RE: SpamBelt

2003-06-13 Thread Erik Sojka
*** -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SpamBelt Not quite. I'm merely pointing out the difference here ;) If Tom's talking about the same message I

FW: SpamBelt

2003-06-13 Thread Erik Sojka
: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Stu Sjouwerman Subject: RE: SpamBelt Thanks for the response, Stu. I'd like to add something. There are some other staff at my company who got the same message I refer to below

RE: SpamBelt

2003-06-13 Thread William Lefkovics
11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Stu Sjouwerman Subject: RE: SpamBelt Thanks for the response, Stu. I'd like to add something. There are some other staff at my company who got the same message I refer to below (mentioning the IHS product, and requesting them to stop by at the MecEd

RE: SpamBelt

2003-06-13 Thread Christopher Hummert
Agreed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SpamBelt Spam-by-proxy is still spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: SpamBelt

2003-06-07 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SpamBelt Not quite. I'm merely pointing out the difference here ;) If Tom's talking about the same message I got today, it was targeted to TechEd attendees, and not to any and every @$$hole who has ever

RE: SpamBelt

2003-05-31 Thread Erik Sojka
: roving.com and juno). -Original Message- From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 29-May-03 6:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: SpamBelt Not only that, but since lots of us asked

SpamBelt

2003-05-30 Thread Tom Meunier
Why would a company who sends me so much SPAM sell a product called SpamSucks!? Especially spam trying to sell me a product called SpamSucks! And sent with a throw-away account at juno.com as a reply-to address, yet sent through a spamming firm's (roving.com) servers... yeesh. How many more

RE: SpamBelt

2003-05-30 Thread Martin Blackstone
The subscribe to the following theory: Its only SPAM if someone else sends it. We send out specially targeted marketing material -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Why would a company who sends

RE: SpamBelt

2003-05-30 Thread Durkee, Peter
And in fact, if they send enough of it, their messages are guaranteed to be perfectly targeted. -Peter -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SpamBelt The subscribe

RE: SpamBelt

2003-05-30 Thread Akerlund, Scott
Subject: RE: SpamBelt And in fact, if they send enough of it, their messages are guaranteed to be perfectly targeted. -Peter -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SpamBelt

Re: SpamBelt

2003-05-30 Thread Martin Tuip [MVP]
2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Akerlund, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 12:13 AM Subject: RE: SpamBelt Not only

RE: SpamBelt

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Moir
-Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 May 2003 21:08 To: Exchange Discussions Why would a company who sends me so much SPAM sell a product called SpamSucks!? Especially spam trying to sell me a product called SpamSucks! And sent with a