Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 3:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box?
I've always configured my Exchange bridghead servers to
forward outbound mail to the SMTP gateway / Antivirus box
This is more of a design philosphy question than an issue with any
particular environment.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box
I've always configured my Exchange bridghead servers to forward outbound mail to the
SMTP gateway / Antivirus box that sits in the DMZ. Recently I talked to another
engineer that says he always configures his Exchange bridgeheads to go straight out to
the Internet, bypassing the SMTP gateway.
Clishe
Sent: 13 July 2003 19:25
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box?
I've always configured my Exchange bridghead servers to forward outbound
mail to the SMTP gateway / Antivirus box that sits in the DMZ. Recently
I talked to another engineer that says he
, July 13, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box?
I've always configured my Exchange bridghead servers to forward outbound
mail to the SMTP gateway / Antivirus box that sits in the DMZ. Recently I
talked to another engineer that says he always
, July 13, 2003 10:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outbound Mail: straight out or through A/V box?
I do it exactly the same way as you do but with a different A/V engine on
the gateway. I've never been one to trust a single AV vendor and then take
the flack if an infected email hit
6 matches
Mail list logo
