Re: RE: Problem with accessing a PF
They might be temporarily loosing the network connection which would cause them no longer to be correctly authenticated. OWA probably has a solid connection to that server. But re-logging to the NT domain should fix that. Are the users that experience this problem in the same network segment? Is this particular PF on a different server then the rest of PF's they can access? Just throwing in a bone :=) Jerzy From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/23 Thu PM 01:12:11 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF Anyone have any other suggestions for this problem? Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF Nope. No replication of PFs and no affinity. Also no age limits set. Thanks for the reply. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with accessing a PF 1) Do you replicate the PF content to other 55 servers? 2) Do you have affinity with other 55 Sites? -Original Message- From: Parrnelli GS11 Ben T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 01:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with accessing a PF NT 4 SP6a SRP Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have what started as one, but is now up to four users who will lose access to some of our public folders at seemingly random intervals. This has happened to the original user about three times in the last month to six weeks. The user has reviewer permission to the folder through a distribution list, and will still be listed in the DL, but cannot see the contents of the folder. Also, he does not get the error message about not having permission, just, Unable to display the folder. He can, however, read the subfolders he has permission to that are underneath this folder. (and to which he has the exact same rights!) The only temporary fix we had found was to remove the user from the DL, wait for replication to complete, then re-add his account to the DL, but lately that hasn't been working either. Also, giving him reviewer rights by name to the folder does not work. To throw one last curve in, the users can access these folders through OWA. So far, this has happened to three users on the same folder, and a fourth user on a different folder. Any solutions, suggestions or WAGs would be most appreciated. Thanks. Ben Parrnelli Network Administrator Comm Data Directorate MAGTF Training Command Twentynine Palms, CA 92278 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA login problem
Are you specifying domain name when logging it? as in domain\login From: Kumar Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/23 Thu PM 01:51:12 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OWA login problem Hi Gurus I have a problem with my OWA login. The environment is Exchange 5.5 (2 servers, 1 site) and we have OWA running on 1 server. Recently we added another exchange server to be purely the SMTP and OWA server. This server runs on windows 2000, IIS 5 and it is a member server. I have chosen Anonymous and Basic authentication. \ When I try this from office, it works fine. When we try from outside, I am able to the initial logon box, then I get the Exchange logon page. After entering the mailbox name it comes out with another login box. Here when we type the password it again pops with the same box. After 3 attempts you get a blank page. In my office, the same screens appear and it authenticates to the inbox. I am desperate to get a solution for this. Thanks Kumar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: OT Upgrade question
You should look into the difference in cost for upgrade to e2k versus purchase of a new license for e2k. Eventually you will have to upgrade as MS will stop supporting E5.5 The deadline for buying an e2k upgrade is 07/31/2002. After that you'll be paying the full price. Talk to your MS contact to find out the difference in upgrade versus whole thing. That alone might be all that you need in your argument. Jerzy From: John Matteson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/22 Wed AM 11:22:55 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question Unless you're a government office that still relies on 3com 3Server3 as your network server. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question If its not broke it won't break Or, in the words of the financial investment community: Past performance is no guarantee of future performance Its going to break. Relying on out of date and unsupported products is like playing career bingo. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Chuck Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question If its not broke you don't need support so who cares if support is available? Eventually the increased functionality may be of value to the higher ups, after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a bonus. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 E5.5 are closer to becoming non-supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any way. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
Re: Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email
Use an internal domain that is not internet routable(for example PREMUSAinternal.com) and use e-mail addresses for this domain to achieve your goal From: Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/17 Fri PM 01:51:46 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Restrict an exchange 2000 user from internet email How would you restrict a user from receiving internet mail on an Exchange 2000 server? In Exchange 5.5 I just deleted the SMTP address to stop the receiving ability, but as you know this isn't possible in 2000. Thank you in advance for any help. Jer _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Virus Attack ??
Must have :=( And it's not even Friday. Gary, relax, it's ok, go for a smoke or something. Lay off the coffee :=) Jerzy From: Clark, John A (FUSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/16 Thu AM 10:15:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Did someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning??? YIKES!! -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? Clue 1: Exchange Admin program. HELP menu, Help topic, Index option, type tracking and look at all the pretty little entries that come on up. Clue 2: Go on a course Clue 3: Hire someone competent to administer your Exchange system. Clue 4: Read the fscking FAQ. I'm thinking Appendix D. -Original Message- From: Jorge Cardenas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? I'm new working with exchange. How I can track the message? I enabled the track message flag on exchange. Thanks, Jorge Cardenas. -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus Attack ?? track the message. We have gotten one of these, and it came from the outside. The text was a message undeliverable, which comes from system attendant not the postmaster. When you track it, you will see who it really has come from. Then tell the sender they have the Klez and now would be a good time to get some A/V software and keep it up to date. Jeff -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Attack ?? Hi Recently my exchange server (email=postmaster@domain) keep on auto generate mail to the user inside the address book. I have scanned ! I have tried everything ! But it still happening ! PLS HELP Fioon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K upgrade question
Not sure what we are missing so I thought I would ask the group. Test environment: Exchange 5.5 sp4 E2K SP2 2 way trust We used E2K ADC to populate AD. The W2K users created cannot access the mailboxes in E5.5 When we move the mailboxes to E2K the NT users can access the maibox on the E2K server but the W2K users still cannot. What could be wrong? Humbly requesting imput. Jerzy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Telnet troubleshooting
Give us info: Source IP Destination IP So we can cross check it From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 02:43:50 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Telnet troubleshooting In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail server (they're running Merak Mail). Their mail server answers, but when I try to send an HELO, with each character I hit I get a 502 5.5.1 command unrecognized -- after about 8 tries I get a disconnect and a too many bad attempts error message, but it looks like that response is coming from the outside address of my router. This works with other domains, so I'm wondering why this happens and if it's really my router complaining or not. David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Telnet troubleshooting
I can connect fine to both servers from my sendmail gateway. I've seen something like what you describe when going through a badly configured firewall. Jerzy From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 04:40:59 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Telnet troubleshooting My domain is privateconsulting.com at 208.187.29.85. Target domain is geostarcorp.com at 141.209.244.5. When I check both sites on www.checkdns.org, both mail servers appear to be operating normally. The original issue I was checking was that geostarcorp is claiming privateconsulting.com's mail server was rejecting some of their messages. David -Original Message- From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Telnet troubleshooting Give us info: Source IP Destination IP So we can cross check it From: David Florea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/13 Mon PM 02:43:50 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Telnet troubleshooting In trying to troubleshoot an SMTP issue, I'm telnetting to an outside mail server (they're running Merak Mail). Their mail server answers, but when I try to send an HELO, with each character I hit I get a 502 5.5.1 command unrecognized -- after about 8 tries I get a disconnect and a too many bad attempts error message, but it looks like that response is coming from the outside address of my router. This works with other domains, so I'm wondering why this happens and if it's really my router complaining or not. David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Friday afternoon fun
873 - but my chopper was sputtering smoke all the way - busted... Jerzy From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 10:28:28 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Friday afternoon fun
Got a super easy course. 1861. Chopper still smoking... From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/10 Fri AM 11:55:09 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun My hand is sweating and is starting to hurt -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 646 here - Just call me ROOKIE! -- From: Tener, Richard Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1493 I gotta stop playing this thing -Original Message- From: Bill Kuhn - MCSE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 1176 so far.. -Original Message- From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:46 AM To: ExchangeList@swynk Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 576 ... more practise needed ! -Original Message- From: Jeremy Pinquist [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun 950 HA ha!!! the simple games are always the most addictive. jeremy -Original Message- From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun Dang my best is 656 I better keep trying. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun I got a distance of 798 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Friday afternoon fun http://www.andylau.com/fulltimekiller/game/shoot.html -Original Message- From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Friday afternoon fun Sorry but this is very addictive http://www.seethru.co.uk/zine/south_coast/helicopter_game.htm Yours, Julian Stone _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Coolchain LtdCoolchain Ltd London Road Henley Road Teynham Paddock Wood Kent Kent ME9 9PR TN12 6DN Tel: 01795 523200Tel: 01892 831400 Fax: 01795 523241Fax: 01892 831451 All business is conducted in accordance with the company's terms and conditions, a copy of which is available on request. For the avoidance of doubt, all orders initiated by ourselves must be signed by an authorised signatory of this company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
Re: RE: DL usage
or, add yourself to them and see if you get any mail...notify the owner that you're doing this From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 02:12:27 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DL usage I guess you could export them to a csv file and then remove them. Wait for the scream? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL usage What do you think is the best way to go about finding out if a DL is used anymore. We have a bunch of them and I am not going to email the owner. Any ideas? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Exchange Migration woes...
I think he was just asking you if you experience the issue he was describing. Basicaly if you can see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM . .. I think..but I wasn't following the thread. From: M2web [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 03:16:21 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... Do you have a problem? It seems each time I post something you come up with a wise a.se comment! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Is that the case? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized
Re: RE: Delegate access for a remote user
If all you want is a look like http://www.topfun.co.uk/gonmadmail/ From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/09 Thu PM 03:50:32 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Delegate access for a remote user What does his email administrator say? -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delegate access for a remote user Hey, I need to give one user the ability to send email and have it look like it is coming from another users account (like delegate access), however the user whose mailbox that the email has to look like it's coming from is a non-local user and I do not have access to his Outlook is there a way that I can do this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP 550 Error
Sounds like they're blocking you. Try connecting via telnet on port25 to see what gives. Jerzy From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/06 Mon AM 10:58:22 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SMTP 550 Error I am getting this error sending to one domain: The original message was received at Thu, 2 May 2002 13:05:49 -0400 (EDT) from mail.ourdomain.com [216.xxx.xxx.xxx] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reason: 550 Access denied) The definition I find for SMTP 550 is that the user is unknown or the account does not exist. However, if I send from hotmail or yahoo as a test, the mail gets to the user no problems. Access denied does not sound like an error with locating the user name/account by their recieving server. it sounds more like they are not accepting incoming mail from us for some reason. I do not see our domain blacklisted in ORBS or anything similair using Sam Spade to check their databases. Beaten paths are for beaten men. Eric A. Johnston (1842 - 1914) US journalist, short-story writer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re Personal Mail Archiving
would this help? http://www.wickett.net/WNMailKeeper/ From: Mustafa Ibrahim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/03 Fri AM 11:15:36 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re Personal Mail Archiving Hi all, Guys, I got a lot of technical/knowledgebase type messages I have compiled over the last couple of years I wana archive these and have them accessible on self-contained CD-ROM. So, when I require access to these messages, I can just use the CD without the need for outlook personal folder configurations, etc. Is there some sort of self executable app or utility that will allow me to do this on a cd? or is there another way. Thanks very much. Mustafa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ximian Exchange 2000
Why not use OWA? From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 03:07:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ximian Exchange 2000 Hoping I don't get flamed for this, but here goes. I've got a shop with numerous Linux users, but we also use exchange. I'm tired of the IMAP mess and want to enable them to participate in the calendaring, etc. that exchange provides. My question is, has anyone tried the GNOME (Ximian) Evolution software with exchange 2000 connector? If so, what are some of the bugs/pitfalls that you've experienced? I don't want to waste a lot of time if it's not ready for prime time yet. Cheers, Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Haiku Friday
Lovely, I was wondering what was the delay, Expected someone to start around lunch :=) From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/03 Fri PM 04:04:47 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Haiku Friday Friday blues, once more... Nice day, no concentration Need to go home early. To be young again... Thoughts of summer vacation running through your head. Hanging out with friends... Fishing down on the river, Barefoot in the grass. If you could combine lazy days of summer youth with older wisdom... Oh yeah! I know how! Some call it retirement. Wish I had more money. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: Cerification question
My point is that having a cert can't hurt you. It might help you put your foot in a door that could be closed otherwise. Now, Why the door could be closed is another issue altogether, and I agree with you there. I am looking at it from the employee perspective. Jerzy Setmajer From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/02 Thu AM 10:54:52 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: Cerification question But that analogy doesnt quite fit. You are required by law to have a license in order to drive. Companies who require certifications as a minimal standard for hiring are only cutting themselves off from many talented professionals. -Original Message- From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RE: Cerification question I do not understand what is all the fuss about. I would like to point out that nobody here said that having a cert could hurt you. That means that it will be either ignored or it will help you. NO? Meaningless paper? Perhaps, but so is your driver's license. Does not mean you are a good driver, but you can't rent a car without it. Jerzy Setmajer From: King, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/02 Thu AM 10:41:39 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cerification question I have been conducting all my interviews wrong..!!! -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question This may sound odd but there is one golden question that will tell you exactly if the candidate will fit the group or not: What are your three favorite movies? If the person likes similar movies as the general team and sounds smart, than he/she is a good buy. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I deal with (new and different) people daily who have worked with Exchange for years but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are the hired Exchange expert for their company. The fact is that people are people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced people or vice versa. I think that the best bet is the person who realizes that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question Very good points. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience. Most hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but... then certs. Additionally while experience is the best there are people that have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any other capabilities of the hardware/software. They are nearly as bad as the paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way they did it at their last job. At least the Paper boyz know they are limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the drama the experience guy does. They piss me off so much more, that and they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way but that it is just the best way. Experience is NOT always the best qualifier either _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Re: RE: slight OT - SMTP Policy
I agree, Make a list of technical limitations based on your environment (hardware) and send it to legal/HR so they can convert it to something only they will understand :=) Items you want to have some sort of limits on: Mailbox Max Size Internal Message max Size External Message max Size Retention Time Extensions blocked. What you also could include is: Outline to a Public Folder Usage Policy (with limits and aging criteria) Distribution List Naming rules (so you don't wind up creating 5 different DL's for the same group of people) Or none of the above :=) From: Louis Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/05/01 Wed AM 05:35:28 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: slight OT - SMTP Policy Email policies are best left to your HR and legal department. Generally, you should only be involved when it comes to putting the policy in place. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions - Original Message - From: Mark Peoples [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:29 PM Subject: slight OT - SMTP Policy Hi, I am looking at implmenting a new e-mail policy for my organisation. Is anyone out there who has a company policy for e-mail (exchange specific or SMTP is OK) already written and are willing to share it with me? Basically, rather than re-inventing the wheel, I am looking for a policy that someone out there already has, to use as a basis for our own. If anyone can assist, please feel free to contact me direct: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, MP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: permissions for public folders
This only looks so simple Read the warning on the bottom of this q article. it says WARNING: When you click to select the Propagate these properties to all subfolders check box, and then click Apply, any existing permissions in the subfolders are lost. He has thousands of Public Folders, this means that current user permissions will be lost on all of them and will be replaced with whatever permissions he propagates. Not a pretty picture. Jerzy From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/24 Wed AM 11:01:44 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: permissions for public folders See Q244042. Neil -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 24 April 2002 15:55 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: permissions for public folders Subject: permissions for public folders Scenario: I am using Exchange 5.5 I have thousands of public folders. I was just asked to change all of the public folder permissions as follows. Default must be changed to none Anonymous must be changed to none Question: Is there a way I can do this from a top level and have it automatically filter down through the folders, or do I actually have to go to each and every folder and change the permissions? Thank you, Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Mailflow chart
Sound, must have sound From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/23 Tue PM 12:57:18 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Mailflow chart Could you include a 3D visual simulation as well? Nicely shaped envelopes flying through gateways and such. Please make all MTAs various shades of blue. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailflow chart And I'd like to present it at this afternoon's meeting if that's not too much trouble. -Original Message- From: Atkinson, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mailflow chart Do everything. The whole program flow. In 3D. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 April 2002 17:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailflow chart Possibly I could do one up right quick. Local, intrasite or extrasite? What kind of site connectors? - Original Message - From: Smith, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:17 AM Subject: RE: Mailflow chart Does anyone have a chart that shows the minutia of mail flow steps in Exchange 5.5? Thanks!!! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar cleansing
