Why not just use Blat, postie etc on the remote machines?
- Original Message -
From: Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:32 AM
Subject: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Have an interesting problem. Currently have our
A few ways I can think of:
1. On the same page where one can put in allowed IP addresses you can add
only clients that authenticate. This, however, would require any POP/IMAP
clients using these servers to have to change their settings.
2. If it is a static set of addresses that are otherwise
Have the remote monitoring machines utilize SMTP AUTH or put a basic SMTP
server on the machines doing the monitoring so they can route mail on their
own.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the
e-mail alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are on
various other networks around the country to be able to relay thru our
mail server without being an open relay.
Oversnipped so I have no idea what you are responding to.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We do not need an application on the remote machines for
sending the e-mail alerts. Looking
]] On Behalf Of Jerry J.
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the
e-mail alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are
on various other networks
My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This was to the
first response about using Blat from Andy. We have full capabilities to
send the e-mails.
I put the smpt server on the local machine out and the programmers do not
think that will be feasible due to the many variables involved
Oversnipped again, but SMTP AUTH seems to meet the desired objective of the
original query.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This
Thanks Chris, I do believe that it exactly what I am needing to do. Now I
have never touched it before so if I set this up on my exchange server and
they hard code the account and password into the software, how will that
affect internal users using Outlook? I am assuming that they will need to
Not sure how your environment is configured, but in mine it doesn't effect
internal users at all. None of my internal users use SMTP... Well, there is
the Mac guy, but his client is already configured to use SMTP AUTH with his
own NT credentials. Adding one or one hundred more user accounts
5.5
Subject: RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This
was to the first response about using Blat from Andy. We have
full capabilities to send the e-mails. I put the smpt server
on the local machine out and the programmers do
border.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the e-mail
alerts. Looking for a means
Well it looks like what I am going to do is set up distro lists for each
site and send the mail to the list then have anyone that needs to get the
alerts on the list.
Sucks for me. Alot of administration. But I plan to set up a server to
automatically do this for me in the future since all
13 matches
Mail list logo
