RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
4 Primary IS Servers totalling 224GB of IS. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 02:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? 4 Primary IS Servers totalling 100GB of IS. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Nope - I keep mine around 60mb -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? And that mailbox is yours isn't it... :P -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? 70GB store, 2GB largest mailbox. -Original Message- From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I have a customer (7 sites 5.5SP4) whose IS on one server has just nudged 60Gb. -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 12:40 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? We're running 13.6GB on the main box with 24GB total for our site[1]. The 279meg box belongs to the HMFIC himself so that ain't changing soon. There's no telling how large the psts's are though[3]. [1] I don't EVEN want to know what the rest of the organization is looking like[2]. [2] Admin is showing 5.0 servers out there still... [3] We had a tradition of lousy customer service[4], so moving people from pst's is not yet a battle worth fighting[5]. [4] Getting that boat turned around has been a slow process, but we've made about 170 of the 180 degree turn ... YEA!!! [5] Nice thing about working in the military is that users are, generally speaking, use to having to take care of themselves. (i.e. if they didn't back up their own pst's, they know, their on their own) John -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? Come on fess up, what's the biggest? Biggest IS here is 41GB, mailbox is 1.4GB. -Peter -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 14:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? 39/30=1.3 gig average size. 500 would be the smallest in that world??? Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? 39 users 30 GB largest mail box 500MB, it's a sales guy, he said his delete button is missing. -Original Message- From: Jason Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? I'm curious about the size of people's information store on exchange 5.5 and the largest mailbox Also: Does anybody know if issues when the IS get's really large or if a single mailbox get's really large? Total IS size: 18GB Largest mailbox 2GB No issues yet. Thanks - Jason _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free
Exchange clustering
Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
Sander, Many thanks for your reply. I'm looking at it now and I'll report back :-) All the best Joe -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 07:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Hi Joe Try this link for some info on Exchange 2000 Clusters. http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246265.html Hope this helps Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
Being a man of wisdom, perhaps expand on that? I'm only really interested in it - I look after a system which someone else set up. Would like to learn it myself for future reference that's all. Thanks Joe -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 08:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
Thanks to all for your input. It is most appreciated :-) I'm actually researching it both for myself and for an idea based around running exchange and doing some wild and wacky things with it. The system is being designed to take some serious load. I think the team are under the impression that to handle a huge amount of users and transactions more than one server is needed. Is this a logical approach or are they being muppets? Cheers Joe! -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Interesting you should say that... I am grappling with this issue right now... the rest of my organization is pushing for Exchange on clustering... from what I have been able to gather it really only protects you from hardware failures and adds another layer of complication to the server... can you give me some excerpts from this 'upcoming book'? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
Hi Andy, I'm not entirely sure - it's very technical however I hope to have a rough idea of the system components with regard to Exchange by tomorrow. I'll add them to this thread and see if anyone understands, because I probably will not :-) All the best Joe! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering It depends...More info would be needed and of course it also depends on who the muppets are (I worry about Bert and Ernie myself) Andy -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Thanks to all for your input. It is most appreciated :-) I'm actually researching it both for myself and for an idea based around running exchange and doing some wild and wacky things with it. The system is being designed to take some serious load. I think the team are under the impression that to handle a huge amount of users and transactions more than one server is needed. Is this a logical approach or are they being muppets? Cheers Joe! -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 14:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Interesting you should say that... I am grappling with this issue right now... the rest of my organization is pushing for Exchange on clustering... from what I have been able to gather it really only protects you from hardware failures and adds another layer of complication to the server... can you give me some excerpts from this 'upcoming book'? Thanks. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: public schools, gov e-mail
With regard to SendMail, IIRC it records logs regarding the transaction (IP's, To/From etc) but does not keep the body of the message. It's designed to be quick and efficient - having it log every single tx/rx would be inefficient, but it is possible to enable it. Rgds.. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 October 2001 05:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: public schools, gov e-mail I'd see what FIOA has to say about it, although States have different (stricter) laws than the feds in many cases. But the real question is what constitutes an official record. When I was a fed (2 years ago), most email was not considered an official record - and the messages that were were supposed to be printed and saved... Don't know if that helps a whit, but there it is. Missy - Original Message - From: Norris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: OT: public schools, gov e-mail I'm wondering if anyone here who has experience with public school systems or other government bodies would grant an off-the-record opinion. Are e-mail messages either received from the public, sent to the public or sent internally a matter of public record? ... and yes, I realize each state/locality might have somewhat different laws. Here's the deal: The Madison (WI) School Board a few weeks ago voted to restrict saying the Pledge of Allegiance and singing the words to the National Anthem in order to comply with a state law... they did wise up and reverse the decision a week later. http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/oct01/pledge14101301a.asp?format=prin t http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/oct01/pledgea101501.asp?format=print The district received approximately 22,000 e-mails regarding the issue. A citizen made a public records request for those e-mails and was told a week later a majority of the messages had been deleted. http://wisconsinstatejournal.com/local/7043.html I know the district uses a POP3 system (probably Sendmail), so there is no message store or transaction log to recover them from. I imagine 22,000 text messages in a .pst would fit on a Zip disk, it could become unwieldy to manage the inbox if they were not moved into another folder. So, does anyone have an opinion about this incident in regards to the open records laws? Does Sendmail have logging that could maintain a copy of every message that routes through the system? What options are there for Exchange systems to continually maintain all messages? Can Exmerge be scripted to run a scheduled task to remove or copy old messages? How many days max can Exchange maintain deleted items (assuming unlimited drive space)? Norris Carden www.rasquel.com This account is a spam hole used for lists. Mail to it may not be read for days or weeks at a time. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange clustering
