RE: Passing UserID and Password to OWA

2002-04-30 Thread Andrew Thompson
I'm expecting that that's bad for security reasons to begin with... OWA uses NT authentication as well (by default, anyway) so, wouldn't that still be a tripup? (unless you disabled it, which I think would be bad) -Original Message- From: Tim Kerrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: How to move mbx's between orgs

2002-04-30 Thread Andrew Thompson
ExMerge... does that get out grapejam stains? -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to move mbx's between orgs ExMerge -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Canceling a 'Delayed Delivery' message

2002-04-30 Thread Andrew Thompson
Is it not in the users outbox still? (or did they delete it already?) A test message to an offsite pop box dated for tomorrow is just living in my outbox waiting for tomorrow(i guess). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002

RE: Busted

2002-04-30 Thread Andrew Thompson
They have a global remove request on their site. http://www.sparklist.com/resources/remove/ -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Busted I couldn't find a way to unsubscribe

RE: Forward Rule Problem

2002-04-30 Thread Andrew Thompson
have you tried changing the forwarding address to another offsite email account, and recreating the rule scenario? (The address could be wrong, or being mangled/dropped by the mobile phone carrier) Wouldn't he get a no-relaying error back in his inbox? -Original Message- From: Tom

RE: Min Bandwidth requirements for E5.5 Clients

2002-04-22 Thread Andrew Thompson
Do you have a preferred tool for monitoring bandwidth usage? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Min Bandwidth requirements for E5.5 Clients My rule