Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let you create that. William - Original Message - From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters Group, we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox method. I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything that I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site name. We have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, mailboxes, dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is worried about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on the web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. Any help would be appreciated. thanks Josh Douglas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
You can have the alias a different name. But I was able to rename a distribution group with a + sign and can email it internally. So, it is possible. Just not proper form. William - Original Message - From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters we just put a plus in our dl's so that they are up at the top of the list. I guess you would recommend changing that to something else. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 invalid characters A + has no business in an SMTP address. Exchange 200x should not even let you create that. William - Original Message - From: Douglas, Josh D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:48 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 invalid characters Group, we are about to migrate to Exchange 2000 using the move mailbox method. I'm a little confused on the invalid characters situation. Everything that I've researched says that it is just at the organization and site name. We have a consultant that says it is everywhere, account names, mailboxes, dl's. We did have an at our organization level and my boss is worried about the + sign in our dl's. I have not been able to find anything on the web that mentions anything other than organization and site name. Any help would be appreciated. thanks Josh Douglas _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
As you've read... No, I can't count. 16,000 users on a 7-node cluster, which is really a 5-node cluster. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? only 16,000 users? on an 8-node cluster? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
And I don't wear make up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You're confusing me with Andi... Oh, wait - wrong list. Never mind :) -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 08:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? you two kiss and make up now. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 1:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You are totally right. Cochran's slides do say that. My notes do not. I am wrong. I'm sorry, Gary. 7-node cluster per the slides. 4-1-2. Not 5-1-2. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
You would use an SMTP Transport Event Sink Here are a couple of articles to point you to: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=317680 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;317327 Head to MSDN and check out the SMTP transport event sink stuff and go to the Exchange section and get the last SDK. http://snurl.com/1o88 The next SDK is due out any day now, and it may have a better example for you to follow, but still the March one is pretty good. The third party applications are not overly priced. www.exclaimer.com www.disclaimit.com Www.gfi.com That last one has a trial version of their full product, after which, I believe, the disclaimer component is free and continues to function. Almost like a reward for giving them a try. Or finally, deploy a corporate signature for everyone to use in Outlook. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes Anyone know how to make a generic signature go out from Exchange for every mailbox? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Change Password in Outlook doesn't work across a trust
Versions? Is the trusted domain with Exchange a resource domain with no users? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Change Password in Outlook doesn't work across a trust I have users logging into Outlook to Exchange that is in a different domain. The change password feature does not work. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PF creation script in e2k
Sure. MSDN has samples of how to do that in the language of your choice: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/_ex ch2k_creating_folders.asp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Presley, Steven Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF creation script in e2k I am looking for a way to script pf creation in a native win2k\e2k environment. I was hoping that I could use pfadmin to create public folders, but it does not seem to be able to do it. Could anyone point me in the right direction on how to script pf creation in e2k (examples, links, etc..)? Thanks! Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails
I think there is a component of 'knowing your audience'. There may be companies or situations where such a deployment might work or be worth it. I don't think it fits the average business though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Bartley Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails A major automotive manufacturer did this for a bit, required in the company pronounced sig. It was very silly and amateurish, made employees very embarrassed to send email. The logo was about 200x200 and they used fonts at about 16 pt. I guess they saw the light, I don't see it in their sigs anymore, just normal text now. Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wilson, Fenton Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails And an electric email commanded taser to shock some sense into him/her Fenton -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I'll suggest that! Maybe something self-executing with a company theme song. Announce your presence with authority! :) -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Inserting Logo on Internet emails Heck, why stop there. Include a handy PowerPoint presentation with every email! - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Inserting Logo on Internet emails I've been seeing a lot of activity in this area lately. A friend from another firm has been tasked with creating stationery that looks like their company letterhead. That'll be fun when they have to e-mail somebody who's mail client doesn't support HTML. It'll probably make them popular with people on dial-up links and who pay for their bandwidth and connect time, too. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Not Open Relay, but...
Oh well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Winzenz Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... boggle You tested someone else's domain at abuse.net without permission? You do realize that if it would have failed other tests, they get put on RBL's? Not a move I would have made. Yikes. - Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:19 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Not Open Relay, but... Subject: RE: Not Open Relay, but... I tested it using abuse.net's relay test. It looks like your good for not being an open relay. So my opinion is that you just have a spammer who's trying to mine for address in your company. From what I understand, there's a new program going around the spammer world, that bruteforce guesses e-mail address and collects the NDR's from that domain to determine what's legit and what isn't. My advise would be for you to trace back the IP address he's using and put it in your host.deny file. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. -Original Message- From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering... is it worth it? Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server. We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the benefit. If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the database corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too. I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising clustering because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
Definitely Active/Passive.
The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to
tape after.
This is per a TechEd presentation.
William
- Original Message -
From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the
server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where
you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service
packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much
time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or
bouncing email.
On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and
the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one
quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange
2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However,
Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to
failover to.
You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a
heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we
attributed to the SAN.
2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
But do consider revisiting this with 2003.
With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now.
Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
That's pretty much the argument against clustering.
In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand
holding
in a cluster.
-Original Message-
From: MSX dude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clustering... is it worth it?
Upper management here is inquiring about clustering our exchange server.
We already have our PRIV, PUB and DIR on a SAN. I don't see the
benefit.
If the server itself fails, I can rebuild it in an hour. If the
database
corrupts it would have taken the cluster down too.
I have searched the internet but all I find are vendors praising
clustering
because they want to see you something. Does anyone have any links or
whitepapers are unbiased in their opinions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.+--xm ,)r( \y'i)l+-rrW{jxVmyzrvi
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
The PPT would be wrong then as 4+1+2 8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? Definitely Active/Passive. The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to tape after. This is per a TechEd presentation. William - Original Message - From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or bouncing email. On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to. You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN. 2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
You are totally right. Cochran's slides do say that. My notes do not. I am wrong. I'm sorry, Gary. 7-node cluster per the slides. 4-1-2. Not 5-1-2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? OK, I'll try it another way - the presentation that I heard at Tech-Ed, matched up against my notes, indicated that it was: A) 4 x 4-way servers, active, plus B) 1 x 4-way server, passive, plus C) 2 x 2-way servers, passive, for backups, etc. Equals 7. I never claimed 8. I'm perfectly capable of basic math. 8, to my recollection, notes, and thoughts of the PPT, is wrong., -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 12:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The PPT would be wrong then as 4+1+2 8 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? Definitely Active/Passive. The 8-node cluster I mentioned it 5-1 with 2 for snap back up to stream to tape after. This is per a TechEd presentation. William - Original Message - From: Schneider, Bryan D [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 6:13 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? You have the benefit of quick recovery in event of hardware failure on the server (not likely typically). But, it is really nice for maintenance where you have to apply patches, security updates, virus engine updates, service packs, etc... You can failover in a matter of seconds and you have as much time as you need to work on the server without interrupting users or bouncing email. On an active/active cluster we host 16,000 users, 2500 using Outlook and the rest using OWA 2000. We can have both virtual machines running on one quad-Xeon 700Mhz without users noticing much of a slowdown at all. Exchange 2003 with Windows 2003 runs more efficiently so far in our tests. However, Microsoft is now recommending ACTIVE / PASSIVE so you have a fresh server to failover to. You already have a key component - SAN - so I would cluster in a heartbeat. We haven't had any issues - except for a corrupted db which we attributed to the SAN. 2003 promisses to make clustering better, but we haven't tested that yet. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 6/27/2003 7:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it? But do consider revisiting this with 2003. With Microsoft running 16,000 users on an 8-node cluster now. Windows2003 and Exchange2003 of course. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it? That's pretty much the argument against clustering. In fact, many folks will tell you that Exchange needs much more hand holding in a cluster. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitor Email content
I used to live just up the street from April Hunter. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:23 PM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I once flew on the same plane as Michael Tucker. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content Of course you do. You live in LA after all. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HELP EseUtil still going.
