Sorry, but recovery time is all there is, along with more pedestrian issues like does
the backup fit on your tapes, and does the store fit on your disks. Exchange 5.5 deals
remarkably well with huge databases.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
Sorry
: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
or
Tec hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or
Tec hnical
5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5. Enterprise Size Limitations (Recommended or Tec
hnical)
So how can you give an argument for Size limitations on Mailboxes?
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto
6 matches
Mail list logo