I'm waiting eagerly for publication :-) -Original Message- From: Amit Zinman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 09:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange clustering Ooh, I like horror books. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange clustering I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother? Ed Crowley Compaq Computer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange clustering Hi all, New to the group however I've been watching for some time. This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers. Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book? I've searched high and low on various search engines but just get sites full of mumbo-jumbo that is not relevant. Regards, Joe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
In my experience, I just leave my house exchange server on for long enough and that'll make it go splat :-) -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 10:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Another good one is to let your IS and/or logfile space run out very rapidly from a mail loop (use blat or the reskit simulation tools for the loop). See if you really can get that server back up and running with some extra disks within your SLA period the mail loop cleared up before it goes down again! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 October 2001 18:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] You could also use a hex editor to fsk up some bits and bytes on the IS. Take some big chunks out -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Listserver, Exchange MSER:EX Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] If you mess around with Disk Caching setting for your array controller and fake a power failure, or turn on NT disk compression on your database drive, you should see the dreaded -1018 error on your next backup. Steve Smith MCSE Information Technology Services Division Ministry of Management Services Province of British Columbia email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (250) 387-8698 -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Hmmm ... Had not run across that yet. And here I thought I'd been checking out all the resources from the list. :-( Cool stuff in there and in the directory above it: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/ It maybe in there [only took a quick peek], but what I want to do is find ways to realistically break a lab machine that would mimic real-life problems that require the use of the tools in the whitepages and techniques. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] go find the disaster recovery whitepapers. http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.a sp http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Krecovery.a sp Keep them close to your heart at all times. The methods there are like the Ten Commandments. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Never laugh at anyone's dreams. People who don't have dreams don't have much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup] Thanks to everyone and MSKB[1], I now have backups that I KNOW are good. Next step now, is to learn how to fix Exchange. I know there are a few million ways to break Exchange, but what would be the best for learning the repair tools in a lab environment? The hardware stuff 'should' be straight-forward. Break it - ID it - Repair/ Replace/ Restore - Reboot. The software and DB corruption would need to be more careful to avoid getting into a 'Restore is only option' situation. Any Ideas? Thanks John [1] Q146306 - Exchange Server Backup Restore Procedures Q179308 - How To Verify Exchange Online Backups Q152313 - Using the AT Backup Command with Microsoft Exchange -Original Message- From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NTBackup Our bat file reads: ntbackup backup z:\exchsrvr\tracking.log DS \\curly IS \\curly /b /hc:on /t Normal /l C:\winnt\backup.log ntbackup eject z:\exchsrvr is because we are a clustered enviroment, hence Larry, Moe, Curly, Curly being the virtual node, Larry and Moe are the actual nodes. Our only problem has been lately is that our store has exceeded tape capacity, and we have to click on OK the next morning to finish up the backup on the next tape. sorry, no haiku. Peter Seitz Operating Systems Analyst Cubic Corporation San Diego, Ca. 92021 (858) 505-2724 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NTBackup Iron Chef Haiku [1] Subtle textures not seen here And no steeenking rhymes ntbackup rules I should say in most cases Small vexing problem on just one server all drives don't go on one tape space not the issue when each drive is done wants new tape for the next drive command line follows ntbackup
Exchange and various things about it..
Hi all, Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-) Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the floppy drive? A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange 2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only imagine it's just looking around for something it can't find or perhaps something it would like to find. Secondly, during the weekend the server just stopped responding. Exchange was allowing me to work from two machines in the house, but when I tried to log in from one of the other 8, it failed. NT would not allow me in for a start, then when it got past that problem (Trying to find the profile on the server) Exchange wanted verification of my user/pass/domain. It refused to let me in even then. A couple of reboots and all was well, but it caused some concern. Does this happen to anyone else? Thanks in advance, Joe! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Nah as in just mail from everywhere. Must have been something going on that everyone in the world was invited to, but I wasn't :-( -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Yeah, we call that the weekend. -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday. :-( -Original Message- From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Test Really sorry to do this guys, but I can't tell if this list is just 'not happening' or if Internet mail is 'dead' somewhere (a change was made on the weekend!) Dave == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Bit like what most of Sir Bonfield's speeches are like then.. -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Heard about the Jedi thing two months ago. On the radio whilst I was fiddling with my Exchange server. So now it's sort-of relevant to the topic. Take it to a 1-2-1 email session kidz. :-( -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 October 2001 00:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen I read it in the Independentwhich reported that Jedi Knight was given a filing number. Are you calling the beloved national canon a liar? E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: 29 October 2001 08:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen smart@ss There are even some people here that can check out rumours before repeating them to thousands of people on a mailing list. /sm@rtass http://www.snopes.com/religion/jedi.htm Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for being a smart arse :) Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this listmake the connection. E. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: 29 October 2001 08:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions +44 (0)1392 459155 -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT - Luke save the Queen Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their 'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are only 34 and a bit weeks to Glastonbury 2002 - yeee E. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