Let it ride. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 5:34 PM Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I didn't have enough on the Exchange server so I used the /t option and put the temp file on a server with 18GB free. It took 5.5 hours to get to 100% and its been there for 2 hours. I see the file there and its 200mb smaller than the original so.? Jim -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: HELP EseUtil still going. I wouldn't recommend it. It takes as long as it takes. Do you have enough of disk space? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HELP EseUtil still going. Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 20:22:07 -0400 My exchange 5.5 server went down with a full 16 GB priv.edb today. I started a defrag at noon EST and it went to 100% complete at around 5:30 PM but it still says 100% and the disk drive is still very active and the prompt hasn't returned. Is this normal. About how long should a 16 GB defrag take on a P3 1Ghz server. Is it normal to stay at 100% so long or should I kill the process. Thanks for any quick responses cuz I'm stuck sitting here not sure if the process is hung. Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HELP EseUtil still going.
Patience is one of the tools I would include in the Exchange Administrator's toolkit. More so with Exchange200x. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:10 PM Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. ITS DONE! HORRAY AND IT WORKS. I guess good things come to those who wait. LOL Thanks to everyone who responded so quickly. Jim -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I once ran eseutil that took so long (How long did it take Johnny Carson) Till my neighbor with grew a beard. From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 20:47:46 -0400 Well, eseutil needs something like 110% of the existing database size of free space, so you just have enough room it seems. Let it do its thing! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP EseUtil still going. I didn't have enough on the Exchange server so I used the /t option and put the temp file on a server with 18GB free. It took 5.5 hours to get to 100% and its been there for 2 hours. I see the file there and its 200mb smaller than the original so.? Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5 on a WIN2000 Server
Of course it's possible. Build the server and do a restore to it. But do you want to work that hard? Why the same name? Let's look at that. Consider using a different name, but join the same site, org. Then move the mailboxes at your leisure... perhaps via terminal services session from the edge of your pool at home www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm William - Original Message - From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:30 PM Subject: 5.5 on a WIN2000 Server Currently running Exchange 5.5 on a Win NT 4.0 Server. Have just purchased a new Hardware platform for it. Compaq DL380 G3. Want to build the new server running WIN2000, but still want to remain using Exchange 5.5. I know 5.5 will run on 2000 but my dilema is that I want to build the new box exactly the same as the old one. As in same Server Name, same org, site name etc...Is this going to be possible? Also will need to get all the current data from the old server onto the new server. Can anyone help out or point me in the direction for some online documentation? Thanks for your help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Brick level backups
I probably should reread this, but this was my answer to this question A year ago - plus an added point. Why not to do Brick Level Backups: 1) They take a lng time. At my last position, the priv.edb on several Exchange servers was huge with several mailboxes exceeding 2GB. Backup windows of 'July' is not acceptible nor necessary. 2) Brick Level break SIS in the process. At a previous employer we had an SIS ratio of 4 (lots of little daily cash spreadsheets and the like getting sent to DL's). This means that a BLB backup uses as much as 4 times the total tape. Now I need an autoloader to take care of the boxes of tapes required each night. 3) You can't perform a full server restore to point of failure with brick level backups. You have to actually perform additional full online backups as well to allow for full disaster recovery. More tapes. More time. More money. 4) A restore of several mailboxes from BLB's will cause the store to grow because of no SIS. If my SIS ratio is 2 and some disaster leaves me with only brick-level, my restore will double the size of the priv. 5) The redundant backups for brick level lower the overall performance of your exchange server as backups compete with users for CPU cycles and disk reads. It is also additional and unnecessary wear and tear on tape drives. 6) Brick Level Backups do not backup items in deleted item retention. As my users (for email anyway) have always been of the educated variety, they know and use deleted item recovery as needed. 7) A restore of a mailbox is seldom needed. (Probably the only instance is inadvertant deletion by an administrator in Exchange5.5) With deleted item retention set to a reasonable 30 days or so, and with deleted mailboxes retained in Exchange2000, brick level backups fall in the category of a waste of time and resources. 8) Backups should not be a helpdesk support option. They are a disaster recovery requirement. With all that tape and time, the convenience of having someone restore my mailbox is so simple I can be more careless with my email. I can always get my info restored. The Potential for user complacency because we can always restore uses Valuable IT time and resources. 9) Yes, it's true. For me, I have only done this using ArcServeIT. Because of comments here in this and other forums, CA took the Exchange agent back to the lab and did some more fixing on it. For me it was too little too late. Basically, BLB's are not perfect. Data is not perfectly recreated through the restore process. Problems included header info missing, digitally signed emails corrupt, attachments missing. 10) Many, many more reputable and experienced people have shared their horror stories over and over in this and other forums and newsgroups. So much so that I was relieved to learn in 1998 that it wasn't just me that felt this way. The people that have expressed this opinion I hold in high regard and certainly owe it to myself to try to understand why the concensus is for or against something. 11) Microsoft provides the utility ExMerge which can be used to backup a single mailbox to .pst if necessary. I use this as the last step before deleting a users mailbox after (s)he have left the company. It is a simplified, granular alternative for certain circumstances. 12) Exchange2003 allows for a disaster recovery storage group to allow Production restores without a recovery server. The above may not all apply to you. Would you like to see the list against the use of 'confidentiality disclaimers'? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lloyd Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi guys, I just wanted to know why are brick level backups a bad idea. I know why pst files are. I can only imagine is that they take forever to complete, and not always all of them. Sorry if this has been discussed before but i do need some reasoning for my bosses. I know Ed hate em Thnks David CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE This communication contains useless information which is confidential and may also be naughty. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail or by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then delete the e-mail and any copies of it. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IIS log Files with wrong date??
Greenwich Mean Time? - Original Message - From: Matt Plahtinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:33 AM Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MS Purchase
I'm recycling Scharffisms in celebration of his MVPness. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Missy Koslosky Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions 2000? hmmm... - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:59 PM Subject: Re: MS Purchase Exchange 2000 RTM. - Original Message - From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: RE: MS Purchase Ex2K3 sp1 ;) themolk. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: MS Purchase totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SpamBelt
Spam-by-proxy is still spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Importance: High Forwarded to the list at Stu's request: -Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:26 AM To: Erik Sojka; Exchange Discussions Cc: Mailing company CC addresses deleted Importance: High Eric, You are ABSOLUTELY right, and I'm asking David to send an apology to the same list with an explanation. Up to now they have not answered my insistent requests. I'm getting very unhappy with their non-communication, and if this goes on, we will have to resort to other means. Thanks for the feedback, Stu -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Stu Sjouwerman Subject: RE: SpamBelt Thanks for the response, Stu. I'd like to add something. There are some other staff at my company who got the same message I refer to below (mentioning the IHS product, and requesting them to stop by at the MecEd conference). These people did *not* attend MecEd and should *not* have been on a list of people who were registered to do so. Yet they got this spam. Why is that? As to the response from David Cragg: If it smells like a duck then it is a duck. How would any right minded email administrator be expected to react to a message with a throwaway address as a reply-to? This tactic of using several domains in the headers, from/reply-to addresses, etc. is the exact same tactic that a chickenboner spammer uses. Why use them? Stu, your company's credibility as a whitehat supplier of anti-spam products is seriously on the line. From a spam recipient's or victim's perspective, what is the difference between your product and the way in which the ad was delivered vs. any of the chickenboners who are also spamming for an antispam solution? -Original Message- From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Stu Sjouwerman Hi Guys, We admit that this looked like spam a lot. I actually called the people who sent it for us and complained. The company who own this database and emailed it for us are MSD2D, they have worked for years for Microsoft building their trade show list and catalogs. That's why you are on their list. Here is included the answer from their Pres, who explained why it looks like this. - In response to your email today I admit that it has the appearance of Spam. We apologize for that. We usually send these type of announcements with our reply address but it was a last minute mailer and we had already use our regular mail box for our weekly Security newsletter. It was important that we get that notice out to people who we thought might be attending Tech-Ed as Sunbelt was accidentally left out of a proper position in the Microsoft Exchange Directory. David Cragg President - Understandably you assumed it was spam, with a juno address as the sender. Turns out this -is- what they use for their returns. An unfortunate choice to say the least. Hope this clarifies the situation. Warm regards, Stu _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EDB Size ?
