13, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
I would bet that on that (4x) .pst file, you have a lots of messages that
refers to the same attachments. Exchange server will take care of it with
SIS, but .pst breaks that.
Andrew
MCSE (W2K NT4) + CCNA
At: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:14 AM
Posted To: ExchangeDiscussion
Conversation: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is Messages take up more
space in a PST than in an Exchange store. I seem to be
finding
]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
I would bet that on that (4x) .pst file, you have a lots of messages that
refers to the same attachments. Exchange server will take care of it with
SIS, but .pst breaks that.
Andrew
Put *that* in your[1] blb and smoke it!
[1] metaphorically speaking of course.
paul
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
Exactly
] Not per store.
[2] Yes, that's 60.
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is Messages take up more space in a PST
Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: question re pst=bad#7 from the faq
In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is Messages take up more
space in a PST
than
6 matches
Mail list logo
