Policing the Police...

2001-12-07 Thread Ward, Stuart
Hi all... I have been put in a situation where I have to monitor activity on my exchange box due to some potential dishonesty by a colleague. Have any of you implemented any kind of logging either by user account or through Exchange itself, and if so, what things should I be looking for and sett

Policing the Police

2001-12-07 Thread Ward, Stuart
Sorry... activity such as permission changes on mailboxes and access to mailboxes when not the owner (aside from system or AV access) Stu _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: h

RE: Policing the Police...

2001-12-07 Thread Ward, Stuart
. Ed Crowley Compaq Computer --- "Ward, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all... > > I have been put in a situation where I have to > monitor activity on my > exchange box due to some potential dishonesty by a > colleague. Have any of > you implemente

RE: URL as a malicius code.

2001-12-18 Thread Ward, Stuart
-Original Message- From: David Florea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: URL as a malicius code. Can't get that link to work..

RE: AV! a full time job?

2001-12-27 Thread Ward, Stuart
Who has the ultimate responsibility for the overall functionality of the network? If it's you, you're the boss - change the passwords and tell them to stick it! -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discuss

Repeating Emails

2001-10-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
Hi all We run an Exchange 5.5 box with SP4 Periodically and without any indication as to the cause we seem to produce multiple emails to the same SMTP recipient - sometimes up to 100!! Has anyone else experienced this? If so, please help as we are unable to track down the root cause. Stu ___

RE: Repeating Emails

2001-10-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
does this happen and is it a different recipient each time or always the same recipient? -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Repeating Emails Hi all We run an Exchange 5.5 box with

RE: Repeating Emails

2001-10-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
: Repeating Emails Stu: Is the message being re-delivered to an internal or external user? If external, how is your mail relayed: direct to the firewall or through another relay server? What kind of firewall/what kind of relay? Regards, Louise -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart

RE: Offline Folders Unavailable

2001-11-21 Thread Ward, Stuart
Recreate profile and ensure 'user travels' is selected -Original Message- From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline Folders Unavailable Hi All, I have a user who converted to Exchange and

Slow open of messages with attachments

2002-01-31 Thread Ward, Stuart
All We are experiencing some issues with opening emails containing attachments with the size of attachment not appearing to make a difference. When a user clicks on the message to open it or even preview it on machines that we allow preview pane, it can take 5 seconds or more to actually bring u

RE: Dead Letter Mailbox

2002-04-02 Thread Ward, Stuart
Appropriate NDR's forward to Admin Mailbox -Original Message- From: Hawkins, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dead Letter Mailbox Hi there Does anyone know of a solution for handling incoming messages that are go

RE: Mailing Lists

2002-10-24 Thread Ward, Stuart
Do what you're doing but create a hidden distribution list with no recipients with alias as appropriate. Add the 'Billings Update' SMTP address to it. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:mustafa.ibrahim@;broadcastingdata.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:13 PM To: Exc

Win32.chiracdance.trojan

2002-11-14 Thread Ward, Stuart
Does anyone have any information on the following virus: Win32.chiracdance.trojan None of the Antivirus vendors appear to have anything other than CA which only show detection for their product but no information. I have searched Google and am continuing to look around TIA for any help. Stu -

RE: Multiple messages

2002-05-29 Thread Ward, Stuart
yup... -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple messages Anyone else getting the same group of messages sent to them over and over and over again? This is the only list I seem to b

RE: Multiple messages

2002-05-29 Thread Ward, Stuart
yup... -Original Message- From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Multiple messages Anyone else getting the same group of messages sent to them over and over and over again? This is the only list I seem to b

RE: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server

2002-05-31 Thread Ward, Stuart
We had a similar issue last year with our Dell box not recreating the array correctly after corruption/death of hard disk - all sorts of issues with firmware level etc. Had to kill it, recreate and restore...fine since. Stu Senegal for the Cup... :o) -Original Message- From: Mellott,

RE: Where is everyone?

2002-06-03 Thread Ward, Stuart
I think Italy... England messed up their chances over the weekend... Stu ExPat Brit -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights...

RE: Outlook 97 Notification

2002-06-05 Thread Ward, Stuart
Surely 'authorize' is the variant and the true English spelling is 'authorise' Stu -Original Message- From: Setmajer, Jerzy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook 97 Notification Boy this list is educational. Now

RE: Outlook 97 Notification

2002-06-05 Thread Ward, Stuart
entry found for authorise. British variant of AUTHORIZE" As opposed to "authorize" - which does not refer to "authorise" at all. Must be some sort of British slang or something :=) Jerzy -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4

2002-06-05 Thread Ward, Stuart
Can't seem to get into the archives right now... How do I go about restricting outbound email from a user to only particular internal recipients? I see how to stop the receipt of messages unless from specifics, but not how to restrict outbound. Thanks __

RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4

2002-06-05 Thread Ward, Stuart
sions Subject: RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4 create custom recipient and set restrictions on it -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4 Can't seem to ge

RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4

2002-06-05 Thread Ward, Stuart
se. Jerzy -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Restriction Ex5.5 sp4 I don't believe that achieves what I am after. I want to set up an internal user to only be able to

RE: A mistake was made...

2002-06-05 Thread Ward, Stuart
exmerge -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A mistake was made... Outlook 98. exchange 5.5 sp4 User sent out an eMAIL to a large distribution list by mistake. The Recall Message act

RE: Bandwidth Help

2003-05-29 Thread Ward, Stuart
Nimda comes to mind... -Original Message- From: Jason E. Sommers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Bandwidth Help Group, I am having some problem with my Exchange server using way too much bandwidth. I have been using Exchan

RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Ward, Stuart
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 OK everyone here it is...the fix. As you veteran networkers probably detected right of the bat is...it

RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1

2003-06-20 Thread Ward, Stuart
Fat fingers I think... -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE: RE: Error on inbound mail 550 5.7.1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:40

RE: DL for internal use only

2003-06-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- F

RE: DL for internal use only

2003-06-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
ginal Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mai

RE: W2KSP4 v. Exchange

2003-07-09 Thread Ward, Stuart
reapply exchange sp? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2KSP4 v. Exchange I put SP4 on my W2K/E2K Exchange box last night, and it seems to have broken some functionality, remote u

RE: I've been searching Usenet and MSTechnet with no reference to this problem

2003-07-10 Thread Ward, Stuart
screen resolution... -Original Message- From: REED, JOHN D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I've been searching Usenet and MSTechnet with no reference to this problem I'm new to the list, so I apologize if this problem ha

RE: attachement overload

2003-07-11 Thread Ward, Stuart
Doesn't work like that...SIS Stu -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: attachement overload Running Exchange 5.5. We have a situation in our company where people need to mail files to each

RE: GAL Question

2003-07-24 Thread Ward, Stuart
Exchange - 'advanced' tab - 'hide from address book' -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: GAL Question I want to create permissions on a calendar. I want to create a group instea

Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation

2003-08-01 Thread Ward, Stuart
Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is 'shift-deleted' from inbox that there is no way to recover said item. The item does not appear as available to recover under 'tools'->'recover deleted items'. I have no backups whilst the item existed. Thanks Stu Confidentiality N

RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation

2003-08-01 Thread Ward, Stuart
items from any folder. It is retrospective. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation Ex5.5 I have this set but want to be sure that if an item is &

RE: SPAM filtering on a budget

2003-10-28 Thread Ward, Stuart
Recently done exactly that with same previous exposure to Linux as you Matt. Works well, but still tweaking... All config information gathered from web - Linux downloaded from RedHat. Stu -Original Message- From: Arlo Clizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:

RE: lost in relay problem

2003-11-19 Thread Ward, Stuart
Do you accept email for "12.10.133.30"? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: lost in relay problem exch 5.5 w/sp4 First let me say i am sorry, cause i keep comming back and aski

Exchange 2003 test scenario

2003-11-20 Thread Ward, Stuart
E2k3 W2k3 DC AD XPClient Outlook2003 Hi all Trying to test all this out, and running into problem when trying to set up mail under outlook. When trying to resolve mailbox, receive error: Unable to resolve name; Bookmark is invalid Any ideas? Thanks Stu Steps setup W2k3 DC and DNS on same

RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk

2003-12-04 Thread Ward, Stuart
Keep the old drives in the system if you can and put the logs on them through the same process. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Upgrading Exchange Server Hard Disk Do you

RE: site connector question.

2004-01-06 Thread Ward, Stuart
ah the wonders of technology... apologies for the resend - was rejected the first time: remove the Directory Replication Connector, then the site connector -Original Message- From: Vas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: sit

RE: Outlook 2003 - Bookmark Not Valid

2004-01-08 Thread Ward, Stuart
I have the same problem using 2003 Server, 2003 Exchange but with no 5.5's in the mix. Does not appear to have anything to do with Outlook version - tried 2000 and 2003. I'm using XP as my client machine. I have the above plus a DC in a test environment and posted the info a while back. Unfort

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Ward, Stuart
Why would it need to? -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ScanMail missing tricks? No problems here with 3.81 - one thing I wish it did do was to scan attachments blocked by extention

RE: ScanMail missing tricks?

2003-06-06 Thread Ward, Stuart
ay, but that's just how I'd like it to work - in fairness with 3.81 they're most of the way there with the integrated quarantine manager section. regards paul - Original Message - From: "Ward, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" &

netsvc to stop SA

2002-07-23 Thread Ward, Stuart
All Ex5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6 Pointers to relevant FAQ's appreciated - can't seem to find any What am I missing? I am trying to use netsvc to stop Exchange services from a remote NT4 server. I can stop some but not all, whether I try to shutdown the services in order or use just MSExchangeSA. syntax

RE: netsvc to stop SA

2002-07-24 Thread Ward, Stuart
July 23, 2002 7:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: netsvc to stop SA How is it failing? Any error messages? DO you have the necessary rights? -Original Message----- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ne