2 weeks is a long time. I prefer to release my vowels daily. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 4:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Make sure Mr. Sojka sends a cashier's check, not a personal check. The personal check would require being held for 2 weeks prior to releasing the vowel into his posession. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EDB Size ? Yes. Send me a check for $250. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EDB Size ? Can I buy a vowel? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest
Thank you Andy. Sometimes with the numbers, I have to read it twice to make sure of what an email says 2000 on 2003 in 2003? 2003 on 2000 in 2000? etc, but the supported installation matrix in that document says it all. That reference should be the answer to all these questions about which Exchange server version goes on which platform in which AD version. You rock. William - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:15 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest Yes. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/TiWin2003.doc - Original Message - From: Elmerick, Ralph H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest Can the Exchange 2003 be running on a server running Windows 2003 in a Windows 2000 forest. Ralph H. Elmerick NT/Exchange Administrator 330-471-3409 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest Yes as long as all of your DCs and GCs are SP3 as well. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest
Well, that's way above average. Good for you. ;o) I like the reference to years in the product name. I think. Perhaps in 2005 I will still have Windows2000 running MOM2004, monitoring Sharepoint2001 and Exchange2003, which I access using Outlook2002. - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:17 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest Mine only goes to 11. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions There are so many 2003's out there now, it makes your head spin! - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 in a 2000 Server forest Thank you Andy. Sometimes with the numbers, I have to read it twice to make sure of what an email says 2000 on 2003 in 2003? 2003 on 2000 in 2000? etc, but the supported installation matrix in that document says it all. That reference should be the answer to all these questions about which Exchange server version goes on which platform in which AD version. You rock. William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 11
They skip 13. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Etie Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions That's one long outlook. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 11 One and the same. Outlook10 = Outlook2002. Outlook9=Outlook2000 Outlook12=Outlook2006 - Original Message - From: Pham, Tuan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:15 AM Subject: Outlook 11 Sorry I have to ask, what is Outlook 11? Is that outlook 2003? Thnx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Another MS move
They may want the talent, not the product. - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:50 PM Subject: OT: Another MS move totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS Purchase
Exchange 2000 RTM. - Original Message - From: Steve Molkentin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: RE: MS Purchase Ex2K3 sp1 ;) themolk. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June 2003 8:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: MS Purchase totally unrelated but MS just bought RAV anti virus . . . Any predicitions on how long until we see MS AV client/server or MS AV for Exchange? :) This mailbox protected from junk email by Matador from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: **NOT SPAM (ME)** Re: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55
What are the odds? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Best practices recommend otherwise: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/ad/windows2000/plan/bpaddsgn.asp As a best practice use DNS names registered with an Internet authority in the Active Directory namespace. Only registered names are guaranteed to be globally unique. If another organization later registers the same DNS domain name, or if your organization merges with, acquires, or is acquired by other company that uses the same DNS names then the two infrastructures can never interact with one another. - Original Message - From: David McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:19 AM Subject: ** SPAM (5.50/5.00) ** RE: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 They won't authenicate through the real domain name servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 What prevents them from doing that with any real domain name? - Original Message - From: David McSpadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:10 AM Subject: ** SPAM (6.00/5.00) ** RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 It looks good on paper to avoid someone stealing your email domain and spoofing your address. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 I don't see the point of a .loc domain myself. I think MS was recommending that in the early days, but generally, most recommendations now are to use a real domain name for your internal network. -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 It is not the email address that I want change. Our current addressing is [EMAIL PROTECTED]. What I am looking to change is the SMTP header that Exchange is writing. It is now writing this based upon the internal DNS information on the Exchange Server. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Change FQDN in Ex55 Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on outgoing mail. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
Exchange2003 RC1 has proven to be more stable at Microsoft that Exchange2000 sp3 From a session at TechEd. All but 1 server at Microsoft have been migrated to Exchange2003. That's almost 80,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions I agree, especially with the Road Warriors comment. Unfortunately, we don't have any road warriors for the City, as we allow OWA to be used, and the connection speed for that is just fine for everyone; or so they say. I will probably wait to upgrade to Exchange 2003 for at least a year, let everyone else work out the bugs :) Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 15:52 To: Exchange Discussions Good morning, Surely you are laughing by now. But my management team wants to know why I want to spend all of this money for Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003. I mean we are currently on Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5. How do I justify the expense and get it in the budget for 2004. Help!!! What would these do that your current system doesn't do (easy enough to figure out) that you will need / want to do in future (not so easy)? How important is continued support from Microsoft to you? Do you have a lot of road warriors or people on remote sites with relatively slow links? Are you running Windows 2000 or 2003 active directory? If so then it makes good sense not to have to maintain 2 user directories and upgrading to a newer version of exchange would enable this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003
It's the recovery storage group I like. And Volume Shadow Copy Service. Granted I don't need an 8-node cluster OWA is just fluff. - Original Message - From: Bob Sadler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:25 AM Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 Yes, that may be true. But my E2K server is very stable itself, and the benefits of upgrading don't seem much to someone who doesn't need the ability to download your mailbox to your desktop. Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA WAN/Internet Specialist 913-339-6700 x194 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Why would I want to go to Exchange 2003/Outlook 2003 Exchange2003 RC1 has proven to be more stable at Microsoft that Exchange2000 sp3 From a session at TechEd. All but 1 server at Microsoft have been migrated to Exchange2003. That's almost 80,000 mailboxes. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sadler Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook 11
One and the same. Outlook10 = Outlook2002. Outlook9=Outlook2000 Outlook12=Outlook2006 - Original Message - From: Pham, Tuan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 11:15 AM Subject: Outlook 11 Sorry I have to ask, what is Outlook 11? Is that outlook 2003? Thnx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: EDB Size ?
U R the I in IT. - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: Re: EDB Size ? I'll give you the I from Insurance guy. ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 8:56 PM Subject: RE: EDB Size ? Can I buy a vowel? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
Ya, it felt great. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:21 AM Subject: RE: TechEd Any news on the release yet? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [TX] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm asleep at the back of several of the Exchange specific presentations. Except for the one Andy Webb did. - Original Message - From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: TechEd Who else is here? stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Indeed. I have dozens of Exchange books. Literally. If I compare, say, Barry Gerber's Mastering Exchange 5.5 (Sybex) with Paul Robichaux's book, I get more info in fewer pages in Paul's and the text is readable. Maybe it's an author-reader compatability thing. I find the style suitable. No offense intended to Mr Gerber, but Plus, when I go to the index with a search term in mind, it is THERE. In some other books, I struggle to locate that which I seek. William - Original Message - From: Paul Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:36 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a bible IMHO. It's published by O'Reilly. regards Paul -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 June 2003 17:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin.
Approaching 110,000,000 exchange seats out there That's a lot of people not in their right minds. Me, I'm left-handed, so I'm an exception. William - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Nobody in their right minds would take an Exchange server or be a Exchange Admin.I too inherited the $#%^ thing and depend on help from people with more experience. So please, no crappy commentsjust help if you can. Thanks. Newbie too! -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. You took a job as an Exchange Admin and don't know how to build a basic DR environment? stemy -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Subject: Recovery Help. Request made from a new Exchange Admin. Hello All: Second day on the job as the new Exchange Admin and I need help! My employer has a two yr old backup tape of Exchange data. The Co. was using Arc-Serve 6.5. We are now using Veritas but found a version of Arc-Serve and believe we have recovered the data. Now, I need to place the data onto an Exchange Server so I can XMerge the necessary mailboxes into .pst files. Is there a way I can move the priv.edb and pub.edb files to my bridgehead or other mail servers and XMerge the needed data that is being requested for legal reasons nonetheless? Or, do I need to build a new Exchange Server? Any detailed information is much appreciated. Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
and of course http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Indeed. I have dozens of Exchange books. Literally. If I compare, say, Barry Gerber's Mastering Exchange 5.5 (Sybex) with Paul Robichaux's book, I get more info in fewer pages in Paul's and the text is readable. Maybe it's an author-reader compatability thing. I find the style suitable. No offense intended to Mr Gerber, but Plus, when I go to the index with a search term in mind, it is THERE. In some other books, I struggle to locate that which I seek. William - Original Message - From: Paul Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:36 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Managing Exchange Server by Paul Robichaux would be my choice, bit of a bible IMHO. It's published by O'Reilly. regards Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5?
