RE: moving/renaming user.

2001-08-13 Thread Tom Meunier
Sounds like his userid and Exchange alias are now different, so he'll need to log into OWA using DOMAIN\userid\alias format. Domainname\JoeUserOld\JoeUser or whatever it is. Huh. Maybe I got that backwards. Maybe it needs to be Domainname\joeuser\joeuserold now. I can't remember. These

RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN.

2001-08-14 Thread Tom Meunier
: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Frame Relay or T1 line+VPN. I'll take the OWA one. :) The only version info I saw in the email was one reference to one Exchange 2000 server. You'd use a frontend-backend scenario

RE: Mailbox Manager Tool

2001-08-15 Thread Tom Meunier
It comes with online documentation. Is there a part of it that isn't self-explanatory? I must be missing some cool features. -Original Message- From: Khin Thuzar Nu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:45 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: blocking internet access (OT)

2001-08-17 Thread Tom Meunier
What OS? How savvy is your kid? You could just hard-code wrong DNS servers, wrong gateway, remove the IP stack, whatever. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 07:07 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation:

RE: blocking internet access (OT)

2001-08-17 Thread Tom Meunier
it on your PC. Rename IE's executable so only you know where to find it. Steve -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: blocking internet access (OT) What OS? How savvy

RE: blocking internet access (OT)

2001-08-17 Thread Tom Meunier
so does we-blocker (www.we-blocker.com). Freeware and very configurable. Worth a look, for the price. -Original Message- From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:42 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: blocking internet access

RE: Code red

2001-08-20 Thread Tom Meunier
If it gets a not found error, it wasn't successful. It'll appear right after the attempt in your logs. -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:37 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Code red Subject:

RE: Wildcard Addressing

2001-08-20 Thread Tom Meunier
Nope, there isn't a box that just receives all mail with misspelled smtp addresses. There was a conversation a month or so ago (on the E2k list perhaps? don't remember couldn't find it real quickly), about whether this violates the letter, or just the spirit, of pertinent RFCs. The best way I

RE: Wildcard Addressing

2001-08-20 Thread Tom Meunier
://www.tiggercam.co.uk - There is no greater waste as a waste of time. - -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 2:36 PM

RE: Undelete command

2001-08-21 Thread Tom Meunier
I crossed a busy street without looking last week, and didn't get hit by a car. (yup, I noticed you put in the crucial YMMV, Tom!) -Original Message- From: Tom Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 01:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Urgent

2001-08-22 Thread Tom Meunier
Try using domain\userid\alias. And try to type out the entire words and include necessary punctuation. when you're asking a question. It borders on unintelligible. Unless your ISP charges you per byte, in wch cs I undrstd n smpthz. Othr thn tht, xpln urslf mor flly. -Original

RE: Urgent

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Meunier
?) may not be this chap's first language? -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2001 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent Try using domain\userid\alias. And try to type out the entire words and include

RE: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please help

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Meunier
The thread from 7.25.2001, titled The Last Few Days... Assault rob, actually. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:39 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Problem after move to Exchange 2000, please

RE: bilateral agreement NDR

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Meunier
I'm gonna guess the recipient bounced it as against its security policies. Kind of a weird message. Initiate an SMTP session by hand, and see where it happens. -Original Message- From: Dumke, Jane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:29 PM Posted To:

RE: Address list problems ...

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Meunier
So when you go into ESM Org Recipients and start right-clicking and looking at security settings, what groups can read, whether the security perms inherit or not, do you have any insights? Pretend it's a file they can't see on an NTFS volume somewhere, troubleshoot just like that. Group

RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Meunier
Two comments, neither of which will immediately solve your problem[1]: 1. You're saying that you have a MAPI client installed on your Exchange server[2]? Generally considered A Bad Idea. 2. Nobody will touch it until you prove that the script isn't causing the problems? It's generally

RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions

2001-08-23 Thread Tom Meunier
Good point, Lori. Yes, I use an antivirus scanner that has a MAPI interface. I don't, however, use it in MAPI scan mode. I use that antivirus API in conjunction with a gateway scanner. The reason I don't use it in MAPI is because I get unspecified mapi error. So now I'm laughing at myself.

RE: secondary domain inbound failing

2001-08-24 Thread Tom Meunier
Oh great, we've found another knowledge gap in my brain. Like I needed more. What on earth is a tail for outbound mail, and how would I enter it as an SMTP address? In general, I mean. I don't use Exchange 5.5 anymore, so maybe they've replaced it in Exchange 2000 with another animal body

RE: CISCO Pix FixUp Protocol

2001-08-25 Thread Tom Meunier
it - the state won't buy me a spare pix ;) ) Tom Meunier Network Administrator State of Texas Office of Court Administration (512) 463-0282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, August 25, 2001 8:42 AM Posted

RE: CISCO Pix FixUp Protocol

2001-08-26 Thread Tom Meunier
- From: Tom Meunier [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 1:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: CISCO Pix FixUp Protocol This has been a continuing sticking point between our Cisco person and me. I insist that he turn it off, and he doesn't like it one bit

RE: Outlook asking password again and again. Plz hurry

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Meunier
I told you that last Wednesday. I'm glad you solved it, though. -Original Message- From: Adil Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:19 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Outlook asking password again and again. Plz hurry Subject: RE:

RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Meunier
...and keep in mind that the multiple copies issue may not be as severe as it seems, at first blush. You do have SIS, after all, so as long as they're not changing it and sticking it back in the store, it's somewhat mitigated. Having said that, one of the banes of my existence is people who

RE: Restore of Exchange 5.5 But Not Mail Account Access

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Meunier
Erik, You didn't resore the directory, did you? You should restore only the IS, and the KCC will create the directory for you. -tom -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:11 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Outlook prompts for User Info

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Meunier
Under the Advanced tab of your Exchange Server properties, in your profile, what's the Logon Network Security set to? Here's the little help doodad they give you: Specifies a password authentication option. To log on to Microsoft Exchange Server with the same network security password that you

RE: Restore of Exchange 5.5 But Not Mail Account Access

2001-08-27 Thread Tom Meunier
: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore of Exchange 5.5 But Not Mail Account Access Erik, You didn't resore the directory, did you? You should restore only the IS, and the KCC will create the directory for you

RE: Plain Text Only

2001-08-28 Thread Tom Meunier
if it is Geocities, which I also hate. http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1236/nomime.html Tom Meunier Network Administrator State of Texas Office of Court Administration (512) 463-0282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1236/nomime.html -Original Message- From: Martin

RE: POP3 client using another user's IMS SMTP address

2001-08-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Because you can't change it in any other major product, either. This is a client-side issue. I can put whatever I want in it, no matter what type of SMTP box I'm bouncing it off, as long as it's open for me to relay through. It's no different from the subject line or the to: line. I can type

RE: User Friendly Exchange List

2001-08-29 Thread Tom Meunier
I respect the sentiment, Larry. Perhaps someone (not me! I'm overworked and far too lazy) ought to write a FAQ along the lines of the [glowing adjective] Andrew S. Baker's [glowing adjective] http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=~Help.TXT from his [glowing adjective] knowledge base. But I

RE: how can I notify through SMTP that a mailbox recieved an item ?

2001-08-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Anthony Sollars' solution given in this thread will work within the parameters you've stated. -Original Message- From: Matthew Kerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 04:47 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: how can I notify through

RE: Server Side Notification Script

2001-08-29 Thread Tom Meunier
You just completely changed the parameters of your question. You said that incoming messages to a mailbox should fire an outgoing SMTP message. Where did public folders get involved? And you didn't say forwarding mail, you said send a preformatted notification message. -Original

RE: Relaying email probelms

2001-08-30 Thread Tom Meunier
I would re-examine your stance on requiring authentication. They're typing in their password anyway, for POP3 retrieval. What's so difficult about clicking the mouse on the box that says SMTP requires auth? -Original Message- From: Mailing List per Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Open-Relay

2001-08-30 Thread Tom Meunier
You can open relaying up by originating IP address. I don't remember where it is in 5.5, because I'm an Admin Of Very Little Brain. I assume that this server connects to you via a fixed IP address, or at least a DHCP range from the ISP that would be able to narrow it down... Is that what

RE: Norton AntiVorus scan on exchange server 5.5

2001-08-30 Thread Tom Meunier
What version? I wouldn't run the file scanner, or NAV for NT, or whatever you call it; but I use NAV for MS Exchange here, and it's worked like a champ. NAV for NT is for file servers and workstations, not for database servers. If you insist on running it, exclude the Exchange directories from

RE: Norton AntiVorus scan on exchange server 5.5

2001-08-30 Thread Tom Meunier
]] Posted At: Thursday, August 30, 2001 03:54 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Norton AntiVorus scan on exchange server 5.5 Subject: RE: Norton AntiVorus scan on exchange server 5.5 It's version 7.01 --Norton AntiVirus engine. --- Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

RE: Mailbox capacity

2001-08-31 Thread Tom Meunier
a store AND a PST) Tom Meunier Network Administrator State of Texas Office of Court Administration (512) 463-0282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 31, 2001 09:49 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Urgent: Exhcange 5.5 No transport Provider Available

2001-08-31 Thread Tom Meunier
://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP $245 will get you back online with PSS. This may be a wise $245. Tom Meunier Network Administrator State of Texas Office of Court Administration (512) 463-0282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jonj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: cannot recieve from HOTMAIL

2001-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Hotmail is not able to find a route to the domain xxx.xxx. I would have problems sending there too; it's not a valid internet domain. If you'd be forthcoming with xxx.xxx, this would go a whole lot faster. -Original Message- From: Venkatna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At:

RE: Mailbox move rates

2001-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Mine was 16gb overnight. Sorry I can't be more specific - I would guess 8 hours or so, but it was back in March and I'm aging quickly now... I wasn't really timing it; I gave myself the whole weekend was pleased at the response. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: DNS or Exchange2K?

2001-09-04 Thread Tom Meunier
Do you have a Cisco Pix? On your telnet to [public ip:25] do you get a 220 and a bunch of *** or a valid 220 banner page indicating the SMTP server, version, time, etc? Bunch of indicates Cisco Mailguard is most likely the problem. Disable it or upgrade it with no fixup

RE: Win2k Server Password recovery!

2001-09-06 Thread Tom Meunier
I hope you've already called PSS, but you want forceful? http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/ I think I'd have security escort that utility out of the building, if it were headed toward a production server. I'd pay PSS. -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: 554 too many hops error

2001-09-07 Thread Tom Meunier
vscan.pacific.net.ph and pob1.pacific.net.ph are playing hot-potato with the email. I'd say you have a misconfigured virus scanner, guessing from the dns name of the machine. -Original Message- From: jojo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, September 07, 2001 09:06 AM

RE: PST, OSTor IS message storage

2001-09-08 Thread Tom Meunier
Oddly enough, there was a FAQ about this appended to the bottom of your message. And now twice, at the bottom of this one. I'll prepend it, too: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxf.htm -Original Message- From: msxlist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday,

RE: PSTUPG19

2001-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
FYI, here's a link I trust a bit more than earthlink.com/~some_guy/H4CKZ/ http://www.msexchange.org/how_to/passwords.htm -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 10, 2001 01:49 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation:

RE: Chaos, evil, and eseutil /d reign!

2001-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
May I suggest, until you upgrade to Enterprise, and if you come out of this with your store and your job... Mailbox manager, (go find out what it is) and start deleting stuff over 30 days old in peoples' deleted items box. Bet you save a bunch of space. I'm making the assumption that mailbox

RE: Chaos, evil, and eseutil /d reign!

2001-09-10 Thread Tom Meunier
-mail: the entire history of the Poor Brazilian Guy Who Have Earned The Mission of Riding The Exchange Server 5.5 On-The-Fly with no Trainning Support Laercio Santos Jr - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail

2001-09-11 Thread Tom Meunier
server for mail No, but it successfully halts mail checking, recieving and sending when installed improperly on mail, relay, antivirus and generally all servers to do with mail or web. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:35 PM

RE: Urgent!

2001-09-11 Thread Tom Meunier
Probably 15 whacko groups are going to claim responsibility before this is done. Please let's not participate in the immediate targetting (and attacks) of the Muslim faithful, or people who have been displaced or displeased by highly complex Middle Eastern politics, as was done in 1993 after two

RE: Urgent!

2001-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
Umm nice. How long until you care enough about your late lamented friend to find out that Mogadishu isn't in Ethiopia? Your geopolitical insights seem to jive well with your geopolitical knowledge. -Original Message- From: Pelfrey, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At:

RE: DISCLAIMER

2001-09-12 Thread Tom Meunier
It's FAQ4.1. That FAQ is available in downloadable PDF format, and should be required reading for anyone who even TOUCHES an exchange box. 4.1 Q: How do I add legalese, footers, or disclaimers to all my messages? A1:http://www.dbsinyc.com/DBSI/exchange A2: MIMESweeper A3: MMS

RE: Begging

2001-09-13 Thread Tom Meunier
I love that number. It always picks up while I'm idiotically twirling my finger in circles, trying to locate the Q on my telephone keypad. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:18 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: FW: [FBC] NY American Red Cross wish list

2001-09-13 Thread Tom Meunier
www.nyredcross.org accepts online donations; it's the local chapter. www.uwnyc.org is the New York City United Way; it also accepts online donations. As Eric said, much more direct. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 13,

RE: OWA and Authentication

2001-09-13 Thread Tom Meunier
Your users are logging in as DOMAINNAME\userid, then password, right? -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:58 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: :-) RE: Internal Anon... Email for Exchange Subject: OWA

RE: Importing name in the AD(ex2000)

2001-09-13 Thread Tom Meunier
And CSVDE. Maybe easier for novices. http://www.swynk.com/friends/policht/Art112100.asp -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:02 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Importing name in the AD(ex2000)

RE: Disable ability to reply

2001-09-14 Thread Tom Meunier
Uh... what the hell is THAT about? Mr. di Nardo ruin one of K-Mart's servers or something? If so, your assessment of his competence is a matter between you him. If not, your judgement of his competence should probably be kept to yourself. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar

RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed

2001-09-16 Thread Tom Meunier
You're wrong. You must get paid a lot to reformat production servers. TS gets reinstalled whenever you add or remove a networking component to Windows 2000 server[1], so you'd be reformatting your server to add Print Services for Unix, because you wanted to create a print queue to a printer down

RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed

2001-09-16 Thread Tom Meunier
. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 14:34 Subject: RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed You're wrong. You must get paid a lot to reformat production servers. TS gets reinstalled

RE: Help Ex2k member and 2 DC's (2nd DC down )

2001-09-16 Thread Tom Meunier
...and if it's a child domain, not even then. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Sunday, September 16, 2001 12:32 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Help Ex2k member and 2 DC's (2nd DC down ) Subject: RE: Help Ex2k member and 2 DC's

RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed

2001-09-17 Thread Tom Meunier
. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 14:34 Subject: RE: Terminal Services installed after E2K installed You're wrong. You must get paid a lot to reformat

RE: New Virus / Worm ??

2001-09-18 Thread Tom Meunier
I wish I didn't know the answer to this one: C:\shared\ -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 03:02 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Virus / Worm ?? Subject: RE: New Virus / Worm ?? What

RE: Urgent , space is full very fast

2001-09-19 Thread Tom Meunier
Sounds like a mail loop. Put limits on your mailboxes. Restrict send at nn megabytes. That will stop it for the moment, if that's what it is, and buy you some time to react. Now go get a good online backup of your server to get rid of all the 5mb log files. (You have a whole bunch of them,

RE: Urgent , space is full very fast

2001-09-19 Thread Tom Meunier
of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Urgent , space is full very fast Sounds like a mail loop. Put limits on your mailboxes. Restrict send

RE: Additional steps to prevent IIS compromise!

2001-09-21 Thread Tom Meunier
Pete, removing the scripts directory is just one of many, many suggestions in the securing IIS whitepaper you'll find at www.microsoft.com/security. They even have a tool to run a default lockdown. Oh, and they've got a thingy that will lock out any request for *.exe, *.cmd, malformed URLs,

RE: # of folders in mailboxes

2001-09-21 Thread Tom Meunier
Mary Lou, You really should have all of it on your Exchange Server. There's a big old huge list of reasons why not, in an appendix to the FAQ. You lose a huge measure of manageability when you let them start keeping PSTs on their desktop, on a file server, in the trunk of their car, in a

RE: today's admin backwards virus

2001-09-22 Thread Tom Meunier
Huh, I've visited it a few times this morning, and it's up now. Maybe he was patching or something? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:57 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: today's admin

RE: MS Easybake Oven

2001-09-24 Thread Tom Meunier
Kuminda's definition of cooking has three components[1] 1. Heating 2. Boiling 3. Mixing [1] If you have to do more than one for the same foodstuff, put the stuff back and find a restaurant. :) -Original Message- From: Kuminda Chandimith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday,

RE: Rules Wizard

2001-09-24 Thread Tom Meunier
Every once in a while, buy a bunch of Krispy Kreme donuts and hide a reference to the fact that the first five people to come ask for them will get half a dozen. The first three people to respond to this email get every Feb 30th off for the rest of the century, paid double salary. Give 'em a

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley asked people to report this info to him. About a month ago, I'd say. I don't know how many people forwarded off-site, and it was never determined how a high or low SIS ratio affected the move rate, but he may have his results in compiled form. My

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
...or maybe she won't create PUBLICALLY ACCESSIBLE SHARES on an Exchange box, perhaps. Or browse the web or read her email from it. You identify your points of possible infection, and you protect them. I don't need to put mousetraps in my gasoline tank, because I'm fairly certain that they'll

RE: MEC

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
It's in the archives. Link is at the bottom of this and every other message. What are we supposed to do, research EVERYTHING for you? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:52 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing

RE: MEC

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
I saw Celera's server farm on Tech TV a few weeks ago, I'd do it for a tour... MAN that's some horsepower. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 01:22 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: MEC

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os ...or maybe she won't create PUBLICALLY ACCESSIBLE SHARES

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
]] On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os You still are missing the distinction between a file-based scanner and scanning the database using an Exchange-aware antivirus solution

RE: Sircam Virus

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
I'm still seeing a lot of them, and (maybe because of the judicial organization?) the w32.magistr_whatever_it_is Who cares, they get tossed in the trash by Norton Antivirus for Gateways. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, September 25,

RE: anti-virus protection for Exchange server os

2001-09-25 Thread Tom Meunier
Uh... I guess Andy's joke flew right over your head, then. http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html Loosen up. Hang loose. I just mean this as a joke, so it must not be an insult. [Insert disguised obscenities here] -Original Message- From: tech [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Emails being bounced back

2001-09-26 Thread Tom Meunier
There's no MX record for corus.jnj.com -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 09:08 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Emails being bounced back Subject: RE: Emails being bounced back Sorry,

RE: Emails being bounced back

2001-09-26 Thread Tom Meunier
.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 1:05 PM

Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000

2001-09-30 Thread Tom Meunier
The definitive answer: Test it yourself. You have knowledgeable people telling you not to do it, and you don't believe them. Pretend you're a professional and test it in a lab environment. I've never stuffed my cat into a coffee mug, but I've got strong indications from previous observations

RE: Deleting/Clearing a Large Message from User Mailboxes: Progra mmatic Solutions?

2001-10-02 Thread Tom Meunier
I'm with Joel. Then leave it in place for future idiocies. I'm assuming you've applied SP1 per the documentation that you'll find at www.exinternals.com -Original Message- From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Firewall and Exchange Ports.

2001-10-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Took him that long to read FAQ 3.24? And still confuse 64k with 64,000? Well, at least he knew how much 1k is. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2001 01:46 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Automatic Deletion

2001-10-18 Thread Tom Meunier
Could you be MUCH more specific than that, please?How would you be able to plan for a particular email that doesn't exist yet? -Original Message- From: Bury, Sue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, October 18, 2001 05:24 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders

2001-10-19 Thread Tom Meunier
Um... I think Waterbury, VT, is about 10 miles outside of Barre/Montpelier. That's a haul from New Haven, even if I-91 is clear. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, October 19, 2001 08:28 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List

RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders

2001-10-19 Thread Tom Meunier
Folders Subject: RE: Huge contact folder in Public Folders isnt there a Waterbury CT ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 09:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Huge contact folder

RE: Investigating a Forged Message

2001-10-19 Thread Tom Meunier
Ask McDonald, Where exactly were you at 9:19AM this morning, and for how long before that, and who knew? i.e. was he in the washroom with his $250 Italian leathers poking out underneath the stall, making noises that indicated extreme abdominal discomfort... :) -Original Message-

RE: OWA and GAL access via shortcut.

2001-10-22 Thread Tom Meunier
The Plus Pack from Messageware does this. http://www.messageware.com/ -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, October 22, 2001 09:53 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA and GAL access via shortcut. Subject: OWA and GAL

RE: 32KB limit on Server Side Rules

2001-10-22 Thread Tom Meunier
It's funny in the same way that the Air Force paying $600 for a toilet seat is funny. -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:38 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: 32KB limit on Server Side Rules

RE: Disclaimer

2001-10-24 Thread Tom Meunier
You forgot your rant tag; or more appropriately, the newer but less-supported peeve. Bad form, old boy. The answer to the rhetorical question is that it's easier to ask a techie to implement a technological solution, than it is to ask your managers to, well, manage. Techies love solving

RE: Disclaimer

2001-10-24 Thread Tom Meunier
You could also use a logon banner. machine\logon\logon_banner or some such thing - I don't remember where it is in POLEDIT, but it's certainly there. We used to pop up a This is state property and we're watching you yadda yadda, we'll prosecute you if you commit a crime that they had to click

RE: E-mailing to contacts using OWA

2001-10-24 Thread Tom Meunier
Works fine in Exchange 2000, if a little clickety. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 04:36 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: E-mailing to contacts using OWA Subject: RE: E-mailing to contacts using

RE: public schools, gov e-mail

2001-10-26 Thread Tom Meunier
my job I'm not a lawyer, and don't even play one on TV. Please do your own legal research. My employer would laugh food through their nose at the suggestion that I knew any law, so there. /disclaimer Tom Meunier Network Administrator State of Texas Office of Court Administration (512) 463-0282

RE: Installing Exchange 2K Problem

2001-10-26 Thread Tom Meunier
Exchange 5.5 is on NT4 or Win2k? Does the LDAP port listed on your ADC match the LDAP port on your Exchange 5.5 server? You may need to remap it - I changed it to 3890 iirc. AD uses port 389 exclusively... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted

RE: Is this a feature?

2001-10-26 Thread Tom Meunier
NAV-MSE doesn't hook into the IMC; it is either MAPI and/or AVAPI 1.x[1], or MAPI and/or AVAPI 2.0 if you're using Exchange 2000 and NAV-MSE 2.5. What SPs have you got on that server? What exact version of NAV-MSE? Is it part of the NAV Corporate suite? If so, you'll have NAV for Gateways

RE: ADC

2001-10-26 Thread Tom Meunier
You don't move them. You create a replica, let them replicate, then rehome them, then delete the old replica. Or whatever the fancy-schmancy terminology is. I think I just re-created all my DLs. Don't have that many. Sorry. -Original Message- From: Tim Nicholls [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: MAPI Client for Windows 2000

2001-10-28 Thread Tom Meunier
: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 Subject: Re: MAPI Client for Windows 2000 Who told you I don't believe them? The status for now is: No one ,yet, told me 'I have installed it on a test box, and it was ok/bad'. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange

RE: nimda d??

2001-10-29 Thread Tom Meunier
FAQ 5.1 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, October 29, 2001 02:27 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: nimda d?? Subject: RE: nimda d?? Yea. I want that in the FAQ. Next to the Ed Crowley Server Move, I want

RE: Exchange 2K in W2K Mixed Mode environment

2001-10-29 Thread Tom Meunier
Nor here. Google it first, though; you see all sorts of weird problems in the newsgroups. Might give you some stuff to double-check before you dive. -tom No intitials, but I can spell my own name. :) -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday,

RE: Accessing Exchange from Outlook 2k through firewall

2001-10-30 Thread Tom Meunier
It's FAQ 3.16 if you prefer your FAQ for Exchange 2000, http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_sec3.htm, or FAQ 3.24 if you prefer Exchange 5.x at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm. As Don noted, BAD idea. Use OWA over SSL, or VPN Outlook, or both, if you'd like a secure

RE: Error Message Help

2001-10-31 Thread Tom Meunier
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=13008source= -Original Message- From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 09:01 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Error Message Help Subject: Error Message Help Does anybody

RE: isinteg/eseutil refresher

2001-10-31 Thread Tom Meunier
Huh, works flawlessly here. I've uninstalled, reinstalled, upgraded, whatever. I have, however, noticed problems being reported in the newsgroups and here by people not keeping current. I consider the product a proper AV solution for my enterprise. Not knowing how to drive a car doesn't

RE: Error Message Help

2001-10-31 Thread Tom Meunier
Cool toy. Factoid is that it takes HFNETCHK switches, so you can check all your servers from one screen, just insert the parameter -r [ipaddress]-[ipaddress] and it'll do a whole IP range and report it on one screen. Thanks for this; I'll be playing with it as an Excel replacement!

RE: Internet mail problem

2001-11-01 Thread Tom Meunier
Perhaps they're trying to do a reverse lookup on your mail server's DNS record, and it's not in your tables? -Original Message- From: Cook, David A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, November 01, 2001 09:59 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Internet

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >