RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

That would be Hemmoroid. -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 12 December 2003 3:55 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Ok Mr. I help build this community, Here's my opinion... You're like a hemorrhoid and no

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

A CJ, yes... Perhaps the great old one could come forth and pass final judgement on this trifling matter. Then we could all move on... -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 12 December 2003 4:47 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re:

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

I can confirm from experience that the higher client does not work. I had to downgrade the client to get it to interact with the migration wizard (E2K3 version in my case). -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 10:03 a.m. To:

RE: W2K3 and E2K3 and NTBackup

Yes. W2K's will as well. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 8 August 2003 9:28 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2K3 and E2K3 and NTBackup I'm starting to plan for my 5.5/W2K to E2K3/W2K3 migration. We currently use NTBackup to

RE: Can I delay sending messages

It can if you're running with the X400 connector. Create 2 connectors between sites, one with a size restriction and the other scheduled to go at say after 5pm. That way large attachments will go via the scheduled connector... Then again, if you are a single site and no x400 connector - no.

RE: Help please

I believe it is a veiled reference to Microsoft. The $ is perhaps a subtle dig at the alleged wealth and influence this company has. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 11:33 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help please

RE: x.4oo and Firewall (checkpoint 2000)

X400 uses port 102 -Original Message- From: uppiliv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 26 October 2001 2:00 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: x.4oo and Firewall (checkpoint 2000) I have two sites running exchange server. The network is as follows MS Exchange

RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?

I have a customer (7 sites 5.5SP4) whose IS on one server has just nudged 60Gb. -Original Message- From: Sanborn, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2001 12:40 p.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS? We're running

NDR/Relaying behaviour

Hi all I'm hoping someone can clarify something for me. 5.5 SP3 box. When clamping down on relaying I get relaying prohibited messages when spoofing a fake recipient domain via telnet - as expected no problem. However, if I send to a non existent recipient at the correct domain (say

RE: third party client can't send email to external address!?

If it works internally, check relay settings. -Original Message- From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 6 September 2001 7:57 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: third party client can't send email to external address!? Hi, We have an Exchange 5.5 and Microsoft

RE: Mailbox move rates

3-4Gb per hour. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2001 9:11 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mailbox move rates Assuming relatively contemporary target system hardware and relatively aged source system hardware, and a