Tumbleweed rocks.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
Yep exactly Andrey, we use it here very successfully for about 16K users.
Anthony L. Sollars
Technology
I just got rolled with about nine OOFS.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
Really? I thought it rolled.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL
Mighty Hercules will suffice.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
Should we call you Dave or David?
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL
No idea.
http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/products/appliance_edition.html
But, they are pricey for sure. Securemail will run you about 10k.
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yep. They changed to that about a year ago. Not sure if that applies to
appliances however.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
IIRC they've changed their pricing structure from per seat to
You mean, other than by simply opening their mailbox and searching through
the message bodies? Not in 5.5, unless you have been journaling. You can
search by subject with ISSCAN or Exmerge.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29,
Notepad
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Encryption packages
Scott,
What software package was chosen to do the encryption?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From:
Doesn't help much after the fact though does it?
-Original Message-
From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
Build a specific signature that look for the
Sounds like you need bigger drives! Not sure why you want to run eseutil.
How much space are you going to reclaim if you do?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2K
Other than 0! g
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this
Ot
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Limits
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question.
Im still not clear how liability relates to brick level backups.
-Original Message-
From: Kelly M. Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachment Exclusions During Backups?
Ed,
I fully support your position
. Let everyone get used to the idea that if they don't listen to
voice mail right away, they lose it.
You probably wouldn't want to do that every day, though.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:58 AM
Posted To: MS
OWA/VPN or leave the messages on the Exch Server.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange on the road
I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange
And Scrappy Doo.
-Original Message-
From: Kevinm[MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange on the road
There is also IMAP.
-- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Mongo change ISP.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
I would if I could.
Earthlink does NOT offer a static IP for cable
.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Mongo change ISP.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Underwood [mailto:[EMAIL
Check to see if your local hosts file has a bunch of bogus entries.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus with XP
My home computer (window XP) was infected with virus and I clean
While I agree with what you are saying in regards to personal folders, IIRC,
after (30 min?), the open file handle closes on psts and you can back them
up!
-Original Message-
From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:19 AM
To: Exchange
Administrator
Ohio Dominican University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 614-251-4515
F: 614-252-2650
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
While I agree with what you are saying
?
Or are you saying that after 30 minutes of attempting to back them up, the
open file handle closes, thereby allowing Veritas to back it up correctly?
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 6:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Could be any number of things.
Search in Technet for an article called Troubleshooting High CPU
Utilization By Store.exe and see if that points to anything useful.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:51 AM
To: Exchange
the
file lock on a .pst file.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST-file backup problem
Not sure on the period of inactivity on the part of the user,
but, yea, something like
Set the Deleted Item Retention time for messages to 0 and IS maintenance to
always and let that puppy run for awhile. Also, check the 1221 events in
the app log and see how much space has been freed up. The 1221's will give
you the min amount you can reclaim after defragging with eseutil again.
If you do a search on 0x800CCC0F in Technet, Im betting there are more
suggestions than just turning off email scanning to resolve the issue.
Otherwise, I would crank up transport logging :
(Tools/Options/Other/Advanced Options) and see if that reveals anything
worthwhile.
-Original
And if your client suppresses read receipts, the sender will never get any
notifications at all!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Question about Email Notification
The
lol
-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns?
Greetings,
2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4.
I'm trying to figure out a way to shut down my IMS connector at night to
Specifically:
net stop MSExchangeSA /y
( 3 times)
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Scheduled service shutdowns?
As another note...I seem to remember that IF you are going
?
Andy shouldn't that be
(remember click your heals together 3 times and repeat)
net stop MSExchangeIMC /y
since he only wanted the IMC?
bill
Wouldn't net stop MSExchangeSA /y take down basically all of exchange
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Does the dev server have McAfee installed on it as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 SP4 Patch KB829418 - STORE.EXE GPF
I have applied recent MS Patch
Its hidden. Change the options in Explorer to see it.
You can change the default location simply by browsing to a new location
within Outlook and saving the attachment there. That new path will be saved.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Crank up logging!
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Woes
Exchange 5.5/4/Win2000/4.
About 1 week ago I started having problems e-mailing users @verizon.net
(206.46.170.12).
It will let you see the actual SMTP conversation.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Woes
Andy, I'll give that a shot but will that tell me more than the error
message in
If you have message tracking enabled, you can search by message ID.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: message retrieval
How can I retrieve a message from the server using the
1960? Are you sure? That's 5.5 w/o any service pack.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 3:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Sorry, 5.5 Build 1960.5.
-Original
]
Sent: 01 December 2003 13:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
Living dangerously, eh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
5.5 Enterprise also includes additional connectors.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Private Store size problems.
Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [EX55] Mailbox Move
Does the Mailbox Move function of Exchange 5.5 perserve single instance
storage?
K
Stop doing BLBs..Or at the very minimum, upgrade Veritas to at least 8.6.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 5:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate)
Do a full, online backup of the store ASAP with either Veritas or NTBACKUP.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
I've inherited this IT environment and
You can not do a complete Exchange restore with BLBs. You must/should do a
full online backup of the DS and IS.
Install the Exch Admin gui on a remote W2k machine and back it up to disk.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:01
I dont think this will reduce unwanted email.
-Original Message-
From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Single Use E-Mail?
I'd like to allow my users to create a single use e-mail address to help
Fulls are always preferred. Additionally, online backups perform checksum
validity checks of the database.
You should test your backups frequently on your DR server as well. How do
you know you are getting a good backup otherwise?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL
Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
While most any other system is quite happy with incremental backups,
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Use Perf Optimizer and move the edb files to the new drive.
-Original Message-
From: Jees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk
Hi guys,
Will be gratefull if you can contribute to
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 7:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup rituals
Incrementals flush the logs. Differentials do not.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
He'll still need a profile however.