Thank you, Mr Active Directory MVP. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:57 AM Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Actually, with the exception of this week, in which most of us (myself excluded) are at Tech-MEC, this is the largest collection of MVP's helping Exchange users around. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Try the MS Newsgroup usually an MVP or MS will response to your questions within in 24 hours period. As for reading try the MS web site. -Original Message- From: labigdawrg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Suggested reading for Exchange 5.5? Hello All: I am familiar with Exchange but now that I have been given all responsibilities pertaining to Exchange I am looking for good reading material. Any suggested material? Thank you. LABD _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
It works absolutely fine at 7:00am. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there? John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it -Original Message- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Message filtering
I would say with a third party application. - Original Message - From: Diop [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:27 AM Subject: Message filtering I´m runnning Exchange 5.5 How to prevent all uusers in specific domain from delivering message to my site BUT allow only 2 users from that domain. Thank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
Did you see this one?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q323733
It's really not an exchange error. It's way more likely a networking error
or Windows error.
An MtaBindBack over RPC has failed
The receiving MTA can not authenticate (bind) the sending MTA
Can you bump up diagnostics on it?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . .
I have found 3 or 4 Q articles with the exact event id messages, but the
resoution doesnt apply.
They either say Exchange 2000 or one said DNS is in error, which it is not,
etc.
Where are you?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;257679 ?
Where are you by the way?
- Original Message -
From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: TechEd
Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed?
all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no
changes on either box. One here and one in the UK.
both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail.
both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue
articles I can find dont apply.
All are in DNS
Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i
have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone.
any ideas?
VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :(
TIA
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: RE: TechEd
No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance
gains
with properly implemented MS technologies...
Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet
caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can
TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever
implemented the network here to please CJ
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
Ahhh.. Atmospherics? You working on Wireless there?
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At:
Wednesday,
June 04, 2003 12:59 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
No idea... It wasn't there when I typed it
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:55 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: RE: TechEd
What's all the garbage at the end of your post?
Looks like the teletype when the crypto looses synch.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted
At: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:11 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: TechEd
Subject: TechEd
Who else is here?
stemy
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.ryirr
.+--xm ,)r( \y'
i)l+-r rW{jx5m^zx%
S ^jZ 2 G(L\xfyb) )
.+x )ryi)+rrW{j
. ryi rrr ZZvh+-i2G(
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin
Re: TechEd
These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: TechEd No, it's wired, but definitely not a shining example of performance gains with properly implemented MS technologies... Takes about 2 minutes to log onto these boxes here at TechEd's internet caf. Sometimes, I can connect to IM... Sometimes not Sometimes I can TS to my box at home... Sometimes not... We need to to sacrifice whoever implemented the network here to please CJ -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:38 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: RE: TechEd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
What's a HOSTS file? ;o) - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:44 PM Subject: RE: TechEd But IF the HOSTS file has been modified, then ping could work and 5.5 routing could fail. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:37 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd These are in the same site. They can ping each other (was that by FQDN?) and have RPC communication confirmed. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: TechEd I just left that room... Slam packed and my feet were falling asleep. Had to get up and move around I'll be coming back down in a min for the next session... I'll be the one wearing the grey PSS Superior Kung Fu shirt... Yeah, DNS is first suspect. If its 5.5 then I'd put a HOSTS file in place on each one (to be certain to eliminate DNS, which is not 5.5's first method of name resolution). What are the exact error codes within the events? stemy -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:42 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: TechEd Subject: Re: TechEd Anyone care to lend help to a frustrated admin here at tech ed? all of a sudden 2 of my exchange boxes stopped talking to each other; no changes on either box. One here and one in the UK. both MTA queues are filling up and not transferring mail. both event logs have numerous event id 9318 and 9322 but all the queue articles I can find dont apply. All are in DNS Both can ping and rping each other consistently . . . .map drives, etc. i have rebooted one in Uk since they are gone. any ideas? VERY frustrating and all the experts I can ask are gone! :( TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help for a Newbe
And do not represent a method of server recovery, so it is a duplicate process. I never back up mailboxes individually. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm - Original Message - From: Carmila Fresco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:06 PM Subject: RE: Help for a Newbe Brick level backups take forever though especially of you have big stores. -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions If you didn't use the option to back up the mailboxes individually, your way is the only way to restore one mailboxI've been there before myself. I now back up the mailboxes individually. Todd -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re:Help for a Newbe Using Veritas Backup Exec V8.5. Full nightly backup of the Information Store and System State. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help for a Newbe Just one mailbox. That seems like a little overkill. How are you doing your backups? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help for a Newbe I'm REALLY! new to exchange. I inherited a exchange server about a week ago. I need to restore a mail box. (Have not done before but have done some reading) I'll tell you guys how I plan on doing it and would you be so kind to tell me if I have left anything out. 1. build second exchange sever with same server name and same version and patch level. (Does it need to belong to the same domain or does it even need to be on a domain at all?) 2. Copy the priv1.edb and priv1.stm from tape to the restore server. 3. Mount database store and use the eseutil tool to create the pst for the mailbox. 4. import pst file into account needing restored. Are these 4 steps all I need or are there additional steps? Thanks for any input. Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help for a Newbe
3. Mount database store and use the eseutil tool to create the pst Eseutil does not create .pst files. When you get your backup restored to your recovery server (which you ought to keep around to test restores regularly), you can extract a mailbox with 'ExMerge' to .pst. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help for a Newbe I'm REALLY! new to exchange. I inherited a exchange server about a week ago. I need to restore a mail box. (Have not done before but have done some reading) I'll tell you guys how I plan on doing it and would you be so kind to tell me if I have left anything out. 1. build second exchange sever with same server name and same version and patch level. (Does it need to belong to the same domain or does it even need to be on a domain at all?) 2. Copy the priv1.edb and priv1.stm from tape to the restore server. 3. Mount database store and use the eseutil tool to create the pst for the mailbox. 4. import pst file into account needing restored. Are these 4 steps all I need or are there additional steps? Thanks for any input. Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is Anybody using IM on Exchange 2000? I can't get it to work....
Is it configured to use a firewall in the global settings? Exchange 2000 Exchange System Manager Global Settings Right-click Instant Messaging Settings, and then open the properties Click the Firewall Topology tab Unselect the option, This network is protected by a firewall Using NAT or a proxy? XCCC: Unable to Receive Instant Messages After Logging On Through a Proxy Server or by Using NAT http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;281610 - Original Message - From: Todd Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: RE: Is Anybody using IM on Exchange 2000? I can't get it to work There is no personal firewall, I will try to flush the DNS on both machines, and the correct IM version is on both. I also noticed that if I sign on I can see who is on but it doesn't update their status unless I signoff and on again. Weird. Todd -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Is Anybody using IM on Exchange 2000? I can't get it to work Personal Firewall? Flush DNS on either pc? Correct IM version on either pc? (exchange version is different) -Original Message- From: Todd Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:28 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Is Anybody using IM on Exchange 2000? I can't get it to work Subject: Is Anybody using IM on Exchange 2000? I can't get it to work I have installed the IM as the tech net articles describe. I have added a (A) host file for the server, I added the _rvp service in DNS. The virtual server appears to set up correctly. I can see the other person i enabled with IM but cannot send messages. I keep getting message could not be delivered. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Todd _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TechEd
I'm asleep at the back of several of the Exchange specific presentations. Except for the one Andy Webb did. - Original Message - From: Mynhier, Stephen - contractor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 1:10 PM Subject: TechEd Who else is here? stemy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Exchange2000] FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Undergrou nd MEC ED List Event
No, he's quite heavy. - Original Message - From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] FW: TechEd Attendees - Invitation to Undergrou nd MEC ED List Event Miller Light ? ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High Security for Exchange
If you can't trust your admin, get one you can trust. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:28 PM Subject: High Security for Exchange Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even the admin couldn't see their e-mails. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High Security for Exchange
Or are you looking for an email encryption solution? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:55 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange If you can't trust your admin, get one you can trust. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:28 PM Subject: High Security for Exchange Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even the admin couldn't see their e-mails. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High Security for Exchange
Oh well. They shouldn't put anything in an email they wouldn't want the whole world to read anyway. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:15 PM Subject: RE: High Security for Exchange I am the admin. They don't trust ANYbody. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange If you can't trust your admin, get one you can trust. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:28 PM Subject: High Security for Exchange Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even the admin couldn't see their e-mails. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High Security for Exchange
All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a number of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at KMS. Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a solution like PGP. Finally, engage MCS's government consulting unit (or similar unit from $one_of_a_few_consulting _shops) to discuss the implementations used for DMS. On 4/3/03 16:28, Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even the admin couldn't see their e-mails. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High Security for Exchange
Particularly? No. Are you requiring inbound email to be encrypted as well? I can also capture keystrokes of remote computers of unsuspecting users among other lame methods. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange A decentralized PGP implementation (a generally bad idea... and imperfect at best ) doesn't particularly does it? On 4/3/03 18:36, William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a number of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at KMS. Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a solution like PGP. Finally, engage MCS's government consulting unit (or similar unit from $one_of_a_few_consulting _shops) to discuss the implementations used for DMS. On 4/3/03 16:28, Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even the admin couldn't see their e-mails. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: High Security for Exchange
Woohoo! High-5! Yo're looking great today, by the way. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange You are preaching to the choir William. Data which requires the highest levels of security should be administered by admins who have the requisite clearance levels and who are kept in cages during their off hours. On 4/3/03 18:57, William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Particularly? No. Are you requiring inbound email to be encrypted as well? I can also capture keystrokes of remote computers of unsuspecting users among other lame methods. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange A decentralized PGP implementation (a generally bad idea... and imperfect at best ) doesn't particularly does it? On 4/3/03 18:36, William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All these solutions still require an element of trust in an administrator. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: Re: High Security for Exchange Start with the NSA whitepapers and other best practices for securing Exchange. www.neuronactive.com has links to the NSA whitepapers and a number of other good security resources. Look at Paul Robichaux's book and at KMS. Then spend some significant time researching the pros and cons of a solution like PGP. Finally, engage MCS's government consulting unit (or similar unit from $one_of_a_few_consulting _shops) to discuss the implementations used for DMS. On 4/3/03 16:28, Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone familiar with measures and procedures or software add-ons for high security internal situations? Our certain department would love it if even the admin couldn't see their e-mails. Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service terminated with service-specific error 1276.
And you should include your name so people know who the heck they are talking to. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Public Folder: Exchange Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions You need to include part of the message you are replying to so that people know what the heck you are talking about. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:35 PM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service terminated with service-specific error 1276. Subject: Re: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service terminated with service-specific error 1276. ya you are right. unfortunately, the thing is they didn't stop the AV service but copied the priv and pub out from the box and replaced with new one. hence it complicate the whole thing. not sure why after repair of the 2 files it still prompt me the above error. very strange, after running 'isinteg -patch' and it returns successfully done, but still unable to start this serivce. any clue ? thankx. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NT Backup is stopped by the information store
Application/System event log say anything? - Original Message - From: Benjamin, Bernie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:38 PM Subject: NT Backup is stopped by the information store Exchange 5.5 Sp3 on NT 4 Sp 5 Exchange server backups using NT Backup was working until a few day ago. Now the information store backup starts then terminates 10 minutes into the backup. The event log messages is MS ExchangeIS (253) The database engine has stopped the backup procedure with a red error flag . When the backup was working it took about 120 minutes and on completion the event message was the same with a blue information message. There does not appear to be any problems with tapes or tape drive because the MS directory store backup appears to be working correctly. Can anyone suggest why the backup stops and a fix to get the backup working. Thanks, Bernie Benjamin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Impromptu Poll
Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Point taken. I should have added, assuming a consistent per user frequency of access and access behaviour. Larger databases still use more hardware in a way... starting with more hard disk surface area. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are On what do you base this assertion? I maintain that corruption is more due to faulty hardware and frequency of access than size of the database. That is, a huge database that is never used has a low probability of corruption. Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Impromptu Poll Does a bigger house take more energy and effort to clean? If you eat at the buffet are you more likely to get backed up and more difficult to restore versus a French restaurant? The chances of corruption exist regardless of database size, but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are. But you also need to consider the backup and restore windows, and quality of hardware. There is someone on this list with a 16GB mailbox. That in itself if corrupted! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Impromptu Poll
Yes, that is mostly true. :o) - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll Even so, the root cause is usually faulty hardware, not the size of the database per se. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Impromptu Poll Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Point taken. I should have added, assuming a consistent per user frequency of access and access behaviour. Larger databases still use more hardware in a way... starting with more hard disk surface area. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are On what do you base this assertion? I maintain that corruption is more due to faulty hardware and frequency of access than size of the database. That is, a huge database that is never used has a low probability of corruption. Just because a database is huge doesn't necessarily mean that it is more heavily used. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Impromptu Poll
Does a bigger house take more energy and effort to clean? If you eat at the buffet are you more likely to get backed up and more difficult to restore versus a French restaurant? The chances of corruption exist regardless of database size, but certainly the larger you allow the database to grow, the greater those chances are. But you also need to consider the backup and restore windows, and quality of hardware. There is someone on this list with a 16GB mailbox. That in itself if corrupted! - Original Message - From: Joshua R. Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 10:17 AM Subject: Impromptu Poll What is the Size of your Information Store? And If it gets very large, is there a chance it can becoming corrupted? I am Very Interested in Exchange 5.5 Joshua Morgan Method IQ Senior Network Engineer Main: (864) 272-1145 Mobile: (864) 449-9912 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Spamassassin - Good?
Sure, it is good. It's imperfect like all the rest, but certainly can be a good choice for some companies. Unfortunately McAfee acquired Deersoft in January, so the Exchange integrated version is sure to be doomed to mediocrity. http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/other/jump/deersoft.asp http://www.mcafeeb2b.com/products/anti-spam-protection.asp But if you want a *nix front end then: http://news.spamassassin.org/ William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I would be grateful to hear anyones opinion on spamassassin. I am in a postion where I might be told to start using it. Thanks, Ken Jasa Messaging Manager Weber Shandwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5
I am curious Jay, why is a drive letter change discomforting? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Kulsh Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks for replying. I am planning to do a full backup as well as exporting mailboxes using ExMerge. The problem using Optimizer is that I wll lose the current drive letter -- somewhat discomfiting. Jay - Original Message - From: Leeann McCallum To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:16 PM Subject: RE: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5 I haven't had to do it, but I would probably do a full backup, shut down the server, add the additional drive, and then use Exchange Optimiser to move the databases to the new drive. Once all services back up and running, disconnect the old drive. -Original Message- From: Jay Kulsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2003 9:49 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A Simple Question - Replacing a small drive in Exch 5.5 Our drive that contains information store is near capacity. We will like to replace it with a larger drive. Will the following scenario work? 1. After shutting down the server, add the larger drive and bring back the server with all Exchange services stopped. 2. Copy the MDBData folder to the new drive. 3. Rename the new drive same as the old drive (E: in this case) in Disk Manager. 4. Start the Exchange services after running isinteg -patch. 5. If everything goes well, shutdown the server and remove the old drive and boot up. Is there any flaw in this thinking? Please comment. Thanks. - Jay _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Migration of Exchange 2003
Your question was very general and you can't expect any specific answers outside of 'grab the whitepapers and read!' As I answered elsewhere, you are in a great position to learn, plan and take charge of this future project. William - Original Message - From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:08 AM Subject: RE: Migration of Exchange 2003 Tony is such a dog.. Thanks Tony.. Please disregard any eMAILs from me in the future. I would appreciate that. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migration of Exchange 2003 D E P E N D S Y E S Y E S M A Y B E From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Migration of Exchange 2003 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:26:15 -0500 Thanks for the answers. Could you please elaborate on them? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Migration of Exchange 2003 Depends Yes Yes Maybe From: Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Migration of Exchange 2003 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:18:29 -0500 Good afternoon, We are in the midst of budgeting for the year 2004. Active Directory is a Security Team directive and if they get their piece done, we will be able to migrate to Exchange 2003. Currently we are using Outlook 98 and Exchange 5.5. We have 4500 mailboxes and will probably grow to 5000 by mid-2004 when we are looking at to convert. How intense is Active Directory from the Security Team's view-point? We are using Novell and NT 4.0. There are approximately 12000 accounts to be converted to AD. Once their piece is in place and our upgrade and migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003 starts, how long will it take us to convert these 5000 users. Are their tools out there to help with the migration? Are there things that a eMAIL Administrator has to do for AD? To we have to touch each mailbox and replace distribution lists? I know these plans are a long way down the road, but I want to be positioned to get there with great success. I would really appreciate hearing your struggles from exchange (any flavor) to active directory. Thanks for your time and efforts. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take but by the moments that take our breath away. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Renaming E2K server
I've called mine lots of names. ;o) - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 6:59 AM Subject: RE: Renaming E2K server I did just reply on the MS newsgroups on this, but I'll reply here as well. You cannot rename an Exchange server, so your options are to rebuild the server with a new name, or put in a 3rd party relay that offers the chance to say HELO using a different name. Neil -Original Message- From: Oliver Tann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 24 March 2003 12:27 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Renaming E2K server Subject: Renaming E2K server I have to rename my E2K server as it doesn't match its hostname and uses an underscore (so I can't just change the hostname). Some external mail recipients reject mail as the servername and hostnames don't match. It's also a DC so I'll have to demote it first My question is simply are there any problems in changing the name of a mailserver? Should I stop all the services first? And do I need to do anything to the AD once I've demoted it to a member server. Any help greatly appreciated. Oliver _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exmerge?
For only 3 people, you can use Outlook to esport to .pst if you're concerned. ExMerge will do this while the computer is online. The help file that comes with is very thorough. The .pst files are going to take up more room than what that content occupied in the Exchange database. William - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:34 AM Subject: Exmerge? I have to use the exmerge utility to create PST files of mailboxes for about 3 users who are leaving the firm. Their mailbox sizes are really huge (about 1GB each). I have never had the opportunity to use Exmerge, so I want to get an idea. Can this be done online or do I need to take the Exchange Server offline to do this? I know it affects the SIS, will it really increase my database size drastically? I only have 4GB of space left on a 36Gb partition where the Information store resides. Will this retain the folder tree structure for OL client. If it requires exchange downtime, I'd rather export to PST files using the Outlook client. Thanks for all your input Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stupid disclaimers
LOL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nunez, Danny Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 3:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions No, it's The Fabulous Bud-E-Luv. Check him out at: www.budeluv.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Stupid disclaimers All the ladies know me as Buddy Love. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What does this mean and how can I fix it?
The total amount of server-side rules must fall under 32k to fit in an RPC packet. Consolidate. Be selective with which rules need to run server-side (you can still add client-side rules) William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, LT Johnny -wcso Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Is there a limit to the number of rules you can have in place? Lt. Johnny Miller Management Information Division Warren County Sheriff's Office 550 Justice Dr. Lebanon, Ohio 45036 513-695-1416 Office 513-695-1286 FAX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page:www.wcsooh.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JScript
I use Lingo. - Original Message - From: The Geek Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:26 PM Subject: RE: JScript How so . . . Exchange admins that don't use scripts to automate procedures in there environment. I find that hard to believe. From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: JScript Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 14:16:58 -0500 I think you signed up for the wrong list... -Original Message- From: The Geek Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 2:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: JScript I would like a recommendation on a book for a beginner to learn JavaScript. Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WebDAV Exploit
Yes it does. William - Original Message - From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: WebDAV Exploit Hi, Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article doesn't really say. Thanks, Aaron __ This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. __ NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WebDAV Exploit
Good point. I rebooted, but it is quite likely an IIS restart would suffice. Sorry, I have nothing firmer. - Original Message - From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:30 PM Subject: RE: WebDAV Exploit I guess I should have worded that better. A reboot of the entire server or just the IIS services? Aaron -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit Yes it does. William - Original Message - From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: WebDAV Exploit Hi, Does anyone know if this reg hack in Q241520 requires a reboot? The article doesn't really say. Thanks, Aaron __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WebDAV Exploit
Your experience speaks volumes. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:43 PM Subject: Re: WebDAV Exploit Viagra can help with that. -- Original Message -- From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 16:40:10 -0800 Good point. I rebooted, but it is quite likely an IIS restart would suffice. Sorry, I have nothing firmer. - Original Message - From: Edwards, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 4:30 PM Subject: RE: WebDAV Exploit _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....
Postfix, baby! - Original Message - From: Jim Helfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. How hard is it to set up Sendmail ? I had a hard enough time figuring out Exchange! Jim H Wendel, Jesse wrote: Out in the dmz we use qmail with a loop to spamassassin, for inbound traffic to our internal Exchange organization. If the email is ranked as spam, the envelope gets rewritten and sent inbound to a quarantine mailbox which gets reviewed daily by staff. We're grabbing over 10,000 spams per week, with less than one (1) false positive per week (yes, that is over 1/10,000 or better than . of reliability!) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Codename - Greenwich
The Real Time Communication product will be an addon to Windows2003. - Original Message - From: Brian Ko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: Codename - Greenwich I think Microsoft's new IM requires Windows 2003, but can anyone verify that? I tried to look for requirements, but was not able to find it. Thanks in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ForestPrep
Yes, sir. - Original Message - From: Warren Cundy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: ForestPrep I have two domains in the same forest abc.com, def.com. I have Ex5.5 installed on abc.com, I want to install an Ex2000 test server to def.com, and eventually install a different Ex2000 server to abc.com, joined to the existing 5.5 setup. Do I have to run ForestPrep on the abc.com domain? The def.com omain doesn't have the Enterprise or Schema Admins group, and I can't seem to add users from the def.com domain to the Enterprise Admin group in abc.com. Does this make sense? I plan to run ForestPrep in abc.com, then DomainPrep in def.com. When I'm ready to install Ex2000 in abc.com, I assume I will have to run DomainPrep there again. Thanks -Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Looking for way to many manage multiple email accounts under one account...
