Don-
Weren't you referring him to sections 1.6 and 1.7 of the FAQ? In which case
you'd be right.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Archives of this list?
Ahhh.. I see you
Perhaps Sam has an older version? I see that v2.1 has recently been
released, and they specifically mention a template for Exch 2000 servers.
Haven't had a chance to test it yet
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/
tools/locktool.asp
Hunter
Q235528?
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Kungju Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox Size discrepancy in Exchange Server and Outlook
That is where we checked for the size, from the Root Level
There is
Do a couple of disaster recovery drills, and then you'll know how long it
takes to recover servers in your environment. Hardware, software,
configuration, and operator skills are going to vary from shop to shop, and
so recovery times are going to vary as well.
Hunter
-Original Message-
I have some Perl scripts that will do the basic stuff. Anyone's welcome to
them
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Analyzer Software
Along with the others mentioned
Why do you want to change the location of the log file?
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Edgington, Jeffrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ntbackup, E2K and logs
yeah... that kinda sucks... I just finished
the backup logs in the same place.
It just seems that on a Server Product like Win2k Server, backup should
be a
system function.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ntbackup, E2K
Is that 1027 reported in the 5.5 tracking log, or E2k log? I can't find it
in my 5.5 logs and Q173364 doesn't mention it.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: IRELAND,MIKE (HP-Corvallis,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
It is reported in the E2K logs. See Q246959 for E2K tracking log event
descriptions.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: performance monitoring
Is that 1027 reported
PSS has a tool that will reset the KMS admin password for Exch 5.5; they may
have one for Exch 2000 as well.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Laurentiu Bogdan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: KMS administrator password
Upgrade in what respect? Hardware? OS? Exchange? Any other applications
running on the box? Any bottlenecks with your current setup (processor,
memory, disk, network...)? How hard do the users hit the box? Are the
auto-emails for internal addresses or external addresses? Do you have an
SMTP
number of heavy users.
Are the auto-emails for internal addresses or external addresses? Auto
emails are to external addresses
Thanks in Advance for all your help.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
addresses
Thanks in Advance for all your help.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Hardware Requirements
Upgrade in what respect? Hardware? OS? Exchange? Any other
Are messages from all uconn users in the @uconnvm.uconn.edu format, or just
a few users? If it's the latter, those people may be using POP3 clients, in
which case they could put anything they want in the reply-to field,
regardless of what the IT folks recommend.
Hunter
-Original
A couple of options, depending on the version of Exchange you're running,
are at
http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q256862
You can easily export the Exch 5.5 directory to a CSV file, modify the
Primary Windows NT Account value, and import it back to reduce the chance of
skipping a mailbox
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini
The MS Exchange 2000 Internals: Quick Tuning Guide
(http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtech
nol/exchange/exchange2000/maintain/optimize/exchtune.asp) says to use the
/3GB switch on servers with 1GB of RAM (or more). Pierre Bijaoui says the
same thing in his
tracking.zip at http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm
Not nearly as swell as Promodag, but it's free ;-)
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox monitoring
How many disks do you have available? Can you rebuild with one mirror set
(OS and Logs) [or better, 2 mirror sets, one each for OS and Logs] and a
RAID5 set for the databases? Do you have a battery on your controller? If
so, you can consider turning on write-back caching if it's not already on.
FAQ, 3.61
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:John.Matteson;geac.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MAPI Error when starting Exchange Admin on the Server
Good morning to you
That was part of the problem...we went to the link on their site for our IP
address, but no information was available on the specific message. It just
gave a date that showed when we were first blacklisted. We spent about 2
days trying to get additional information from them. They finally sent us
If you try to run forestprep first, and choose to join an existing 5.5 site,
it will fail saying that it can't find the ADC. The Deployment guide has a
flowchart showing the ADC installation first, then forestprep, then
domainprep.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams
-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman;state.mt.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
That was part of the problem...we went to the link on their
site for our IP
address, but no information was available on the specific
message
thinking that someone does not check the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox.
;)
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:hcoleman;state.mt.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
I'm thinking there's a connection between SPAMCop and George
seem to get outlook to check those boxes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Coleman, Hunter
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
hostmaster@, postmaster@, and abuse@ all get
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?releaseid=43346
Have a look at that document. It has suggestions for perfmon counters to
watch.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Marshall, Ben F. [mailto:ben.marshall;usaa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:07 AM
To: Exchange
Go to http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
Search for directory service mailbox in the
microsoft.public.exchange.admin newsgroup. You'll get several hits that
describe how to log into the DS mailbox
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:Paul.Bendall;DrKW.com]
You can't join a 5.5 Org to an E2K server. You can join an E2K server to an
existing 5.5 ORG, but only if you have the ADC installed first.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Look at the Disk Queue Length counters on the PhysicalDisk object. Values
for these should be zero or very low on a sustained basis. Higher numbers
indicate that the disk subsystem can't keep up with the I/O requests.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I think you should be able to modify the properties of the CA using
ADSIEdit. The attribute should be msExchServer2ExportContainer, and you'd
enter the LDAP path to the specific server's Recipients container.
Check Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design ISBN 182451 for
more information
You might want to check the MSExchangeMTA\Deferred Delivery Queue against
the MSExchangeIS Private\Send Queue to see if those match up.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
http://www.e2ksecurity.com/
Check out The Book references on the right side of that page. I think it's
supposed to be available any day now
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Any chance the NTFS permissions got changed on the \exchsrvr\imcdata\
directories? Or that it's corruption of the filesystem, which is reflecting
as corruption of the IMC mailbox?
Can you appropriate another machine (workstation even) to build as a second
IMC and take some, or all, of the load
contract here is in a state of flux
and we won't be getting any new servers in and I'm not sure we have a
workstation that could handle the load.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 7:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
reports.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMS Corruption...
What kind of traffic do you get? We're handling 40,000+
messages per day through our primary IMC, running
Q248488 talks to Exch 5.0, but may apply in your situation
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: TechEd
unfortunately this is an all 5.5 site . . . no Exchange 2000 yet . . .
I have
http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm
Scripts there that will generate email usage reports per user, breaking out
internal mail, external mail, # of messages, size of messages, etc. You'll
need to have Message Tracking enabled, as was already mentioned
Hunter
-Original Message-
:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
what about attachment names, sizes, mimemtypes? all very usefull stuff
mike
- Original Message -
From: Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: RE: Tracking email use to save
Roger has posted a nice collection of books on AD at
http://www.wiredeuclid.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=booksfile=indexreq=
view_subcatsid=7min=0orderby=titleAshow=8 (url will probably wrap)
I've had good luck with Alistair Lowe-Norris' book, but mainly use it as a
scripting reference.
Hunter
You're on the right track for clearing out the orphans (or zombies).
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;316886, specifically
the section Prepare Exchange Server 5.5 for Migration
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
Check with Sybari, but I believe that when you license Antigen you get one
engine license included.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: by [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
Does that mean
I've seen the same thing on 2 boxes, one production and one test. I don't
think it's worm/blaster related, as the test box is on that I recently built
on an isolated network, with no box on that network having ever been on a
live segment. It's not running Exchange, either. The only fix that I've
Are you seeing disk queue counters higher than they should be on your RAID5
set? If not, then rebuilding it as RAID10 likely won't buy you anything.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 11:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
43 matches
Mail list logo
