Re: new mail notification (FIX)

2002-01-08 Thread John Q
Hey Chris, Remember when I wrote to you about an issue that I had, and you diagnosed it as a UDP problem over a firewall, and gave me an article about new mail notification? Well I finally got the Q article. Q264035 Thanks for all your help, you al are a GREAT resource -John Q - Original

RE: New mail notification

2001-12-27 Thread Chris Scharff
Multiple NICs in the Exchange box? Are you sniffing for the packets somewhere where you can definitively say the Exchange server is not sending the packets? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! -Original Message- From:

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Andy David
The old standby: http://www.mail-resources.com/koans/51899.htm -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification This has been discussed ad nauseum

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Tom Meunier
Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of nauseum is? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:39 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: New Mail Notification Subject: RE: New Mail Notification

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Andy David
I think its Nixon -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural of nauseum is? -Original Message- From

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Bueffel, Scott M - CNF
Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Will that koan tell Ben, Liz and me what the plural

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Jerry Conway
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 10:23:53 -0800 Well, first I should have spelled it correctly: ad nauseam -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Roger Seielstad
- From: Jerry Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Thanks for the help - especially the Latin lesson. But, since there had been no changes to the router, I decided to test by moving one

RE: New Mail Notification

2001-11-16 Thread Chris Scharff
Could be nic as well. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Mail Notification Still the router. It has an ACL that only permits UDP from the current server's IP

Re: New mail notification port(s)

2001-08-15 Thread Daniel Chenault
but what's coming back is just some random port 1024. - Original Message - From: missy koslosky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:31 PM Subject: Re: New mail notification port(s) Lemme guess... You work for an ASP, or a company

Re: New mail notification port(s)

2001-08-15 Thread Daniel Chenault
Exchange uses UDP for new mail notifications which most routers have blocked by default. (psst: read the FAQ) - Original Message - From: Kevin Derby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:58 PM Subject: Re: New mail notification