No. (MAPI didn't change) Still a single RPC packet. - Original Message - From: Ryan Finnesey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:08 PM Subject: RE: Looking for way to many manage multiple email accounts under one account... Is the 32k limit going to change with Exchange 2003? Ryan -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Looking for way to many manage multiple email accounts under one account... Are you talking about separate aliases for mailing list management? Or do you need to send from different addresses? Assuming Exchange 2000 (you mention ADUC) you can add additional SMTP addresses to the User object in ADUC (Properties, Email Addresses tab). This will put any mail sent to the additional alias into you mailbox, where you can use rules, etc. to further process and sort. You can already use rules to manage mailing list traffic without the need to create alternate aliases, and the additional aliases won't change the 32k limit on total rule size in Exchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5
Doesn't Andy like it when you open your mouth and blow it? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:51 PM Subject: RE: admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5 OK. I was wondering the same thing but decided not to open my mouth and blow it. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions What does an Outlook Object Model Guard security prompt have to do with the admpack.exe and Exchange 5.5? .. Confused.. In any event... Tell your developers to use Redemption and be done with it. On 2/28/03 15:31, MSX dude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone put these two together? I work with some developers that are tired of seeing the will you allow dialog box and want to put a .dll in their app to get around it. In reading the docs I don't see any reference to the version of Exchange server they run it on and wanted to see if anyone had installed this and if there are any pitfalls I need to avoid. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot of prep work that would eliminate most of your questions. You don't even mention 'Active Directory Connector'. There is a lot more to know before effectively answering your question as asked. I recommend starting here: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradeguide.a sp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Could use some help, need a refresher! When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site. Are the connection for mail delivery automatically setup? I though they were. Do you have to edit the MTA or IMC connections. IMC is using DNS for delivery. There is only one MX record pointing to the 5.5 server. Do I need another directed to the E2K system. The setup is a mailfilter is passing mail from the Internet to a the 5.5 system, then I thought to the E2k box. How do I check this? The issue is I have moved one test mail box to the E2K system, and it intermintaly looses mail inbound and outbound, even when sening to users on the 5.5 system. I did check to see if the HOME server islisted correctly, it is. Thanks, - John Q _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5/2K co-existance
Well now we're getting somewhere. :o) Start with message tracking. Where is 'never-never land' exactly? Also, increasing logging might produce some ugly errors in the application event log (that might make you curse at the ADC). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions That is funny you listed that doc, those were the steps I followed. The ADC is up and running, no errors. The issue is I can get delivery receipts from the systems, when I send them mail from the ouside. But when that user replies to the message it goes to never-never land. And internal delivery, with-in the site, is fine. But when ALL users send mail to outside domains it is not listed in the queue and is never delivered. I can ping ouside and do MX lookup properly, but the message are no where to be found. That is why I think I have a real issue. From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:49:45 -0800 When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot of prep work that would eliminate most of your questions. You don't even mention 'Active Directory Connector'. There is a lot more to know before effectively answering your question as asked. I recommend starting here: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradegu ide.a sp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Could use some help, need a refresher! When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site. Are the connection for mail delivery automatically setup? I though they were. Do you have to edit the MTA or IMC connections. IMC is using DNS for delivery. There is only one MX record pointing to the 5.5 server. Do I need another directed to the E2K system. The setup is a mailfilter is passing mail from the Internet to a the 5.5 system, then I thought to the E2k box. How do I check this? The issue is I have moved one test mail box to the E2K system, and it intermintaly looses mail inbound and outbound, even when sening to users on the 5.5 system. I did check to see if the HOME server islisted correctly, it is. Thanks, - John Q _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NAV and Exchange
Frequent false positives (from items like transaction logs) and potential corruption of data. W -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Lloyd Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Can i ask u all why its not wise to run virus scans on the exchange directories? Or am completely of base here? NT4/sp6 Exchange 5.5 /sp4 Thanks David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus for exchange
Excellent. I don't eTrust them as far as I can eThrow them. Sophos and Panda are underrated, too. W -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stephens, Tara Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm sure it's a shock, but we have been running Computer Associate's Etrust Exchange option on our servers for about 2 years without issue. Tara -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus for exchange I have some complaints (mostly admin features which should be there that are not)...BUT so far it better then the previous package vie used (NAY). The management over all is nice bill -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Antivirus for exchange Well, FWIW no compaints with Scanmail in three or so years. I think most people would say trend and Sybari are the best so far as Exchange AV. Paul -Original Message- From: Mustafa E. Senyuz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 February 2003 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus for exchange [bcc] Hi, I'm trying to find a good antivirus solution for exchange. I checked out Norton AV for Exchange, McCafee and TrendMicro's antivirus for exchange. TrendMicro's seems good. Which one do you advice? Or is there any better product? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA with IIS and exch 5.5 on diff servers
That is my preferred method. With Exchange5.5, OWA connects to Exchange using MAPI. MAPI by proxy if you will. Putting the OWA server internal only requires opening port 443 for HTTP-SSL through to the OWA server. W -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jerry J. Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions What would be the preferred method in here? Putting IIS on the exchange server and running it in the private network? __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: insufficient space to store all of your rules
The 32k limit is a MAPI limitation. The server-side rules must fit in a single RPC packet. This limitation is not changing anytime soon. William - Original Message - From: Anthony Roark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:24 PM Subject: RE: insufficient space to store all of your rules Thanks Ed, Is there anyway to increase the 32kb amount? Anthony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: insufficient space to store all of your rules You are permitted 32KB to store rules. When you exceed this amount you get the error you are seeing. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services One man's Spam is another man's UCE. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatic template response
There are client-side and server-side rules. Server-side rules, though created with the client, activate on the server without the client open. http://www.slipstick.com/rules/serverbased.htm As for other options for auto replies... http://www.slipstick.com/addins/auto.htm William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions MSx55+SP4 Do you know what do I need to configure to allow an automatic reply (with a template) for each message received by one of our mailboxes. We tried outofoffice rules and rules but we got a subject like out of office with the first one and the rules only work if the client is open. Rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Web Access for Exchange 5.5
Hmm... 'screen shots of a gal' gets by spam filters -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Rotman Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Try messageware for the Plus Pack 5.5 http://www.messageware.net here are some screen shots - check out the GAL! http://www.messageware.net/enews/pp5531j03/PlusPack55NewsFlash.html -Original Message- From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 5:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Web Access for Exchange 5.5 Does anyone know of a plug-in for 5.5 OWA that will allow you to access the GAL? Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 bad?
Is it not a best practice to 'shut off' any network entry/access point that you aren't explicitly using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions If he already wants to shut it off why does he need any reasons? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 bad? Are they any reasons to disable POP3 for use by users on a E2K setup? Security or any other? Customer would like to shut it off but needs reasons why POP3 should be shutdown. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2003
*SCHWING* No... it is for real-time restores to the production server. To me this makes OWA improvements total fluff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scoles, Damian Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions I am poking around on a Windows .Net Server (Windows 2003 - Build 3718) with Exchange 2003 [Build 6.5.6803.4]. I am just curious to know what the function of a Recovery Storage Group. Is this specifically for testing restores of existing Storage Groups? Thanks. Damian Scoles Senior Technical Analyst MCSE+I, CCNP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup
No. If Retained Delted Items does not help, then restore the database to your recovery server and pull the needed data from there. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 4:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Importance: High One of our users mistakenly deleted his past Friday's calendar information through his PDA. We do have a backup of our Exchange server data for this past weekend. My question is there any utility in exchange which will let me restore only his calendar information from the backup? Any assistance would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Voice Mail
Kinda like Exchange2000 pre-sp1. ;o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of prontomail Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions GC!. That's THE keyword. GC. It depends heavily on ONE GC. It does NOT know how to seek and use other available GC for its lookups. It has to be hard-wired to just one. This would be fine for a one-site, small network. But, in my Multi-Site, multi-GC, Multi-network environment, this has been nothing but a PITA. That's my primary gripe. Recovery from failure is an exercise in voodooism.. Of course, your experience may vary. Deji - Original Message - From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail We are currently using Unified Messenger 4.1 in our Exchange 5.5 environment and fixing to migrate to Exchange 2000 in two weeks. This means that Unified messenger will have to utilize the GC instead of Exchange 5.5 Directory. Sounds like you are having problems with thisanything I should know? -Original Message- From: prontomail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA and Voice Mail And it's crappy . at least in my environment. Barfs really loud anytime I have to do any maintenance on my GC. Does not know HOW to look for other available GC. Really clumsy to recover from. I'll stop here. Deji - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 12:25 PM Subject: RE: OWA and Voice Mail Its called Octel Unified Messenger, and is currently sold by Avaya, who has the old Lucent (and before that ATT) PBX hardware business. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
Just like Vegas girls! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions They'll tell you anything to sell you a box. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M. Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That was the word I got at MEC. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago. Things may have changed since then. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
why would you want to spend extra money to make it more complex? By that logic, should we be using a simpler more affordable messaging solution altogether? I agree with you, though... your boss actively suggesting a cluster for Exchange is no time to be passive. ding ding. *giggle* William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Etts, Russell Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions WHAA All the guys that I have spoken to at PSS try and keep you away from a cluster. Here is what Microsoft recommends... Active Passive, and the cluster should do nothing else but Exchange (I know, everyone knows it - but it bears repeating). I have a cluster here (currently active/active but that is being changed), and I can tell you this much There are extra steps in making a FE/BE situation work (and it can be a hassle). Clusters cannot run the SRS service. The cluster will roll itself on occasion, and some people will have to close and reopen Outlook. Exchange 2K is complex enough, why would you want to spend extra money to make it more complex? Please make sure you know what you're getting yourself into. I wish I could get a hold of the guy who talked my boss into a cluster and kick him in the ding ding! Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Well the Microsoft Engineers seem to think it will work quite well. I will let you know how it works out. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN You can but shouldn't. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chinnery, Paul Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN I thought you couldn't cluster Exchange. BTW, we're running the same setup (albeit probably much smaller) and backing up using BE 8.6. We haven't run across any problems so far. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlant _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
He's so modest... what with that wicked sense of humour and charm... he's dead sexy... ... or so I'm told... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jacob Jeong Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions You are sick. Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN lol I look much better after a few beers, or with lime juice in my eyes. - Original Message - From: Jacob Jeong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN They probably hadn't seen you in person or picture What's up? Jake -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Yea, they told me I was handsome. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:49 PM Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN They'll tell you anything to sell you a box. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M. Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That was the word I got at MEC. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That's not what they told us, but this was at least 6 months ago. Things may have changed since then. -Original Message- From: Depp, Dennis M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN According to the EMC engineers, they can do a hot split. No need to stop and restart the services. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archives - Buy yours today.
95!? That's expensive! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Peter Szabo Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Sorry Chris, I have my own, starting from '95. /Peter - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:15 PM Subject: Archives - Buy yours today. I'm looking to make more money off of my www.swinc.com affiliate account so here's my blatant advertisement: The 4th Quarter 2002 SWYNK archives have been added to the archive CD. Now you too can have copies of the mailing list from 1999 - 2002. Relive all of the exciting moments when FAQ questions were asked for the _very first time_. Watch in wonder as the history of Paul plays itself out. Get your copy of this amazing archive CD with 10s of thousands of Exchange solutions lovingly prepared for your viewing pleasure. How much would you expect to pay for an amazing resource like this? $2499? No! $1999? No! The folks at Simpler-Webb have gone absolutely crazy. For a limited time, you can have this amazing CD for as low as only $10 US. But hurry, and order now because supplies are limited. That's right. For only $10 you too can have an amazing Exchange resource at your finger tips. Just think of the pride your family will feel knowing that people aren't answering your questions with FAQ!!! or RTFM. So hurry, operators are standing by to take your call. So don't delay. - Payment Details --- We will need pre-payment of $10 (US) cash or check, $11 (US) for credit card. In-state customers please add 8.25% tax. We WILL NOT reply to any posts to the mailing list on this topic. We accept Visa, MasterCard, and American Express - feel free to call at 512-322-0071 to order via credit card. The address is: Exchange List CD Simpler-Webb, Inc. 1214 W. Sixth Street, Suite 209 Austin, TX 78703 If you are overseas, please be kind enough to visit http://ircalc.usps.gov and add a reasonable airmail cost to your order. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and Voice Mail
http://snurl.com/oe8 We used to disable the button through a reg edit. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=288119 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Please excuse my ignorance on this topic but about 2 years ago I went to a Hands-on Lab for Exchange 2000 and in OWA they had this media tool that played voice messages on the web page itself. You just clicked a button to download and install. I currently have Exchange 2000 running and I cannot find anything like that in OWA.Is it something that is thirdparty or something that you download separately or am I in a bad dream and just need to wake up? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP won't renew lease
Bummer. What does the Windows forum say about it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'Exchange Discussions' Importance: High I am currently having an issue with one of the subnets on our DHCP servers and I could use your help. On one of the subnets DHCP won't renew the leasing of IP address to any of the clients. The clients who already have IP address lease to them are working normally but whichever one got rebooted could not get the new or same IP address. In the event viewer I see an event ID 1011 with the following warning The DHCP Server issued a NACK to the client (client's hardware address) for the address (IP address) request. Has anyone seen this before? This server is running NT 4.0 Server SP 6a. Thanks much in advance for any help. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server capacity
I thought the exact same thing. Spend the money on the hardware instead of the software. You might lose some features, but you might gain in the long run. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jorge Herrera Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve. -Jorge Herrera A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server http://www.e-smith.org/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server capacity I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Server capacity
Shared folders is a common feature set in other applications, too. But good deal on the software! Dear Board of Directors: Thank you for providing this new messaging and collaboration suite for our company. It seems, however, that our hardware is not up to the task of meeting the messaging needs of our staff using this application. Indeed, our peers are switching from Exchange to other products, because they perceive Exchange is too slow, based on our experiences. Can you help us out? Thanks! Erick :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions The budget for the software isn't an issue for us. Microsoft is on our board of directors, and so supplies us with software at no cost. If we had to pay for the software, it would probably be another story, but even then I would still pull for Outlook/Exchange. I think the Outlook/Exchange combination is one of the best ways to handle the type of email we deal with, which is mostly project based and so the shared folders model works great. Thanks, Erick - Original Message - From: Jorge Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:23 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity I know this may be a bad forum for this, but since your box is so outdated and you have a very limited budget, have you thought of using Linux and sendmail/qmail/postfix etc for email and squirrelmail/imp/ etc for webmail? This would allow you to use your current hardware with no expense other than your time and (maybe) a slight learning curve. -Jorge Herrera A turn-key solution that you can evaluate would be SME Server http://www.e-smith.org/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erick Thompson Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Server capacity I know it is well beyond end-of-life, but given our financial constraints, is it useable? I don't have the resources to do a proper stress test to see how response times would be under a ~30-50 user load. If it takes 45 seconds for a user to open their inbox, then I will have a good reason to say that we need something with more muscle. I haven't set up an Exchange server before, so I don't know what kind of load it puts on systems. Erick - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: RE: Server capacity Even if it was, that machine is well beyond end-of-life. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Server capacity I don't think E2k or even W2K is recommended on a Ppro system. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Server capacity I am hoping that I can get some feedback on a server configuration. I have a Compaq Proliant 6500, dual PPro 200, 256 MB ram, and 7 x 4.3GB drives in RAID 5 with a hot spare. I want to set this system up as an Exchange 2000 server for about 30 local users, and another 20 via OWA. The email load will be fairly heavy, and there will be a lot of use of shared folders and calendars. I'm concerned about taking the time to set the server up, get Exchange up and running, only to find that it's running too slowly for the users to be productive. I know more is better, but this is a non-profit with a very limited budget, so I want to make sure we have what we need. Is this server going to be a serious bottleneck? Thanks, Erick _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 upgrade
A good starting point: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradegui de.asp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phil Steele Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hi , I hope you can put me in the right direction. At present I am running Ex5.5 on a 2000 server. I am upgrading my PDC from NT to Windows 2000 and incorporating Exchange 2000 into the domain. What are the basic steps that I have to do to move mailboxes etc before decommissioning the old 5.5 server. ( I may still use this as a backup server off site). I look forward to your comments. If you could recommend a good book to cover this topic, that would be great. thanks very much Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup
XADM: Set Deleted Mail Message Retention Time in Exchange Server 5.5 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;246283 XADM: Understanding Deleted Item Retention and Message Deletion Process http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q249680 William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Sharma Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Importance: High We are running Exchange 5.5. I am not sure if deleted item retention is enabled. BTW, how do I find out whether it is on or off? Thanks! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup If you have deleted item retention on, you may be able to get it back. What Exchange version are we talking about anyhow? -Original Message- From: Sanjeev Sharma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore explicit folder data from the Exchange backup Importance: High One of our users mistakenly deleted his past Friday's calendar information through his PDA. We do have a backup of our Exchange server data for this past weekend. My question is there any utility in exchange which will let me restore only his calendar information from the backup. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on VMWare
Of course this would be only for 'tinkering'. :o) William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions It's neat... accessing Titanium on the same server with Outlook11 running in VMWare. Microsoft deploys some labs in this manner. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hey all. Has anyone tinkered with Exchange on VMWare? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on VMWare
Ew! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jason Rader Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions We're going to test it as a DR tool. The ability to set 2 identical servers, leave one powered down, and if the live one dies you start up the other virtual server. Should be interesting to see if it works. Jason From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange on VMWare Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 14:52:24 -0500 I am actually thinking about using VMWare as an additional abstraction layer. For example if my server blows up, I can restore system state and reinstall Exchange with the /disasterrecovery switch ONLY IF the hardware is exactly the same. Otherwise system state restore will end up with a BSOD. With VMWare I think I would be able to do a system state restore to any hardware because VMWAre would look the same anywhere. Am I thinking straight? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange on VMWare
Most definitely. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua R. Morgan Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Is outlook11 still in Beta? Joshua Morgan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange on VMWare The download does not include it. Be nice and put it on a FTP server for me to access :-) - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 3:52 PM Subject: RE: Exchange on VMWare _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
