I was intending on using IPSec for traffic from the front-end server
back to the LAN. This is how we run the MIS server currently. Keeps
open ports to a minimum.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message
) is included in Ex2003, so we
don't need MIS2002 anymore.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Something from GFI?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2003 16:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations
Set HKLM\software\microsoft\exchange\exchange provider\rpc_binding_order
To
ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc,ncacn_spx,ncacn_np,netbios,ncacn_vns_spp
In actual fact, yours will have 'ncalrpc' listed first. Move it along a bit.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;163576
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis
Sent: 23 September 2003 14:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slooww
Although when back in the office, plugged into the LAN, would you not want to use RPC?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 September 2003 14
RPC Binding order in the registry?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 September 2003 13:27
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slooww
Probably a stupid question.
Do I need an Exchange CAL for all mailboxes including shared boxes such
as 'meeting room 1' 'IT Support' etc?
Thanks
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons
.
What are these attempted connections for?
Thanks
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
157.124.218.229
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 14:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet Header Question
Hello Group
explain that.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
-Original Message-
From: Jose Manzano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2003 14:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internet Header Question
Hello Rob
mdbvu32 and removed all traces of any rules, but he still gets
the error.
Anything else I should be doing?
Thanks
Regards,
Rob Ellis
IT Manager
Samsara Group plc
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
MCP BEng(hons)
_
List posting
A removing delegation, (which relies on user A doing as
we tell him), or me logging into mailbox of User A and doing it myself,
is there any way around this?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7979
Mob 07974 111867
Are the users using 'suggest names when completing to, cc, bcc fields'?
I've seen it suggest and fill in names with addresses like this before.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Cobb [mailto:[EMAIL
Our problem has been resolved by a colleague.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q249104
explains it, although initially we were just getting the 5.0.0 errors,
we got a few mentioning DNS.
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
for it to use EHLO,
so I would lose the ability to send out as ESMTP??
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis
Sent: 26 September 2002 15:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: win2k sp2 smtp server error 5.0.0
Using a Win2K
Updated -
I think I might have found the problem:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q240832
but if I set it to use HELO, I don't get the option for it to use EHLO,
so I would lose the ability to send out as ESMTP??
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023
it be that the IP that our server sits on has been blacklisted by
certain ISPs?
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Same here, but for the last week or so.
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hotmail problems?
Yes, we have a few outbound messages waiting
the directory security tab for the VD, it tells me
that 'the path does not exist or is not a directory'
The VD shows as a normal icon in ISM, not a red X like you sometimes
see.
Help?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
_
List posting FAQ
Or maybe use IPSec?
Rob Ellis
-Original Message-
From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 13:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
S
80 TCP (HTTP)
389 TCP/UDP (LDAP)
88 TCP/UDP (Kerberos)
53 TCP/UDP (DNS)
135 TCP
of the lost mail?
It happens to random users at random intervals.
I want to get rid of the connector, and use smtp for all mail traffic,
but until we move to our new infrastructure, I'm stuck with the SBS box
from hell.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Basically, we are comparing:
an internal server with port 25 open to the internet
and
an internal server with port 443 open to the internet
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL
25.
If you had to choose one of the 2 above scenarios, which would it be?
Regards,
Rob Ellis
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 June 2002 18:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Niether is a bad theory with the proper security
No, not remote users, server smtp traffic.
We are proposing citrix full desktop, OWA for some remote users, no
POP/smtp access for end users.
The Webshield I mentioned is as you say, part of TVD.
Our design sounds very much like your setup.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
-Original Message
Sorry, to clarify, the SMTP traffic would be internet mail traffic
to/from the exchange server only.
The clients will be connecting either using OWA, or with Outlook from a
citrix full desktop.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original
I've got enterprise for the mailbox server, but I'm not sure whether
they will buy another one just to sit there as a front end
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06
Technical account manager.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 14:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What is a TAM?
It's a type of brimlesss hat
15mins. The provider says there is no problem with the POP3 box,
and I have deleted and recreated the box at least once.
Any thoughts?
(I thought pop could only permit a single concurrent connection??)
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867
30 matches
Mail list logo