Yes to both questions From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/18 Thu AM 10:52:01 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Calendar cleansing Is there any way to wipe your calendar clean using Outlook 98? Or better yet, create a second non populated calendar? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000
Recommend reading description of what NATIVE MODE means From: John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/17 Wed PM 04:26:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange 2000. I have name resolution for both WINS and DNS and even got so desperate as to put entries in the LMHOSTS and HOSTS files! Win2k Machines connect no problem. I am in native mode. Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000
My bad, I take it back and apologize for my arrogant and stupid comment. VERY SORRY From: James Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/18 Thu PM 12:02:56 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 Hope you're not trying to imply that an NT 4.0 client can't be part of a native mode domain . . . Pardon me if I misread your comment. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 Recommend reading description of what NATIVE MODE means From: John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/17 Wed PM 04:26:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange 2000. I have name resolution for both WINS and DNS and even got so desperate as to put entries in the LMHOSTS and HOSTS files! Win2k Machines connect no problem. I am in native mode. Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backing up custom recipients?
Was the consistency adjuster run after the restore to alternate server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Phantom email
Assuming the email was going to the Internet - did you check your IMS queues? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Host Unreachable
Did you try putting an actual e-mail through the telnet to that server? If not - telnet to the remote server on port 25 You should get a 220 - server ready Type in: helo yourdomain.com Server will reply with a 250 ok Type in: mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You will get another 250 Type in: rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You should get another 250 Type in: DATA and press enter (it will tell you how to terminate the input - usually a period on a line of its own) Type in the test message body - whatever you feel like - and terminate the input as directed (again - probably a period on a line of it's own) You should get another 250 or some other confirmation response. If you get any errors along the way, perhaps it will give you a clue on what the problem might be. I could not find it on the Microsoft Web, but in TechNet - if you search for MS Exchange Internet Protocols - you will find a troubleshooting guide that explains all this and more Jerzy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backing up custom recipients?
You are correct - the message is confusing. The Subject refers to CR's but the body to Hidden Receipients (which could be mailboxes ). But if it's just the CR's then restoring IS will not get them back. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How Organizational Forms Work?
Well, first - do not give disgruntled employees permission to post Organizational forms. Second, password protect all the forms before you post. Keep the password list safe so you can unlock the form. Usually, the developers want to password protect their own forms - don't let them. You need to be in control. The password protection on forms is not the greatest, but it keeps most of the home grown wanna be's at bay. And if you happen to run into a REAL hacker and he has access to your network, Outlook forms will be the least of your problems. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How Organizational Forms Work?
From my experience, if Outlook forms are put together by a responsible person with basic knowledge of vbscripting, the forms can simplify a lot of tasks and be used in variety of productive ways. I do not believe they have a high impact on processing other than being usually larger than regular mail. You can replicate Organizational Forms folder across multiple servers to improve performance, just remember that any updates will not be instantaneous for everyone. DO NOT allow your form developer to have access to post forms by him/herself. Always test the form before posting. If you have different clients throughout your organization - for example Outlook97/98/2000 - test the form on all versions. Also based on past experience, hide the forms instead of DELETING them and keep it hidden for at least 3 months. Nothing worse than finding out that they still need it an having to restore just to get it back because no one seems to have a copy of it. Good luck Jerzy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WAN replication of Exchange Dbase
Does anyone know of a solution that would allow for store replication accross WAN? I have 2 data centers in different states and need to create a no delay failover in case of a disaster where basicaly the secondary location takes over 'on the fly' or at least withing few minutes if primary location fails. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
