RE: Bindback on Exch2k
Cool. I just hate checking the event viewer from day to day and seeing those errors. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Bindback on Exch2k I've had to deal with that issue a few times in Exchange 5.5 for customers. (Easy fix and a happy customer, what could be better?) In Exchange 2000 (native site) it's not really an issue I don't think since the default communication protocol is SMTP. [1] [1] Course RPC is still required for mailbox moves. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm > -Original Message- > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Bindback on Exch2k > > > > This is more of a curiosity then anything. We have a > exchange site where the registered SMTP server is multihomed across 2 > subnets, but the mailbox servers are all on the same subnet. So this > of course creates a flury of bindback errors, but these errors are > erroneous. Exchange 5.5 and NT4/2k > > Would this still be a issue with Exchange 2k? Is there a way to tell > it not to attempt a bindback over the other subnet? Maybe something > like a routing table for the MTA, just curious. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bindback on Exch2k
I've had to deal with that issue a few times in Exchange 5.5 for customers. (Easy fix and a happy customer, what could be better?) In Exchange 2000 (native site) it's not really an issue I don't think since the default communication protocol is SMTP. [1] [1] Course RPC is still required for mailbox moves. -- Chris Scharff The Mail Resource Center http://www.Mail-Resources.com The Home Page for Mail Administrators. Software pick of the month (Extended Reminders): http://www.slovaktech.com/extendedreminders.htm Exchange FAQs: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm > -Original Message- > From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Bindback on Exch2k > > > > This is more of a curiosity then anything. We have a > exchange site where the registered SMTP server is multihomed > across 2 subnets, but the mailbox servers are all on the same > subnet. So this of course creates a flury of bindback > errors, but these errors are erroneous. Exchange 5.5 and NT4/2k > > Would this still be a issue with Exchange 2k? Is there a way > to tell it not to attempt a bindback over the other subnet? > Maybe something like a routing table for the MTA, just curious. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bindback on Exch2k
This is more of a curiosity then anything. We have a exchange site where the registered SMTP server is multihomed across 2 subnets, but the mailbox servers are all on the same subnet. So this of course creates a flury of bindback errors, but these errors are erroneous. Exchange 5.5 and NT4/2k Would this still be a issue with Exchange 2k? Is there a way to tell it not to attempt a bindback over the other subnet? Maybe something like a routing table for the MTA, just curious. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