Will profinst work on E2003? Not sure.
http://download.microsoft.com/download/exch50/Utility/1/NT4/EN-US/Profinst.e
xe
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: [ex55] Two servers in one domain 1 in another, same site
Do all the exchange servers in a site have to be in the same domain? All
our
Shouldn't the ISA server be in the DMZ?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and SMTP
Don't they show ISA in there as well?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Have you tried creating a new Outlook profile? Removing and re-adding the
Outlook Address Book?
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Mazzotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: removal of first exchange 2000 server
I have
Huh?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Active Directory
When we installed Active Directory, a lot of permission didn't carry over.
Has anyone had that problem.
Thank you
Did you re-install the backup agents after installing the hotfixes to all
the servers?
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Exmerge
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Snooping
Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data
for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted
.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping
Exmerge
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL
Any AV software running on the Exch Server?
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources
Just tried that and it did not work...
Any other
Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources
Any AV software running on the Exch Server?
-Original
Ok now can you expand on that Groupshield has been on this machine
for over a year and we are just recently experiencing the problem
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
Are you exporting the subcontainers as well?
Your export.ini should look something like this:
basepoint=/o=yourorgname
exportobject=mailbox
informationlevel=full
subcontainers=yes
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
May want to look at slipstick and see if anything fits the bill.
http://www.slipstick.com/calendar/olpubcal.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Calendar
I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both
I can moonwalk.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a brain
seizure.
The
What do the firewall logs show?
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
Hi,
Running MS Exchange Server 5.5 SP4 on Windows NT4
Single server
, just blocked websites and such, they arent very
detailed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: 11 December 2003 16:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP Not Reaching Exchange Server
What do the firewall logs show
Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Some more information on Professional Ethic
http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/professional/lecture_professionsprofessionaliz
Im Dr. Love.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Actually, degree DOES equal title.
One day, I am just ordinary old Jim Blunt. The next
Pepsi.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Interestingly enough you state that you are a professional and yet make a
statement like that. I in no way have attacked you and
...
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Im Dr. Love
I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to
Good choice. The doctor has the same hairline and legs as you.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ed. You're Julie, the coked up cruise
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/sbs/upgrade/default.mspx
Scroll down.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Seeking documentation
Thanks for reading. I am looking into
Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
Actually, its one copy per server
to say that, didn't they... :P
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
Well, to be nit-picky, its one copy per mailbox store
Poor Admin Practices : 90%
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Sources of outages
Regarding general sources of corporate computing outages, these figures seem
to be accurate.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;149447
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Command line directory export of GAL container
How does one export the contents of
Those are temp files. They should be deleted by the store at some point
during normal processing.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IFS
Help,
Under the folder mdbdata there is
Those html files are your .stm files. Leave them be!
-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Priv.edb
Its not a large system and as i say its running SBS 2000. So, i will leave
of circular
Did they recently change their passwords?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 permissions error
We have several users that are all of a sudden receiving this error
Sounds kinky.
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Connectors in 5.5 and 2K
SRS uses X.400, in its own way, right?
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta
As a Microsoft Partner, does your company get any freebies?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Alright, this is a good question. Bottom line is
http://www.express-soft.com/mailmate/clickyes.html
http://www.dimastr.com/redemption/
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Automating email via Exchange
You know, this is the
somewhere more appropriate. If this
forum were moderated these people would have received warnings by now.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
You can
Is the store growing rapidly as well?
Verify you arent allowing auto-replies to the Internet and that if you are
running AV software on the server, you arent scanning the exch dirs.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:19
. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W2K3/E2K3 JUST UPGRADED TRANSACTION LOGS GROWING
files?
I've never done that because I've always known better.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:44
Domainprep needs to be run in the root domain as well.
That being said, I was under the impression that the Exchange services group
wasn't created unless the ADC was already installed.
-Original Message-
From: Klosa, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:58
If it never leaves the IMS, I don't think it will. If there is a
restriction on the remote server, it shouldnt be sitting in the IMS
anyway, it should simply bounce back to the sender almost immediately after
the remote server denies the connection.
-Original Message-
From: Scott
I saw that delay in the early beta versions of Outlook 2003.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode
I don't know what is happening but I have
Was RC1 standard and the RTM Enterprise?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade from 2003 RC1
I recently asked this question at microsoft.public.exchange.admin, and
failing
If two people make and save changes to the same open document, don't the
owners of the PF get a conflict message in their inboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Jason Clishe
Subject:
, apparently.
- Original Message -
From: David, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:49 AM
Subject: RE: Upgrade from 2003 RC1
Was RC1 standard and the RTM Enterprise?
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/features/win_compare.asp
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: exchange2003 features in a Windows2000AD
Hi all,
What do
You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity Laws
of IT Ethics.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 8:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
Cheers Robert as I
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Dual Processor EXCH2K/SVR2K
You are not allowed to thank Robert per the Decklerheitsgebot Purity
Laws of IT Ethics.
-Original Message-
From
Check permissions, if they look ok, make sure the read-only attrib isnt set
on that pst.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 10:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Personal folders
Does anyone know when
There is a post SP3 fix for this. Alternatively, you could stop and restart
the store.
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Schilbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Sizes
Hi All,
Can someone tell me why it
Nope. Once you moved the mailbox, anything recoverable in the DIR bin got
whacked. You will have to restore from backup.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recover deleted items
So sad.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recover deleted items after moving between storage
groups/servers
Too bad.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
Did ya use the DumpsterAlwaysOn trick via Outlook? Otherwise, it's a full
restore unless you have been doing mailbox level backups of some sort.
Personally, I have never seen emails just disappear.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 02,
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo