4 Primary IS Servers totalling 224GB of IS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 02:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
4 Primary IS Servers totalling 100GB of IS.
-Original
Hi all,
New to the group however I've been watching for some time.
This is in no way a flame posting, however I seek information regarding
the clustering of Exchange 2000 servers.
Could anyone point out any good reference points - be they web or book?
I've searched high and low on various
for some info on Exchange 2000 Clusters.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246265.html
Hope this helps
Regards
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange clustering
Hi
2001 08:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange clustering
I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001
: Why Bother?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange clustering
Hi all,
New to the group however I've been watching
: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange clustering
Thanks to all for your input. It is most appreciated :-)
I'm actually researching it both for myself and for an idea based around
running exchange and doing
With regard to SendMail, IIRC it records logs regarding the transaction
(IP's, To/From etc) but does not keep the body of the message.
It's designed to be quick and efficient - having it log every single
tx/rx would be inefficient, but it is possible to enable it.
Rgds..
-Original
Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+
per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday.
:-(
-Original Message-
From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test
Really sorry to do
]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange clustering
I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joe D. Llewelyn
In my experience, I just leave my house exchange server on for long
enough and that'll make it go splat :-)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 10:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
Hi all,
Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-)
Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the
floppy drive?
A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange
2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only
that the weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+
per
day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday
Bit like what most of Sir Bonfield's speeches are like then..
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant.
Regards
Mr
Heard about the Jedi thing two months ago.
On the radio whilst I was fiddling with my Exchange server.
So now it's sort-of relevant to the topic. Take it to a 1-2-1 email
session kidz.
:-(
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 October 2001
14 matches
Mail list logo
