So what don't you understand?
The To: address was spoofed and you were added to the Bcc: section, so
your address won't show up in the headers. If you take a look at the NDRs
in your Admin mailbox, you will see an NDR for the address indicated below.
It's spam, pure and simple...delete it or
The To: field showing in the headers is not necessarily the recipient in the
envelope, i.e., the RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] command. Look carefully at spam
you receive. Often you won't even show up in the To: field.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world
Will read them and try and understand them! It wasn't from a spammer
tho but from someone who wants us to sponsor them (we sell skateboards).
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 17:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange
I'm sure I read somewhere about some explot/vuln that involved DAV (which I
noticed in the headers) - maybe that has something to do with it?
regards,
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Read and understand RFC 821 and 822, and their successors 2821 and 2822, and
you'll understand a lot about how spammers ply their trade.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Check and see if the DL is listed as a delegate.
ToolsOptionsdelegates. Just remove it and you should be OK.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Field
Posted At: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:51 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Thanks Jeff - that worked a treat.
(Why is it always the simple things that get overlooked?)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 October 2003 10:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Calendar Behaviour
Check and see
Does the DC that goes down also a Global?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: strange problems
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:37:53 -0400
Hi all.
We are having some interesting problems with
What does DSAccess (Directory Access tab in the Server properties in
Exchange System Manager) say?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange problems
Does the DC that goes down also a Global?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
) and NetBIOS
etc...
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange problems
Not sure about the DC in the other site. It is currently down, can't get to
it to check.
The DC in the same site
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange problems
What does DSAccess (Directory Access tab in the Server properties in
Exchange System Manager
thousand
messages in one store alone) points to something more fundamental.
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Damn Glenn! That is some serious BAS(tm) you got there!
Have you tried disabling the AV
, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
It wasn't a premier article. I had pulled up the article when I sent
the e-mail but now I can't find it either. It's not even on the list
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Don.
BAS ?
Anyhoo...
Disabling the AV software is certainly something that we have considered,
however with the current raft of virii going around, its fairly low on the
list, and other servers running exactly
to something more fundamental.
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
It wasn't a premier article. I had pulled up
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet.
G.
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: Strange
Damn Glenn! That is some serious BAS(tm) you got there!
Have you tried disabling the AV software for a start? Have you considered
SP3 for Exchange? Are you aware you are vulnerable to MSBlaster running W2k
SP2?
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Check out Q article Q818830
We applied the single instance store hotfix before it was part of the
Sept hotfix rollup. When we ran isinteg we had many mailboxes jump in
size.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett
Sent:
Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet.
G.
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Check out Q article
Sounds like someone has enabled directory browsing on the Exch virtual
directory.
- Original Message -
From: Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:43 AM
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all.
Suddenly my OWA stopped
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system
recently?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all.
16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system
recently?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:51 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour
Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Sorry, I missed that one...
Exchange 2000 SP3 + Post_SP3_Rollup, Windows 2000 SP4.
Changes made recently:
- Changed registry value
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Well, look in Norton's Virus Filter and see if they setup a limit on
message size.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u
-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
Sorry, I am trying to troubleshoot a problem that I have very little
knowledge in so if I appear to be a bit slow please forgive me
Its not the attachment per se that's too big. Its that it is causing the
mailbox to go over its size limit.
-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
The original message
-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can
find no settings for limiting the size of e-mail.
-Original Message-
From
It means that the mail relay clientmail2.amicus.com either A) doesn't like
you or 2) is horribly isconfigured by someone who shouldn't be touching
production mail systems.
I'd vote for A personally, but I could see 2 as a valid option too..
Amicus is our external relay. They cannot like us since we pay them.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It means that the mail relay clientmail2.amicus.com either A) doesn't
like you or
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Please post the complete NDR
-Original Message-
From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:41
Anyways, I figured it out. He was forwarding a yahoo email
message(html) and it had an embedded GIF image on it that may be acting
as a beacon.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 1:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
It means
The SMTP Virtual Servers don't have any limits either?
There are three places for message size limits
- Org-level under Global Settings/Message Delivery
- User-level in the user properties
- SMTP in the virtual SMTP server settings
You have 12 GB of disk space left, but is that on the partition
Please post the complete NDR
-Original Message-
From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Exchange
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified the
I think someone needs a nap.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange
of the world which is placing its limits on the mail?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Strange Exchange
Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded
to
the archives where some of my coworkers have done that for me in the past.
From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:12:49 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
I think
But the mailbox has no limits on either the individual or the default.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Its not the attachment per se that's
The disk has 12gig left on it so I don't think that is the problem.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Could it be that the someone is sending
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
I think someone needs a nap.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key
School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange
One of those devices is running low on disk space?
-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can
find
Could it be that the someone is sending a file that would take up all
the rest of the disk space you have reserved for Exchange?
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded to, this error is
not being generated by Exchange. It is being generated by whatever is
listening at your default gateway. Your mx record may be labeled
exchange.satake-usa.com, but whatever is listening isn't Exchange.
nslookup
Default
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can find
no settings for limiting the size of e-mail.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange
Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
The SMTP Virtual Servers don't have any limits either?
There are three places for message size limits
- Org-level under Global Settings/Message Delivery
- User-level in the user properties
- SMTP in the virtual SMTP server settings
You have 12 GB of disk
, 2003 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file?
On 07/25/03 14:39, Steve Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
OK, Thanks Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE
: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
Are you sure she's not just deleting her Inbox folder? Q215604.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis
First off, if doesn't sound like an Exchange issue...it sounds like an
Outlook settings issue.
Second, have you checked User A's account for any delegates? Are there any
other people that have full User priveleges on this mailbox? Have you
checked the Outlook rules or the Tools/Options/E-mail
Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file?
On 07/25/03 14:39, Steve Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her User
A) calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the
scenario:
1) User A sends
Yes, it worked for the first few weeks, and then for no reason I could
discern, it stopped. Both servers are in the same site. The behavior is
consistent on both; neither will authenticate each other's users, but they
authenticate their own with no problems at all. There is nothing logged
in
Did it ever work? Are both servers in the same site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm having an issue with my OWA authentications (kind of like a feature
Really? I'd just delete their account from the network if it was
internal email, or I'd block their whole domain if it was external. We
have rules here against that kind of abuse.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:32
To: Exchange
David,
So I take it this rule would be set on something like a sender or the importance set
on an email?
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
after the email is
sent?
I am beginning to believe my boss is a spammer.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Have the boss just set the reminder flag for Follow up
Just tell him no.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange
I suggested it first :) in my Use the flag message
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I think this is the best option thus far.
Showed it to him and he seems
]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Just tell him no.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
A mailbomber? Sounds like an excellent way to get everyone to hate your
company.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked
There may be something like this, but I will tell you this. If someone did
that to me I would just set up a rule to permanently delete all of their
messages.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, June
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send
Tell your boss it's a great way to get blacklisted.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me.
-Original Message
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this
Lol. Good answer Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.
- Original
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Lol. Good answer Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5
I am loving this.
I think I will put together a nice document for him.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Then tell him you will send him pages every 2
the sender is the person that would set the
reminder intervals.
confused?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount
Hells Bells.
Sign them all up for AOL.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns
Just let him know that you'll probably be blacklisted if he goes forward
with this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright
the reminder
intervals.
confused?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go
reminders.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange
-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I envision a solution like this:
Boss
.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith
Use the flag
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
read minds right?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.
The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was explained
Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why
://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.
Like if the owner emailed to my boss
If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
: Strange Question
If the explanation is correct - why not a rule that pops a dialog box on
the desktop informing of the important email?
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange
: RE: Strange Question
All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he
want this so I can give him what he wants. Will pry further.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange
Wasting...damn spell checker :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said
Wasting...damn spell checker :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Hummert
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Tell him you asked an exchange list. They said
You have any opening there? This sounds like the kind of boss I would
*love* to work for. :-)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I
PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:48:44 -0700
You have any opening there? This sounds like the kind of boss I would
*love* to work for. :-)
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
All of these are great points but I guess it comes back to why does he want
this so I can give him what he wants.
Will pry further.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton
I did it about a year ago but my backups run with NTBackup. AD was already
in place and not the problem. Q224977 was a great help.
Doris
-Original Message-
From: Ted Mosher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 4:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Exchange
Which Jet Errors? There are a number of them.
On 3/29/03 18:55, Ted Mosher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange question for anyone who may have tried this...
Can you restore an Exchange 5.5 server that was backed up with Backup
Exec with the Exchange Option from an NT4.0 server to a copy of
The error is Jett_errFileAccessDenied when I run ISINTEG -PATCH
Does that help?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Question
Which Jet Errors
: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Question
Which Jet Errors? There are a number of them.
On 3/29/03 18:55, Ted Mosher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange question
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Question
I've done a restore of an Exch 5.5 DB from NT4 to a differnt Win2K box,
but never after AD was in place... Didn't have any real trouble with it...
Don't think AD would be too much of a problem though since Exch 5.5 isn't AD
aware and should
Do an offline defragmentation with eseutil and see then if you can start the store.
Exchange doesnt like restorations to different SP or O/S levels.
-- Original Message --
From: Ted Mosher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
Sent: Sun 3/30/2003 10:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Strange Exchange 5.5 Windows 2000 Question
Do an offline defragmentation with eseutil and see then if you can start the
store.
Exchange doesnt like restorations
for Bill East replying to your post, I wouldn't have known this thread
exists.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange 550 error
Actually the name optonline.net is misleading
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange 550 error
It means exactly what it says (and 550 isn't terribly generic).
Domain.com is not a local host on the server you connected
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
