge will export to .pst, thus, the users will loose their ID in the exchange org... What is the best way to accomplish this? I would like them not to feel this move. (I know I will need to re-build their profile). Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
