RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-07 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
But if he already wants to shut it off anyway, why does he need to be convinced to do so? :) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Is it not a best practice

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-07 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
I get it. The manager needs to have his a55 covered in case *his* higher level manager wants to chew it off when he can't use Outlook Express from home. :) -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad

Re: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Andy David
Reason: Customer would like to shut it off. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:09 AM Subject: POP3 bad? Are they any reasons to disable POP3 for use by users on a E2K setup? Security

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Robert Moir
Well its always a bad idea in general security terms to run processes when you have no need to use them; why open yourself up to the potential of an exploit in something you don't have to use when you can just close it down and forget the risk? Why risk forgetting you need to apply a patch for

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Edwards, Aaron
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Well its always a bad idea in general security terms to run processes when you have no need to use them; why open yourself up to the potential of an exploit in something you don't have

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Exchange (Swynk)
How 'bout the fact that you get domain usernames and passwords flying around in plaintext when you use POP3. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: POP3 bad? Subject:

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Edgington, Jeff
). -Original Message- From: Exchange (Swynk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? How 'bout the fact that you get domain usernames and passwords flying around in plaintext when you use POP3. -Original Message

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Ed Crowley
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? At our site it's our policy that we purge all email 30 days and older. We don't want people downloading mail to their home computers at the risk

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Charles Marriott
as in pst? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? They can do that just as well without POP. In fact, I would wager that many of your users

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Edwards, Aaron
Subject: RE: POP3 bad? as in pst? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? They can do that just as well without POP. In fact, I would wager

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Ed Crowley
]] On Behalf Of Charles Marriott Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? as in pst? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Ed Crowley
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edwards, Aaron Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? I'm sure they can. Anyone can make pst file, copy their emails to disk, or find another way. But it at least blocks that method of doing it. Aaron -Original

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Edwards, Aaron
Guess that depends how many computer literate people you have at your site now doesn't it? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Whoopee. You've blocked a method nobody

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Ed Crowley
AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Guess that depends how many computer literate people you have at your site now doesn't it? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Edwards, Aaron
The one on the top of your head? :) Just kidding. I see your point. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Not at all, which is my point. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
If he already wants to shut it off why does he need any reasons? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: POP3 bad? Are they any reasons to disable POP3 for use by users on a E2K setup?

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread William Lefkovics
Is it not a best practice to 'shut off' any network entry/access point that you aren't explicitly using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions If he

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Bingel, Chris
Justification to management? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? If he already wants to shut it off why does he need any reasons? -Original Message- From

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Matt Plahtinsky
to Exchange and security -Original Message- From: Bingel, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Justification to management? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread knighTslayer
Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Question? When a user from out side your firewall connects to exchange via POP3 and logs in. Is that username and password sent in clear text? Is there any security involved in this process? If not someone sniffing in the middle just got a username and password

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread knighTslayer
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=3847pg=4 k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of knighTslayer Sent: 05 February 2003 21:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? You are correct, the username and password

RE: POP3 bad?

2003-02-05 Thread Ed Crowley
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Plahtinsky Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: POP3 bad? Question? When a user from out side your firewall connects to exchange via POP3 and logs in. Is that username and password sent