Sounds like his userid and Exchange alias are now different, so he'll
need to log into OWA using DOMAIN\userid\alias format.
Domainname\JoeUserOld\JoeUser or whatever it is.
Huh. Maybe I got that backwards. Maybe it needs to be
Domainname\joeuser\joeuserold now. I can't remember.
These
: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.
I'll take the OWA one. :)
The only version info I saw in the email was one reference to one
Exchange 2000 server. You'd use a frontend-backend scenario
It comes with online documentation. Is there a part of it that isn't
self-explanatory? I must be missing some cool features.
-Original Message-
From: Khin Thuzar Nu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:45 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS
servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
it on your
PC. Rename
IE's executable so only you know where to find it.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT)
What OS? How savvy
so does we-blocker (www.we-blocker.com). Freeware and very
configurable. Worth a look, for the price.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:42 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: blocking internet access
If it gets a not found error, it wasn't successful. It'll appear
right after the attempt in your logs.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:37 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Code red
Subject:
Nope, there isn't a box that just receives all mail with misspelled smtp
addresses. There was a conversation a month or so ago (on the E2k list
perhaps? don't remember couldn't find it real quickly), about whether
this violates the letter, or just the spirit, of pertinent RFCs. The
best way I
://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
There is no greater waste as a waste of time.
-
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:36 PM
I crossed a busy street without looking last week, and didn't get hit by
a car.
(yup, I noticed you put in the crucial YMMV, Tom!)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 01:36 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Try using domain\userid\alias.
And try to type out the entire words and include necessary punctuation.
when you're asking a question. It borders on unintelligible. Unless
your ISP charges you per byte, in wch cs I undrstd n smpthz. Othr thn
tht, xpln urslf mor flly.
-Original
?)
may not be this
chap's first language?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2001 11:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent
Try using domain\userid\alias.
And try to type out the entire words and include
The thread from 7.25.2001, titled The Last Few Days... Assault
rob, actually.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:39 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please
I'm gonna guess the recipient bounced it as against its security
policies. Kind of a weird message. Initiate an SMTP session by hand,
and see where it happens.
-Original Message-
From: Dumke, Jane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:29 PM
Posted To:
So when you go into ESM Org Recipients and start right-clicking and
looking at security settings, what groups can read, whether the security
perms inherit or not, do you have any insights? Pretend it's a file
they can't see on an NTFS volume somewhere, troubleshoot just like that.
Group
Two comments, neither of which will immediately solve your problem[1]:
1. You're saying that you have a MAPI client installed on your Exchange
server[2]? Generally considered A Bad Idea.
2. Nobody will touch it until you prove that the script isn't causing
the problems? It's generally
Good point, Lori. Yes, I use an antivirus scanner that has a MAPI
interface. I don't, however, use it in MAPI scan mode. I use that
antivirus API in conjunction with a gateway scanner. The reason I don't
use it in MAPI is because I get unspecified mapi error. So now I'm
laughing at myself.
Oh great, we've found another knowledge gap in my brain. Like I needed
more. What on earth is a tail for outbound mail, and how would I
enter it as an SMTP address? In general, I mean. I don't use Exchange
5.5 anymore, so maybe they've replaced it in Exchange 2000 with another
animal body
it - the state won't buy me a spare pix ;) )
Tom Meunier
Network Administrator
State of Texas Office of Court Administration
(512) 463-0282
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Saturday, August 25, 2001 8:42 AM
Posted
-
From: Tom Meunier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 1:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: CISCO Pix FixUp Protocol
This has been a continuing sticking point between our Cisco person and
me. I insist that he turn it off, and he doesn't like it one bit
I told you that last Wednesday. I'm glad you solved it, though.
-Original Message-
From: Adil Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:19 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Outlook asking password again and again. Plz hurry
Subject: RE:
...and keep in mind that the multiple copies issue may not be as
severe as it seems, at first blush. You do have SIS, after all, so as
long as they're not changing it and sticking it back in the store, it's
somewhat mitigated.
Having said that, one of the banes of my existence is people who
Erik,
You didn't resore the directory, did you? You should restore only the
IS, and the KCC will create the directory for you.
-tom
-Original Message-
From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:11 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Under the Advanced tab of your Exchange Server properties, in your
profile, what's the Logon Network Security set to?
Here's the little help doodad they give you:
Specifies a password authentication option. To log on to Microsoft
Exchange Server with the same network security password that you
: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restore of Exchange 5.5 But Not Mail Account Access
Erik,
You didn't resore the directory, did you? You should restore only the
IS, and the KCC will create the directory for you
if it is Geocities, which I also hate.
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1236/nomime.html
Tom Meunier
Network Administrator
State of Texas
Office of Court Administration
(512) 463-0282
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1236/nomime.html
-Original Message-
From: Martin
Because you can't change it in any other major product, either. This is
a client-side issue. I can put whatever I want in it, no matter what
type of SMTP box I'm bouncing it off, as long as it's open for me to
relay through. It's no different from the subject line or the to: line.
I can type
I respect the sentiment, Larry. Perhaps someone (not me! I'm overworked
and far too lazy) ought to write a FAQ along the lines of the [glowing
adjective] Andrew S. Baker's [glowing adjective]
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=~Help.TXT from his [glowing
adjective] knowledge base.
But I
Anthony Sollars' solution given in this thread will work within the
parameters you've stated.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Kerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 04:47 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: how can I notify through
You just completely changed the parameters of your question. You said
that incoming messages to a mailbox should fire an outgoing SMTP
message. Where did public folders get involved? And you didn't say
forwarding mail, you said send a preformatted notification message.
-Original
I would re-examine your stance on requiring authentication. They're
typing in their password anyway, for POP3 retrieval. What's so
difficult about clicking the mouse on the box that says SMTP requires
auth?
-Original Message-
From: Mailing List per Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
You can open relaying up by originating IP address. I don't remember
where it is in 5.5, because I'm an Admin Of Very Little Brain. I assume
that this server connects to you via a fixed IP address, or at least a
DHCP range from the ISP that would be able to narrow it down... Is that
what
What version? I wouldn't run the file scanner, or NAV for NT, or
whatever you call it; but I use NAV for MS Exchange here, and it's
worked like a champ.
NAV for NT is for file servers and workstations, not for database
servers. If you insist on running it, exclude the Exchange directories
from
]]
Posted At: Thursday, August 30, 2001 03:54 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Norton AntiVorus scan on exchange server 5.5
Subject: RE: Norton AntiVorus scan on exchange server 5.5
It's version 7.01 --Norton AntiVirus engine.
--- Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
a store AND a PST)
Tom Meunier
Network Administrator
State of Texas
Office of Court Administration
(512) 463-0282
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, August 31, 2001 09:49 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP
$245 will get you back online with PSS. This may be a wise $245.
Tom Meunier
Network Administrator
State of Texas
Office of Court Administration
(512) 463-0282
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jonj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
Hotmail is not able to find a route to the domain xxx.xxx.
I would have problems sending there too; it's not a valid internet
domain.
If you'd be forthcoming with xxx.xxx, this would go a whole lot faster.
-Original Message-
From: Venkatna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At:
Mine was 16gb overnight. Sorry I can't be more specific - I would guess
8 hours or so, but it was back in March and I'm aging quickly now... I
wasn't really timing it; I gave myself the whole weekend was pleased
at the response.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
Do you have a Cisco Pix? On your telnet to [public ip:25] do you get a
220 and a bunch of *** or a valid 220 banner page
indicating the SMTP server, version, time, etc? Bunch of indicates
Cisco Mailguard is most likely the problem. Disable it or upgrade it
with no fixup
I hope you've already called PSS, but you want forceful?
http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/
I think I'd have security escort that utility out of the building, if it
were headed toward a production server. I'd pay PSS.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL
vscan.pacific.net.ph and pob1.pacific.net.ph are playing hot-potato with
the email. I'd say you have a misconfigured virus scanner, guessing
from the dns name of the machine.
-Original Message-
From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, September 07, 2001 09:06 AM
Oddly enough, there was a FAQ about this appended to the bottom of your
message. And now twice, at the bottom of this one.
I'll prepend it, too:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm
-Original Message-
From: msxlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Saturday,
FYI, here's a link I trust a bit more than
earthlink.com/~some_guy/H4CKZ/
http://www.msexchange.org/how_to/passwords.htm
-Original Message-
From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 10, 2001 01:49 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
May I suggest, until you upgrade to Enterprise, and if you come out of
this with your store and your job...
Mailbox manager, (go find out what it is) and start deleting stuff over
30 days old in peoples' deleted items box. Bet you save a bunch of
space. I'm making the assumption that mailbox
-mail: the entire history of the Poor
Brazilian Guy Who Have Earned The Mission of Riding The Exchange Server
5.5
On-The-Fly with no Trainning Support
Laercio Santos Jr
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
server for mail
No, but it successfully halts mail checking, recieving and sending when
installed improperly on mail, relay, antivirus and generally all servers
to do with mail or web.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:35 PM
Probably 15 whacko groups are going to claim responsibility before this
is done. Please let's not participate in the immediate targetting (and
attacks) of the Muslim faithful, or people who have been displaced or
displeased by highly complex Middle Eastern politics, as was done in
1993 after two
Umm nice. How long until you care enough about your late lamented
friend to find out that Mogadishu isn't in Ethiopia? Your geopolitical
insights seem to jive well with your geopolitical knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At:
It's FAQ4.1. That FAQ is available in downloadable PDF format, and
should be required reading for anyone who even TOUCHES an exchange box.
4.1 Q: How do I add legalese, footers, or disclaimers to all my
messages?
A1:http://www.dbsinyc.com/DBSI/exchange
A2: MIMESweeper
A3: MMS
I love that number. It always picks up while I'm idiotically twirling
my finger in circles, trying to locate the Q on my telephone keypad.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:18 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
www.nyredcross.org accepts online donations; it's the local chapter.
www.uwnyc.org is the New York City United Way; it also accepts online
donations.
As Eric said, much more direct.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 13,
Your users are logging in as DOMAINNAME\userid, then password, right?
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:58 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: :-) RE: Internal Anon... Email for Exchange
Subject: OWA
And CSVDE. Maybe easier for novices.
http://www.swynk.com/friends/policht/Art112100.asp
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:02 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Importing name in the AD(ex2000)
Uh... what the hell is THAT about? Mr. di Nardo ruin one of K-Mart's
servers or something? If so, your assessment of his competence is a
matter between you him. If not, your judgement of his competence
should probably be kept to yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar
You're wrong. You must get paid a lot to reformat production servers.
TS gets reinstalled whenever you add or remove a networking component to
Windows 2000 server[1], so you'd be reformatting your server to add
Print Services for Unix, because you wanted to create a print queue to a
printer down
.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 14:34
Subject: RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed
You're wrong. You must get paid a lot to reformat production servers.
TS gets reinstalled
...and if it's a child domain, not even then.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Sunday, September 16, 2001 12:32 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Help Ex2k member and 2 DC's (2nd DC down )
Subject: RE: Help Ex2k member and 2 DC's
.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 14:34
Subject: RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed
You're wrong. You must get paid a lot to reformat
I wish I didn't know the answer to this one: C:\shared\
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 03:02 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: New Virus / Worm ??
Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ??
What
Sounds like a mail loop. Put limits on your mailboxes. Restrict send
at nn megabytes. That will stop it for the moment, if that's what it
is, and buy you some time to react. Now go get a good online backup of
your server to get rid of all the 5mb log files. (You have a whole
bunch of them,
of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Urgent , space is full very fast
Sounds like a mail loop. Put limits on your mailboxes. Restrict send
Pete, removing the scripts directory is just one of many, many
suggestions in the securing IIS whitepaper you'll find at
www.microsoft.com/security. They even have a tool to run a default
lockdown.
Oh, and they've got a thingy that will lock out any request for *.exe,
*.cmd, malformed URLs,
Mary Lou,
You really should have all of it on your Exchange Server. There's a big
old huge list of reasons why not, in an appendix to the FAQ. You lose a
huge measure of manageability when you let them start keeping PSTs on
their desktop, on a file server, in the trunk of their car, in a
Huh, I've visited it a few times this morning, and it's up now. Maybe
he was patching or something?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:57 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: today's admin
Kuminda's definition of cooking has three components[1]
1. Heating
2. Boiling
3. Mixing
[1] If you have to do more than one for the same foodstuff, put the
stuff back and find a restaurant. :)
-Original Message-
From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday,
Every once in a while, buy a bunch of Krispy Kreme donuts and hide a
reference to the fact that the first five people to come ask for them
will get half a dozen. The first three people to respond to this email
get every Feb 30th off for the rest of the century, paid double salary.
Give 'em a
Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to report this
info to him. About a month ago, I'd say. I don't know how many people
forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS
ratio affected the move rate, but he may have his results in compiled
form. My
...or maybe she won't create PUBLICALLY ACCESSIBLE SHARES on an Exchange
box, perhaps. Or browse the web or read her email from it.
You identify your points of possible infection, and you protect them. I
don't need to put mousetraps in my gasoline tank, because I'm fairly
certain that they'll
It's in the archives. Link is at the bottom of this and every other
message. What are we supposed to do, research EVERYTHING for you?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:52 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing
I saw Celera's server farm on Tech TV a few weeks ago, I'd do it for a
tour... MAN that's some horsepower.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 01:22 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: MEC
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Tom Meunier
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
...or maybe she won't create PUBLICALLY ACCESSIBLE
SHARES
]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os
You still are missing the distinction between a file-based scanner and
scanning the database using an Exchange-aware antivirus solution
I'm still seeing a lot of them, and (maybe because of the judicial
organization?) the w32.magistr_whatever_it_is
Who cares, they get tossed in the trash by Norton Antivirus for
Gateways.
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 25,
Uh... I guess Andy's joke flew right over your head, then.
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
Loosen up. Hang loose. I just mean this as a joke, so it must not be
an insult.
[Insert disguised obscenities here]
-Original Message-
From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL
There's no MX record for corus.jnj.com
-Original Message-
From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 09:08 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Emails being bounced back
Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back
Sorry,
.asp
Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P
stands for
Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail
admin)... Jim Schwartz
8-16-01
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:05 PM
The definitive answer:
Test it yourself. You have knowledgeable people telling you not to do it,
and you don't believe them. Pretend you're a professional and test it in
a lab environment.
I've never stuffed my cat into a coffee mug, but I've got strong
indications from previous observations
I'm with Joel. Then leave it in place for future idiocies. I'm
assuming you've applied SP1 per the documentation that you'll find at
www.exinternals.com
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Took him that long to read FAQ 3.24? And still confuse 64k with 64,000?
Well, at least he knew how much 1k is.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2001 01:46 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Could you be MUCH more specific than that, please?How would you be
able to plan for a particular email that doesn't exist yet?
-Original Message-
From: Bury, Sue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2001 05:24 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Um... I think Waterbury, VT, is about 10 miles outside of
Barre/Montpelier. That's a haul from New Haven, even if I-91 is clear.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:28 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Folders
Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders
isnt there a Waterbury CT ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 09:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Huge contact folder
Ask McDonald, Where exactly were you at 9:19AM this morning, and for
how long before that, and who knew?
i.e. was he in the washroom with his $250 Italian leathers poking out
underneath the stall, making noises that indicated extreme abdominal
discomfort... :)
-Original Message-
The Plus Pack from Messageware does this.
http://www.messageware.com/
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, October 22, 2001 09:53 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: OWA and GAL access via shortcut.
Subject: OWA and GAL
It's funny in the same way that the Air Force paying $600 for a toilet
seat is funny.
-Original Message-
From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:38 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: 32KB limit on Server Side Rules
You forgot your rant tag; or more appropriately, the newer but
less-supported peeve. Bad form, old boy.
The answer to the rhetorical question is that it's easier to ask a
techie to implement a technological solution, than it is to ask your
managers to, well, manage. Techies love solving
You could also use a logon banner. machine\logon\logon_banner or some
such thing - I don't remember where it is in POLEDIT, but it's certainly
there. We used to pop up a This is state property and we're watching
you yadda yadda, we'll prosecute you if you commit a crime that they
had to click
Works fine in Exchange 2000, if a little clickety.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 04:36 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: E-mailing to contacts using OWA
Subject: RE: E-mailing to contacts using
my job
I'm not a lawyer, and don't even play one on TV. Please do your own
legal research. My employer would laugh food through their nose at the
suggestion that I knew any law, so there.
/disclaimer
Tom Meunier
Network Administrator
State of Texas
Office of Court Administration
(512) 463-0282
Exchange 5.5 is on NT4 or Win2k? Does the LDAP port listed on your ADC
match the LDAP port on your Exchange 5.5 server? You may need to remap
it - I changed it to 3890 iirc. AD uses port 389 exclusively...
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted
NAV-MSE doesn't hook into the IMC; it is either MAPI and/or AVAPI
1.x[1], or MAPI and/or AVAPI 2.0 if you're using Exchange 2000 and
NAV-MSE 2.5. What SPs have you got on that server? What exact version
of NAV-MSE? Is it part of the NAV Corporate suite? If so, you'll have
NAV for Gateways
You don't move them. You create a replica, let them replicate, then
rehome them, then delete the old replica. Or whatever the
fancy-schmancy terminology is.
I think I just re-created all my DLs. Don't have that many. Sorry.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL
: MAPI Client for Windows 2000
Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000
Who told you I don't believe them?
The status for now is:
No one ,yet, told me 'I have installed it on a test box, and it was
ok/bad'.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
FAQ 5.1
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, October 29, 2001 02:27 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: nimda d??
Subject: RE: nimda d??
Yea. I want that in the FAQ.
Next to the Ed Crowley Server Move, I want
Nor here. Google it first, though; you see all sorts of weird problems
in the newsgroups. Might give you some stuff to double-check before you
dive.
-tom No intitials, but I can spell my own name. :)
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday,
It's FAQ 3.16 if you prefer your FAQ for Exchange 2000,
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec3.htm, or FAQ 3.24 if you prefer
Exchange 5.x at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm. As Don
noted, BAD idea. Use OWA over SSL, or VPN Outlook, or both, if you'd
like a secure
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=13008source=
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 09:01 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Error Message Help
Subject: Error Message Help
Does anybody
Huh, works flawlessly here. I've uninstalled, reinstalled, upgraded,
whatever. I have, however, noticed problems being reported in the
newsgroups and here by people not keeping current.
I consider the product a proper AV solution for my enterprise. Not
knowing how to drive a car doesn't
Cool toy. Factoid is that it takes HFNETCHK switches, so you can check
all your servers from one screen, just insert the parameter -r
[ipaddress]-[ipaddress] and it'll do a whole IP range and report it on
one screen. Thanks for this; I'll be playing with it as an Excel
replacement!
Perhaps they're trying to do a reverse lookup on your mail server's DNS
record, and it's not in your tables?
-Original Message-
From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, November 01, 2001 09:59 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Internet
1 - 100 of 613 matches
Mail list logo