RE: MTA loop

2002-01-07 Thread Mark Harford
If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin group.

OT: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ... ?

2002-01-07 Thread Adam Romain
Guys, Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what groups exist and what users belong to them ? TIA Adam Romain ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for

RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ?

2002-01-07 Thread Joyce, Louis
Are we talking NT local/global groups? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Command line tool to

RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong to them ... ?

2002-01-07 Thread Adam Romain
Both. Actually, just found it in the resource kit. Global.exe and local.exe Thanks -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2002 10:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what user s belong

RE: Windows 2000 License

2002-01-07 Thread Benjamin Winzenz
This isn't an appropriate question for this forum. You need to be speaking with someone from Trend Micro it sounds like. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002

RE: fix monitor

2002-01-07 Thread Osborn, Joel
Sorry, but you forgot to add your Kelly Only disclaimer, so you can't make any threats. If, in the future, you want to send messages for only Kelly to read, you should add the following: Warning: This message was intended for Kelly only. Anyone else reading this message will die. Of course,

RE: New Virus ShakerWorld variant?

2002-01-07 Thread Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE)
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their current dat download is at 4179. -Original Message- From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM To:

Message Stores

2002-01-07 Thread Michael Anderson
Hello, If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain that we create? Thanks, Mike

RE: Message Stores

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Have you looked at the ASP hosting documentation out at Microsoft.com? I believe there are a number of good white papers on hosting Exchange which cover this in good detail. Tom -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07

RE: Message Stores

2002-01-07 Thread Chris Scharff
If you really need true data separation, you need separate servers in separate Exchange organizations IMHO. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Vinny Avallone
Hello Everyone, I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000. He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at 12M. If I deleted

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread John Matteson
It takes time for the information store to process the deleted items and update. Wait two hours, or have the user exit then go back into the client and check again. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 With sufficient thrust, pigs

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Chris Scharff
This is the folder size in the Outlook client right? Because deleted items in the Exchange admin doesn't correspond to the deleted items folder in the client, and the behavior you are describing would be expected if we're talking about the admin. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Vinny Avallone
Good question, but the answer is Yes it is on the client. I right click on the Deleted Items and Go to properties folder size -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Deleted

Public Folder Default Permissions

2002-01-07 Thread Chris Haaker
By default are Public Folder permissions applied only to Users in the Site the Server holding the public folders resides in? For example Default and Anonymous? Org-wide or Site-wide? TIA! To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly. Samuel Johnson (1709-84);

RE: MTA loop

2002-01-07 Thread Jeremy Pinquist
In response to both your posts - SRS is running, and when i connect with exchange 55 admin and try to delete the phantom server i get the following error: you cannot delete the exchange server because it is still active. Shut the server down and try again. needless to say, there is no server

Problem solved

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Moore
Hello all-- Sometime back I emailed the group about a Mailbox Manager (on E2K) problem. No one in the group was able to help me solve it, but now that I've got it fixed, I thought I'd pass along the info in case it helps anyone else. Specifically, Mailbox Manager quit working after I applied

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Chris Scharff
Try connecting via OWA or with the Exchange client and see if there is anything in the mailbox. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January

OL02 Views not presented correctly

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from this list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation? I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will still show in the

Re: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Kelly_Borndale
What about deletec item retention on the server? And is this after the IS maintenance has run at night? ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another

Exchange 5.5 SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Huot, Denyse
Hi all. I'm looking for a utility that I can run from another server (other than the exchange server) to check mailbox sizes and a listing of attachments in each mailbox. Does anyone know of a utility that can do this with? I know ExMerge will tell me the sizes of each mailbox, but not the

Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Michel, David
I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very simple... I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange 2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Vinny Avallone
We have a 30 day retention level and yes is it after the IS Maintenance. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The Deleted Items folder What about deletec item retention on

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Deaton, Doug
Vinny, Check in Outlook, under the Tools menu, look for Recover deleted items. Recover them and then delete those as well. May resolve your problem. Doug Deaton, MCSE IS Technical Support Sunterra Pacific 425-454-3065 xt 1212 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Vinny Avallone

RE: The Deleted Items folder

2002-01-07 Thread Vinny Avallone
I'll try that. I have to wait until he gets his mail under 98M. There will be 30days of deleted items. -Original Message- From: Deaton, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The Deleted Items folder Vinny, Check

RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder

2002-01-07 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Make sure that you don't have a different version of the form in your Personal Forms Library. It could be that you have published it in two locations by mistake (which is very easy to do since the default location is always Personal Forms Library). If that's the case, your Outlook will never

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread McGilligan, Sean
David, First,I would read the paper disaster recovery. Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each server. I think you are reading into differentials too deeply. Personally I would recommend

RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

2002-01-07 Thread Soysal, Serdar
The evidence is inconclusive. He only admits that his ass is white. -Original Message- From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Ed, you're White?

Clustering Book

2002-01-07 Thread Tener, Richard
Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 adv exchange 2000 adv. Thanks _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Kevin Miller
Use NT backup to dump to file, then use ArgServ to dump that file to tape. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michel, David Sent: Monday, January

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Michel, David
I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full. Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or so

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Don Ely
You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore, when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your use of Differentials is unwarranted D -Original

RE: Public Folder Default Permissions

2002-01-07 Thread Darcy Adams
The permissions on a Public Folder apply to anyone who can reach it. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Default Permissions By default are Public Folder permissions

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Byron Kennedy
you've not accounted for the transaction logs. full nightly backups will take care of your needs. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange I have read it and

RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Lefkovics, William
You might consider just installing the Exchange admin on the remote workstation. Or perhaps ADSI can return the data required. William Lefkovics -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Kevin Miller
READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you pillow 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto re.asp 2k DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a sp --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS,

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Don Ely
Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange READ IT. Learn

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Martin Blackstone
Because they are the Shiznit. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I wonder why that is...

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Kevin Miller
Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I have them at the top of my links to email file. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Don Ely
H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that have been placed out there for our perusal to make our jobs easier. Who'd a thunk it? D -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Clustering Book

2002-01-07 Thread Darryl Harris
Clustering is very hardware dependant. You may wish to try Compaq's course: Implementing Windows 2000 on Compaq ProLiant Clusters http://www.compaq.com/training/364.html Darryl AltaVista -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07,

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Martin Blackstone
I keep a copy of it printed and on top of my recovery box. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And

RE: Clustering Book

2002-01-07 Thread Lefkovics, William
I have some Exchange books clustered on my bookshelf. The whitepapers on the Microsoft site are not bad. What consulting service have you chosen to use for this deployment? If unselected, may I recommend Scharff and Associates? William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Kevin Miller
I think William invented it? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Reading? What's that? Documents? Where am I? :) T. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that

RE: Clustering Book

2002-01-07 Thread Don Ely
I understand Bob Barker has experience in this arena as well... ;o) D -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering Book I have some Exchange books clustered on my

Knowledge Consistency - post SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still experiencing a problem. Was NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller) Exchange 5.5 with SP3 Now NT Server 4.0 with SP6a

RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Andy David
Have you run the Performance Optimizer? -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Dear DL Members, On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of

RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Martin Blackstone
Good answer!! If nobody can access anything, why wait until the middle of the night? Do it now! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4 Have you run

RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder

2002-01-07 Thread Scott Perley-TM
Is there some code on the form that is setting this? In design mode go to Form, View code. The other way may be that the Defer Until field is added on a hidden tab and it has the initial value set. Scott -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,

RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly

2002-01-07 Thread Soysal, Serdar
You just haven't had enough coffee. The conversation header is separate from subject line. So, what you're seeing is by design. It's been there all the time. As a matter of fact, if you set it to group by conversation and sort by conversation index, you'll see that responses within a thread

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Michel, David
As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of

RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear Andy, Yes. After installing SP4, each of the four Servers were rebooted, then I ran Performance Optimizer, then rebooted. I may run Performance Optimizer again, after the reboot at 2:00 AM on Tuesday. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371

RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear Martin, I was not clear enough. E-mail is flowing and being delivered. Users can access their mailboxes. I am not able to open a mailbox using the Exchange Admin Program from the fourth Exchange Server. I can open any mailbox, using the Exchange Admin

RE: MTA loop

2002-01-07 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
MAILBOX may not be running Exchange or even be running, but have you tried pinging the IP address that was associated with that server? If it pings, then you may have your DNS set to resolve that IP to that NetBIOS name. If true, E2K may think that Exchange server is still up and running? I

RE: Orgainzational Form getting put in drafts folder- RESOLVED

2002-01-07 Thread MS Exchange Mailing List
Thanks both Scott and Serdar, The problem was that the Defer Until fieled was added an hidden in the form. Don't know how it got there but dont really care that much anyway. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction Scott. Marty -Original Message- From: Scott Perley-TM

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Don Ely
If your backups are so damn important, why do you use some crappy a$$ backup product like ArcCrap? If your lawyers want so much out of so little, why don't you explain to them that in order to reach their desired goal, they will have to spend some coin to accomplish this? Might I suggest

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Ken Cornetet
You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from the store. -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange As much as I appreciate multiple links

RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
That's what I thought. I have my views configured the way you state (always have), but I'm still seeing weird sorting behavior. I'm seeing it on multiple machines, so I know it's not isolated. I never saw this happen with prior versions. It's probably a config problem. Take a look at the thread

RE: OL02 Views not presented correctly

2002-01-07 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Well, you're right. There is something weird going on. When I grouped by conversation, it did separate on mine, even though I am also running XP. BUT, I have upgraded from 2000 as opposed to a fresh install. The other thing is when you group by conversation you can't sort them. The sorting

RE: Win2k backup and Exchange

2002-01-07 Thread Don Ely
I think our friend is assuming his entire server died. In which case, he'd be what I would consider a reactive admin versus a proactive admin... Servers don't just crash David. There is always something that leads up to the crash and with real hardware in place such as Compaq, Dell, or

Information Store growing rapidly!!!!

2002-01-07 Thread Osama S.
Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my priv IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do and offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB (was 19 went down to 18). Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag

Creating mailbox in MS Exchange5.5

2002-01-07 Thread kalyan
when a user registers on our website, we have to create a mailbox through an ASP page on MS Exchange Server5.5 on a Windows NT4.0 with IIS4.0 and ADSI2.5 installed on it. Since i am new to this please bear with my simple

PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Osama S.
Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly. I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag. The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h). When I checked

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Seitz, Peter
Your posts are duplicating rapidly as well. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Hi, (Exchange 5.5/ SP4) my IS is suddenly growing very

Re: Clustering Book

2002-01-07 Thread missy koslosky
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/182338/qid=1010425818/sr=1-1/ref= sr_1_10_1/107-8403454-7361339 Link may wrap. Missy - Original Message - From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:21 PM Subject:

RE: Outlook 2K Blank Repeating Menu Bars Problem

2002-01-07 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Don't want to sound like a jerk, but if you can't touch it, what good any advice you receive would do? People will make suggestions and you won't be able to try any of them. It looks like a screen refresh problem to me. Maybe she needs an updated video card driver. However, she won't stop

RE: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site

2002-01-07 Thread Martin Blackstone
They communicate through public bussing?? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site Exchange 5.5 servers communicate through the MTA when they're in

How Do I Create Account on Exchange WIth Visual BAsic

2002-01-07 Thread Visual Basic
Hello, Ihad made an application which can make and account automatically on my windows nt but i wanna also make account automatically on my exchange server with the same application can any one help me out. if any one of you write or have the code for that then plz send me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Information Store growing rapidly!!!!

2002-01-07 Thread Flynn Hansen
Osama, Check out this article. Good luck! Troubleshooting a Rapidly Growing Information Store [Q170361] http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q170361 Flynn -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:04 AM To:

Public Folders and Address Book Views

2002-01-07 Thread Osama S.
Hi, I have public folders that I would like to include in the Address Book views. I use Custom Attribute 10 to sort the address book but apparently it has no effect on Public Folders or Distribution List. They get dropped only at the GAL root but not under the created Address book views. Is that

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Martin Blackstone
Here is a favorite... Company makes containers based on departments. Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container. Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff. Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and then put it in the container for

Re: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread missy koslosky
Mailbox sizes won't change after a defrag. The size of the store itself is what changes. Missy - Original Message - From: Osama S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:48 AM Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

eTrust Content Inspection

2002-01-07 Thread BY
Hi there, For those who have used eTrust Content Inspection product? Do you think it is as good as Mimesweper and Surfcontrol email filtering product ? I am still in the learning process to compare these 3 products, so far I have not found any distinct differences? Your comments are certainly

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Mitchell Mike
Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his profile? Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well. Thanks again. Mike -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002

Re: Mailbox Resources Questions

2002-01-07 Thread missy koslosky
Have you looked in your Sent Items? Your calendar? Journal? Contacts? They add up fairly quickly. And every attachment is an item. I haven't a clue as to what's on your D: drive. Can you tell me? Missy - Original Message - From: John Navara [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

RE: Windows 2000 License

2002-01-07 Thread Clayton
It may have changed in the last two years, so contact MS to be sure, but when I purchased it, it was licensed on machine blocks (0-5, 5-25 etc. for example) Trend should be able to clarify this for you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Morgan, Joshua
I actually use several Containers... 1 for Recipients 1 for DL's 1 for Custom Recipients 1 for Special Items PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07,

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Jennifer Baker
Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Martin, Once this admin uses exmerge does the

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Mitchell Mike
Why does the X500 address need to be added? -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as well.

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Bowles, John L.
That is pretty damn funny! ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Jennifer Baker
So old mail sitting in other mailboxes originally from or to the old mailbox will not ndr if there is a continued conversation. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Jennifer Baker
I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount. Virus scanning would cause this. -Original Message- From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM To:

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Morgan, Joshua
Also Mailbox Level Backups PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Jennifer Baker
Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it. -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Also Mailbox Level

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Morgan, Joshua
I know but it is a potential cause of this problem PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Lefkovics, William
I tried it January 1999. But I didn't inhale. William -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions Nobody on this list does that. If they

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Jennifer Baker
Duh I was being sarcastic. /Duh -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions I know but it is a potential cause of this problem

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Doug Hampshire
I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV). Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Andy David
What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go into one container

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Did you have a sex change operation? Tom. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Doug Hampshire
Tragic farm equipment accidents of course. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers What container do you have me in? -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Oh, now his question makes sense. I didn't know about the accident. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Tragic farm equipment accidents of course. -Original

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Andy David
Baa Ram Ewe Baa Ram Ewe -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Containers Tragic farm equipment accidents of course. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Exchange 5.5 SP4

2002-01-07 Thread Chris Scharff
I believe Sherpa Software has a tool which will do this. http://www.sherpasoftware.com/ Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002

RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions

2002-01-07 Thread Morgan, Joshua
Sorry I'm still new to the group. Me not know when you being sarcastic The Duh is on me... PROFITLAB Network Engineer PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM To:

Re: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Daniel Chenault
Joe Smith hires on and goes to work for Mike Bloggs in Engineering. So you create his mailbox in Engineering. A few years later he moves to Marketing to be a technical rep. How do you move his mailbox from the Engineering container to the Marketing containter? You don't. Not without deleting and

Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site

2002-01-07 Thread Daniel Chenault
Well, sorta. The directories talk to each other, er... directly. - Original Message - From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:46 PM Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site Exchange 5.5 servers communicate

RE: Containers

2002-01-07 Thread Kelly_Borndale
Well, he said guys go in one container Does this mean there is something you want to tell us, Andy? What was the *real* reason behind the job switch ;) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax

RE: Mailbox Resources Questions

2002-01-07 Thread John Navara
The D: drive is the location where exchange is loaded on our server. John -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Mailbox Resources Questions Have you looked in your Sent Items?

  1   2   >