If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could
try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the
directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of
the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin
group.
Guys,
Does anyone know of such a tool or a command that can find out what
groups exist and what users belong to them ?
TIA
Adam Romain
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for
Are we talking NT local/global groups?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Adam Romain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2002 10:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: Command line tool to
Both. Actually, just found it in the resource kit. Global.exe and
local.exe
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 January 2002 10:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Command line tool to find out what groups exist and what
user s belong
This isn't an appropriate question for this forum. You need to be speaking
with someone from Trend Micro it sounds like.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002
Sorry, but you forgot to add your Kelly Only disclaimer, so you can't make
any threats.
If, in the future, you want to send messages for only Kelly to read, you
should add the following:
Warning: This message was intended for Kelly only. Anyone else reading this
message will die.
Of course,
OAR.NET has seen it and issued a warning to us, which is why I posted the
message. NAI states that DAT file 4180 will catch this virus, but their
current dat download is at 4179.
-Original Message-
From: Joe User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 5:11 PM
To:
Hello,
If we are hosting multiple domains, and it's critical to separate
the data from one company to the other for security reasons, would
we need to create a message store for each and every virtual domain
that we create?
Thanks,
Mike
Have you looked at the ASP hosting documentation out at Microsoft.com? I
believe there are a number of good white papers on hosting Exchange
which cover this in good detail.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07
If you really need true data separation, you need separate servers in
separate Exchange organizations IMHO.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Michael Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hello Everyone,
I have a user using Outlook 2000 with Exchange 2000.
He is at his mailbox limit size (100M). HE had about 12M worth of
deleted items. So he Emptied Deleted Items, but if I view the Folder
Size it still says it is about 12M. No matter what I do it stays at
12M. If I deleted
It takes time for the information store to process the deleted items and
update.
Wait two hours, or have the user exit then go back into the client and check
again.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
With sufficient thrust, pigs
This is the folder size in the Outlook client right? Because deleted items
in the Exchange admin doesn't correspond to the deleted items folder in the
client, and the behavior you are describing would be expected if we're
talking about the admin.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
Good question, but the answer is Yes it is on the client.
I right click on the Deleted Items and Go to properties folder size
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The Deleted
By default are Public Folder permissions applied only to Users in the Site
the Server holding the public folders resides in? For example Default and
Anonymous? Org-wide or Site-wide?
TIA!
To keep your secret is wisdom; but to expect others to keep it is folly.
Samuel Johnson (1709-84);
In response to both your posts -
SRS is running, and when i connect with exchange 55 admin and try to
delete the phantom server i get the following error:
you cannot delete the exchange server because it is still active. Shut
the server down and try again. needless to say, there is no server
Hello all--
Sometime back I emailed the group about a Mailbox Manager (on E2K) problem. No one in
the group was able to help me solve it, but now that I've got it fixed, I thought I'd
pass along the info in case it helps anyone else.
Specifically, Mailbox Manager quit working after I applied
Try connecting via OWA or with the Exchange client and see if there is
anything in the mailbox.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January
Has anyone noticed that OL 2002 does some odd things with posts from
this list when you have your view set to Group by Conversation?
I noticed that if you have your view set to Group by Conversation, and
someone replies to a post and changes the Subject line, the post will
still show in the
What about deletec item retention on the server? And is this after the IS
maintenance has run at night?
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another
Hi all.
I'm looking for a utility that I can run from another server (other than the
exchange server) to check mailbox sizes and a listing of attachments in each
mailbox. Does anyone know of a utility that can do this with?
I know ExMerge will tell me the sizes of each mailbox, but not the
I realize there are no stupid questions but only stupid people who ask
questions so I'll throw my hat into the stupid ring as this is probably very
simple...
I finally got my boss to buy a DLT drive exclusively for each of my Exchange
2000 servers. From all I've read here and elsewhere I
We have a 30 day retention level and yes is it after the IS Maintenance.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: The Deleted Items folder
What about deletec item retention on
Vinny,
Check in Outlook, under the Tools menu, look for Recover deleted items.
Recover them and then delete those as well. May resolve your problem.
Doug Deaton, MCSE
IS Technical Support
Sunterra Pacific
425-454-3065 xt 1212
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Vinny Avallone
I'll try that.
I have to wait until he gets his mail under 98M. There will be 30days
of deleted items.
-Original Message-
From: Deaton, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: The Deleted Items folder
Vinny,
Check
Make sure that you don't have a different version of the form in your
Personal Forms Library. It could be that you have published it in two
locations by mistake (which is very easy to do since the default location is
always Personal Forms Library). If that's the case, your Outlook will never
David,
First,I would read the paper disaster recovery.
Second,I would ask the question why can you not do full (normal) backups
every day unless of course your data outstrips your tape size on each
server.
I think you are reading into differentials too deeply.
Personally I would recommend
The evidence is inconclusive. He only admits that his ass is white.
-Original Message-
From: John Q [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question
Ed, you're White?
Does anyone know of a good book to read for implementing clustering on an
exchange server. I want to upgrade windows nt 4.0 exchange 5.5 to windows
2000 adv exchange 2000 adv.
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ:
Use NT backup to dump to file, then use ArgServ to dump that file to
tape.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michel, David
Sent: Monday, January
I have read it and I want to reiterate that I do plan on doing a nightly
full backup. However, since the Exchange server has it's own tape backup
system, I would also like to do differentials in addition to the full.
Therefore, should a complete crash happen I'm backed up to within an hour or
so
You've never heard of database logging have you? In the event of a restore,
when the IS is restored and the transaction logs are replayed, you have lost
nothing. You can restore right up to the point of failure. Therefore your
use of Differentials is unwarranted
D
-Original
The permissions on a Public Folder apply to anyone who can reach it.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Default Permissions
By default are Public Folder permissions
you've not accounted for the transaction logs. full nightly backups will
take care of your needs.
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
I have read it and
You might consider just installing the Exchange admin on the remote
workstation.
Or perhaps ADSI can return the data required.
William Lefkovics
-Original Message-
From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
READ IT. Learn it. Love it. Tell it nice things. Sleep with it under you
pillow
5.5 DR white paper
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administration/55/BackupResto
re.asp
2k DR white paper
http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/e2krecovery.a
sp
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS,
Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I
wonder why that is... ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
READ IT. Learn
Because they are the Shiznit.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Geee That's the second time in a week we've seen these links. I
wonder why that is...
Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And the fact that I
have them at the top of my links to email file.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that have been
placed out there for our perusal to make our jobs easier.
Who'd a thunk it?
D
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Clustering is very hardware dependant.
You may wish to try Compaq's course:
Implementing Windows 2000 on Compaq ProLiant Clusters
http://www.compaq.com/training/364.html
Darryl
AltaVista
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07,
I keep a copy of it printed and on top of my recovery box.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
Could it ... Because everyone should read then don? And
I have some Exchange books clustered on my bookshelf.
The whitepapers on the Microsoft site are not bad. What consulting service
have you chosen to use for this deployment? If unselected, may I recommend
Scharff and Associates?
William
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard
I think William invented it?
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Drive thru Admin, Would you like Fries with that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Reading? What's that? Documents? Where am I? :)
T.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
H. What a novel concept! Actually reading documents that
I understand Bob Barker has experience in this arena as well... ;o)
D
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering Book
I have some Exchange books clustered on my
Dear DL Members,
On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of four Exchange Servers, on
Site. I did not re-apply SP6a afterwards. Three are fine, one is still
experiencing a problem.
Was
NT Server 4.0 with SP6a (not a domain controller)
Exchange 5.5 with SP3
Now
NT Server 4.0 with SP6a
Have you run the Performance Optimizer?
-Original Message-
From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Dear DL Members,
On Saturday, I applied SP4 to four out of
Good answer!!
If nobody can access anything, why wait until the middle of the night? Do it
now!
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Knowledge Consistency - post SP4
Have you run
Is there some code on the form that is setting this? In design mode go to
Form, View code. The other way may be that the Defer Until field is added
on a hidden tab and it has the initial value set.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
You just haven't had enough coffee. The conversation header is separate
from subject line. So, what you're seeing is by design. It's been there
all the time. As a matter of fact, if you set it to group by conversation
and sort by conversation index, you'll see that responses within a thread
As much as I appreciate multiple links and sarcastic comments, I do not see
anywhere in the whitepaper from either 5.5 or 2000 on how you can roll logs
forward IF THE LOGS AREN'T THERE... Have you ever heard of a full system
crash? Although I admit it is much less likely than any other type of
Dear Andy,
Yes.
After installing SP4, each of the four Servers were rebooted, then I
ran Performance Optimizer, then rebooted.
I may run Performance Optimizer again, after the reboot at 2:00 AM
on Tuesday.
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
Dear Martin,
I was not clear enough.
E-mail is flowing and being delivered. Users can access their
mailboxes.
I am not able to open a mailbox using the Exchange Admin Program
from the fourth Exchange Server.
I can open any mailbox, using the Exchange Admin
MAILBOX may not be running Exchange or even be running, but have you tried
pinging the IP address that was associated with that server? If it pings,
then you may have your DNS set to resolve that IP to that NetBIOS name. If
true, E2K may think that Exchange server is still up and running? I
Thanks both Scott and Serdar,
The problem was that the Defer Until fieled was added an hidden in the
form. Don't know how it got there but dont really care that much
anyway. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction Scott.
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Scott Perley-TM
If your backups are so damn important, why do you use some crappy a$$ backup
product like ArcCrap? If your lawyers want so much out of so little, why
don't you explain to them that in order to reach their desired goal, they
will have to spend some coin to accomplish this? Might I suggest
You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from the store.
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
As much as I appreciate multiple links
That's what I thought. I have my views configured the way you state
(always
have), but I'm still seeing weird sorting behavior. I'm seeing it on
multiple machines, so I know it's not isolated. I never saw this happen
with
prior versions.
It's probably a config problem.
Take a look at the thread
Well, you're right. There is something weird going on. When I grouped by
conversation, it did separate on mine, even though I am also running XP.
BUT, I have upgraded from 2000 as opposed to a fresh install. The other
thing is when you group by conversation you can't sort them. The sorting
I think our friend is assuming his entire server died. In which case, he'd
be what I would consider a reactive admin versus a proactive admin...
Servers don't just crash David. There is always something that leads up
to the crash and with real hardware in place such as Compaq, Dell, or
Hi,
(Exchange 5.5/ SP4)
my priv IS is suddenly growing very rapidly.
I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used
ESEUTIL to do and offline defrag.
The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB (was 19 went down to 18). Now the
IS has grown again about +2GB since that defrag
when a user registers on our website, we have to create a mailbox through
an ASP page on MS Exchange Server5.5 on a Windows NT4.0 with IIS4.0 and
ADSI2.5 installed on it.
Since i am new to this please bear with my simple
Hi,
(Exchange 5.5/ SP4)
my IS is suddenly growing very rapidly.
I checked the integrity of the priv.edb using ISINTEG and also used
ESEUTIL to do an offline defrag.
The offline Defrag recovered about 1GB. Now the IS has grown again about
+2GB since that defrag (2GB in 8h).
When I checked
Your posts are duplicating rapidly as well.
-Original Message-
From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Hi,
(Exchange 5.5/ SP4)
my IS is suddenly growing very
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/182338/qid=1010425818/sr=1-1/ref=
sr_1_10_1/107-8403454-7361339
Link may wrap.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Tener, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 12:21 PM
Subject:
Don't want to sound like a jerk, but if you can't touch it, what good any
advice you receive would do? People will make suggestions and you won't be
able to try any of them.
It looks like a screen refresh problem to me. Maybe she needs an updated
video card driver. However, she won't stop
They communicate through public bussing??
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site
Exchange 5.5 servers communicate through the MTA when they're in
Hello,
Ihad made an application which can make and account automatically on my
windows nt but i wanna also make account automatically on my exchange
server with the same application can any one help me out. if any one of
you write or have the code for that then plz send me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osama,
Check out this article. Good luck!
Troubleshooting a Rapidly Growing Information Store [Q170361]
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q170361
Flynn
-Original Message-
From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:04 AM
To:
Hi,
I have public folders that I would like to include in the Address Book
views. I use Custom Attribute 10 to sort the address book but apparently
it has no effect on Public Folders or Distribution List. They get dropped
only at the GAL root but not under the created Address book views.
Is that
Here is a favorite...
Company makes containers based on departments.
Joe works for Executive Management and is put in the appropriate container.
Joe gets a demotion to janitorial staff.
Lame Exch admin now has to Exmerge his email out, delete the account and
then put it in the container for
Mailbox sizes won't change after a defrag. The size of the store itself is
what changes.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Osama S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 6:48 AM
Subject: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Hi there,
For those who have used eTrust Content Inspection product? Do you think
it is as good as Mimesweper and Surfcontrol email filtering product ? I
am still in the learning process to compare these 3 products, so far I
have not found any distinct differences?
Your comments are certainly
Martin,
Once this admin uses exmerge does the new janitor have to rebuild his
profile?
Thanks.. I like things explained so I can understand. You did that well.
Thanks again.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
Have you looked in your Sent Items? Your calendar? Journal? Contacts?
They add up fairly quickly. And every attachment is an item.
I haven't a clue as to what's on your D: drive. Can you tell me?
Missy
- Original Message -
From: John Navara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
It may have changed in the last two years, so contact MS to be sure, but when I
purchased it, it was licensed on machine blocks (0-5, 5-25 etc. for example) Trend
should be able to clarify this for you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
I actually use several Containers...
1 for Recipients
1 for DL's
1 for Custom Recipients
1 for Special Items
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07,
Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as
well.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
Martin,
Once this admin uses exmerge does the
Why does the X500 address need to be added?
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
Not only that, but an x500 address needs to be added to the new mailbox as
well.
That is pretty damn funny!
___
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange
So old mail sitting in other mailboxes originally from or to the old mailbox
will not ndr if there is a continued conversation.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
I also noticed in Exchange Admin on the Mailboxes resources table it quite
frequently shows the Exchange Administrative Account as the NT Acccount.
Virus scanning would cause this.
-Original Message-
From: Osama S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:48 AM
To:
Also Mailbox Level Backups
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of
Nobody on this list does that. If they do, I hope they don't admit it.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Also Mailbox Level
I know but it is a potential cause of this problem
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS
I tried it January 1999. But I didn't inhale.
William
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
Nobody on this list does that. If they
Duh
I was being sarcastic.
/Duh
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PRIV IS rapidly growing out of proportions
I know but it is a potential cause of this problem
I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go
into one container since I don't rate guys on attractiveness (YMMV).
Then I put all IT chicks into a container called Totally Hot. As evidence
for this, may I point out Kelly, Kimmie, Missy, Jennifer, Michele (yes, I'm
What container do you have me in?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
I put them all into containers based on attractiveness. First all guys go
into one container
Did you have a sex change operation?
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
What container do you have me in?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire
Tragic farm equipment accidents of course.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
What container do you have me in?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire
Oh, now his question makes sense. I didn't know about the accident.
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
Tragic farm equipment accidents of course.
-Original
Baa Ram Ewe
Baa Ram Ewe
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Containers
Tragic farm equipment accidents of course.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
I believe Sherpa Software has a tool which will do this.
http://www.sherpasoftware.com/
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Huot, Denyse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002
Sorry I'm still new to the group.
Me not know when you being sarcastic
The Duh is on me...
PROFITLAB
Network Engineer
PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 2:55 PM
To:
Joe Smith hires on and goes to work for Mike Bloggs in Engineering. So you
create his mailbox in Engineering. A few years later he moves to Marketing
to be a technical rep. How do you move his mailbox from the Engineering
container to the Marketing containter?
You don't. Not without deleting and
Well, sorta. The directories talk to each other, er... directly.
- Original Message -
From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: 2 EXCH 5.5 Servers in 1 site
Exchange 5.5 servers communicate
Well, he said guys go in one container Does this mean there is
something you want to tell us, Andy? What was the *real* reason behind the
job switch ;)
~
-K.Borndale
Network Administrator
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
The D: drive is the location where exchange is loaded on our server.
John
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mailbox Resources Questions
Have you looked in your Sent Items?
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo