RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-10 Thread Robert Williams

eManager is working great for me using the mapi version...only I don't like
that the auto download can only be configured for one time a weekit
seems like trend is updating the antispam file every day now.
It is catching way more spam than I ever thought we were gettingonly
problem is I wish It coul scan non deliverable mail but when it is sent to
the postmaster, the headers are gone.any one know how to get around
this?, cause I have a handful of users who don't work here anymore and they
are spammed to death..filling my postmaster box every day..

Thank You,
Robert Williams
Senior Network Administrator
Raypak, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone - 805-278-5363



-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Not the emanager component

-Original Message-
From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Is this included in their Neatsuite ?   Similar to the gateway scanner
included in NAV CE?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a banned word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked
according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch

RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Darrin J. Carter

I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I
haven't had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can
customize it as well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 Hello all,
 
 Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block 
 SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Brian Dugas

What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked
according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Brian Dugas

What would you recommend?

I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works
great.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 Hello all,
 
 Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block
 SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Dale Geoffrey Edwards

Antigen v6.5 by Sybari.  Gold package coming out soon, which will have
additional features.

Geoff...


-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What would you recommend?

I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and it works
great.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 Hello all,
 
 Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If 
 you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

Depends entirely on your needs and budget. My placement of it was in terms
of total features offered. If the eManager product has the right features
and price for a given org, then it's certainly a valid choice.

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:56 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 What would you recommend?
 
 I am using Trend Scanmail for AV protection on the server and 
 it works great.
 
 
 Brian Dugas
 MIS Director
 Summit Technical Services, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.summit-technical.com
 Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
 Fax: 401-738-9813
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:51 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. 
 There's also no complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on 
 what you're looking for... If you want the basics, it's just 
 fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or even place it in 
 the top 10).
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
  
  
  Hello all,
  
  Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block 
 SPAM? If 
  you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Lynne July

I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a banned word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked
according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Lynne July

Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam rules which
they provide in an encrypted file, right??  I'm not sure what the point in
preventing us from seeing this.  Trend sent me an unencrypted copy of the
file (trend$rf) when I asked them; but I'm not going to ask for a new copy
every time the file is updated, and it would be convenient to verify what
they are scanning for.

Tech support did provide me with a valuable shortcut to adding items to the
Anti-Spam (header filter only).  Instead of opening the eManager interface
for each server, typing in the password 4 times, and modifying the anti-spam
filter 4 times (one on each of my 4 servers), you can edit the spamrule.txt
file on one server and copy this file to each server with a batch file.
(saves me a ton of frustration, cause I was in the habit of clicking on OK
after making a change on one server and this action abruptly exits
eManager.)

I had to turn off the content filter (which scans the entire message body)
due to the extreme performance hit this took on my primary Exchange server.


-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


There's no access to the default rules, which can be a PITA. There's also no
complex lexical analysis. Depends entirely on what you're looking for... If
you want the basics, it's just fine. I'd hesitate to call it the best (or
even place it in the top 10).

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 Hello all,
 
 Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block 
 SPAM? If you are, thoughts - positive/negative?

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Allan Johnson

eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a banned word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked
according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Scharff

Right, if it blocked messages with XXX in the message body, it might be
important to know that if you work for the Texas Chili Parlor. But without
access to those default rules o the ability to edit them, for some
organizations that means not using them (which means more time manually
building your own).

 -Original Message-
 From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:06 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this
 
 
 Oh, I forgot about that - you're talking about the anti-spam 
 rules which they provide in an encrypted file, right??  I'm 
 not sure what the point in preventing us from seeing this.  
 Trend sent me an unencrypted copy of the file (trend$rf) when 
 I asked them; but I'm not going to ask for a new copy every 
 time the file is updated, and it would be convenient to 
 verify what they are scanning for.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Trent Hancock

Is this included in their Neatsuite ?   Similar to the gateway scanner
included in NAV CE?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a banned word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked
according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives

RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this

2002-09-09 Thread Martin Blackstone

Not the emanager component

-Original Message-
From: Trent Hancock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 7:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Is this included in their Neatsuite ?   Similar to the gateway scanner
included in NAV CE?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Allan Johnson
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


eManager on a gateway server is definitely the way to go, it would only cost
you a 2000 server license and an acceptable PC (processor memory etc).  I
have mine running on a dual Pentium 200 with 512MB, leftover server.

The product works well and is relatively customizable, it catches 80-85% of
valid Spam, .1% valid emails out of 1500-2000 emails a day incoming (.1%
example whoever would of thought that Suma Cum Laude was not Spam? :oP).  I
second the PITA on not being able to change default rules and also the bug
that erased custom rules during an autoupdate (They fixed that one).

I give it 8 out of 10 against similar programs under $2000.

-Original Message-
From: Lynne July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I ran into that same problem - kind of defeats the purpose of the filter
when the subject contains the offensive language.  So we switched to the
MAPI version.  This has problems of it's own - it is not possible to
configure this product to scan incoming mail only.  Users attempt to save
contact or calandar items (which shouldn't be scanned) with a banned word
and they disappear.

A better solution (if you have the budget) is to scan on the gateway
instead.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


What version are you using?  ESE/API or  MAPI/AVAPI?.

I am demoing the ESE/API version and the SPAM that is blocked actually
appears in the users mailboxes in preview mode and then when you click to
open the message, you see the standard message The email was blocked
according to rules. and I only have the Administrator being notified,
not the sender or recipient, so I would think the recipient would not see
any notification.


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


I'm using it at two clients sites.  I think that it works great.  I haven't
had any complaints.  It blocks 99.9% of the crap!  You can customize it as
well.

-Original Message-
From: Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Trend - eManager for Scanmail - anyone using this


Hello all,

Is anyone using Trend's eManager for Scanmail to stop/block SPAM? If you
are, thoughts - positive/negative?


Thanks - Brian


Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.summit-technical.com
Phone: 401-736-8323 x11
Fax: 401-738-9813



_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp