MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Barry Kuske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Fw: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 5.5 Strange Behavior
My boss currently has over 230 MB worth
Yes it appears that the Exchange Cache Mode was what was causing the
problem. I turned it off and all appears to be working well now.
Is this just an issue between Outlook 2003 and Exchange 5.5? I would like
to have this feature enabled because it really does make the end user
experience pretty
Not sure, but my guestimate is that this is how it would work with any
version of Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Kuske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 5:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2003 and Exchange 5.5 Strange Behavior
Yes
My boss currently has over 230 MB worth of Mail in his mailbox. He has
asked me to bump it to 250 MB in the Private Info. Store Limits because he
will be on vacation. I have done that but he is still getting bounced at
230 MB. This was working prior to the upgrade to Outlook 2003. Has anyone
it or block it or both.
-Original Message-
From: NPARRAY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Delivery Method
Hello All,
I received a mail item in my inbox this morning where the recipient
is set to another user
from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NPARRAY
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Delivery Method
Hello All,
I received a mail item in my inbox this morning
Hello All,
I received a mail item in my inbox this morning where the recipient
is set to another user. This is an account that had been deleted about two
years ago from the system. Since then the system had crashed and had to be
restored. The mail itself is spam but my major concern about
Will read them and try and understand them! It wasn't from a spammer
tho but from someone who wants us to sponsor them (we sell skateboards).
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 17:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange
Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know
why it appeared the way it did.
Basically, someone sent an email from a Hotmail address yet the 'from'
field did not display the hotmail address, but an address that looked as
tho it was from our network. Now I know that
Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 November 2003 13:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: strange headers
Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't
quite know
why it appeared the way it did.
Basically, someone sent an email from
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: strange headers
Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know why
it appeared the way it did.
Basically, someone sent an email from
Hi All,
Hopefully, someone has seen this before and there is a simple fix
I'm using EX5.5
One of my users decided to give a Distribution List 'Editor' permissions to
his calendar.
When the next person sent him a meeting invite, it went to both him and the
DL.
He then removed the permissions,
Conversation: Strange Calendar Behaviour
Subject: Strange Calendar Behaviour
Hi All,
Hopefully, someone has seen this before and there is a simple fix
I'm using EX5.5
One of my users decided to give a Distribution List 'Editor' permissions
to
his calendar.
When the next person sent him
Thanks Jeff - that worked a treat.
(Why is it always the simple things that get overlooked?)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 October 2003 10:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Calendar Behaviour
Check and see
Hi all.
We are having some interesting problems with one of our Exchange 2000
SP3 cluster.
I wonder is anyone here has seen something like this.
It seems that whenever a DC *in another AD site* goes offline, this
particular Exchange server starts acting up: users can't connect to the
server
Does the DC that goes down also a Global?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: strange problems
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:37:53 -0400
Hi all.
We are having some interesting problems
Of Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: strange problems
Hi all.
We are having some interesting problems with one of our Exchange 2000
SP3 cluster.
I wonder is anyone here has seen something like this.
It seems that whenever a DC
Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: strange problems
Does the DC that goes down also a Global?
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
) and NetBIOS
etc...
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 14:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange problems
Not sure about the DC in the other site. It is currently down, can't get to
it to check.
The DC in the same site
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: strange problems
What does DSAccess (Directory Access tab in the Server properties in
Exchange System Manager
: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Glenn,
I have seen this exact issue as well and the SIS hotfix does resolve it
(after applying it and then running ISINTEG on each DB). When you run
ISINTEG without the fix it will temporarily resolve the discrepancy
between the real mailbox size and what
.
- Original Message -
From: Ely, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Damn Glenn! That is some serious BAS(tm) you got there!
Have you tried disabling the AV
, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
It wasn't a premier article. I had pulled up the article when I sent
the e-mail but now I can't find it either. It's not even on the list
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Don.
BAS ?
Anyhoo...
Disabling the AV software is certainly something that we have considered,
however with the current raft of virii going around, its fairly low on the
list, and other servers running exactly
to something more fundamental.
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:06 AM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
It wasn't a premier article. I had pulled up
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet.
G.
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: Strange
: Sunday, September 07, 2003 12:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
All,
Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user mailboxes,
such as users being denied access to folders in their mailboxes, rules
disappearing etc. After running
: Saturday, September 06, 2003 9:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
All,
Recently we have been having some strange behaviours with user
mailboxes, such as users being denied access to folders in their
mailboxes, rules disappearing etc. After running ISINTEG
Is that a premier only article ? cant seem to find it on technet.
G.
- Original Message -
From: Kelley, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 6:34 PM
Subject: RE: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG
Check out Q article
Hi all.
Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0
SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for
each of my organisation users.
Any idea?
_
List posting FAQ:
:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all.
Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0
SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for
each of my organisation users.
Any idea
Sounds like someone has enabled directory browsing on the Exch virtual
directory.
- Original Message -
From: Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:43 AM
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all.
Suddenly my OWA stopped
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system
recently?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour
Subject: Strange OWA behaviour
Hi all
16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Exchange version? Service pack? OS? Service pack? Changes made to system
recently?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:44 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:51 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Strange OWA behaviour
Subject: RE: Strange OWA behaviour
Sorry, I missed that one...
Exchange 2000 SP3 + Post_SP3_Rollup, Windows 2000 SP4.
Changes made recently:
- Changed registry value
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Well, look in Norton's Virus Filter and see if they setup a limit on
message size.
Bob Sadler
City of Leawood, KS, USA
WAN/Internet Specialist
913-339-6700 x194
Get a Life! Get TWO! Play Second Life!
http://secondlife.com/ss/?u
-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
Sorry, I am trying to troubleshoot a problem that I have very little
knowledge in so if I appear to be a bit slow please forgive me
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per
messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box has
no limits that could override the defaults. I do not know when this
started
Its not the attachment per se that's too big. Its that it is causing the
mailbox to go over its size limit.
-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
The original message
-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can
find no settings for limiting the size of e-mail.
-Original Message-
From
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means? Been looking
it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted here message
means. This was generated by our external
You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance,
contact your system administrator
..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know
.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what it means?
Been looking
it up but I can't find what the web bugs not accepted
-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Please post the complete NDR
-Original Message-
From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:41
..
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange NDR
We got this strange NDR. Does anyone know what
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Exchange
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified the system default has no limits on a per
messages or over all on storage. I have also verified my personal box
has
no limits that could override
Please post the complete NDR
-Original Message-
From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 8:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Exchange
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified
I think someone needs a nap.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange
of the world which is placing its limits on the mail?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Re: Strange Exchange
Again, as per the last message you posted and I responded
to
the archives where some of my coworkers have done that for me in the past.
From: Dickenson, Steven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:12:49 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
I think
But the mailbox has no limits on either the individual or the default.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Its not the attachment per se that's
The disk has 12gig left on it so I don't think that is the problem.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
Could it be that the someone is sending
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
I think someone needs a nap.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key
School, Annapolis Maryland
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:34 PM
To: Exchange
One of those devices is running low on disk space?
-Original Message-
From: Bruess, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Exchange
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can
find
=b4ebbfdd6af98a027fa7e89a86c55a68
-Original Message-
From: Don Bruess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Exchange
I am having a problem with exchange sending NDR 552 to people sending
large files. I have verified the system default
guesses and actually applies some kind of methodology to
troubleshooting.
From: Don Bruess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:41:17 -0700
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Strange Exchange
I am having a problem
Yes to virus filter. We use Norton, we also have a file wall but I can find
no settings for limiting the size of e-mail.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange
Discussions
Subject:RE: Strange Exchange
The SMTP Virtual Servers don't have any limits either?
There are three places for message size limits
- Org-level under Global Settings/Message Delivery
- User-level in the user properties
- SMTP in the virtual SMTP server settings
You have 12 GB of disk
Please help!
We have a strange relay problem, Exchange 2000 SP3 with Post-SP3 rollup,
and we are hosting multiple domain in the Exchange server.
We have setup relaying as stated everywhere, we allow only computers to
send from internal network or have authenticated, and also selected all
three
, 2003 3:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file?
On 07/25/03 14:39, Steve Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's
Hello all, I have a bizarre OWA 5.5 SP4 issue regarding hard deletes from
the Inbox. A user that uses OWA 5.5 exclusively marks items for deletion
from the Inbox, then selects the Delete Marked Items button. These items
will be moved to her Deleted Items folder. When she does this, though the
Of Lockmer, Amy
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
Hello all, I have a bizarre OWA 5.5 SP4 issue regarding hard deletes from
the Inbox. A user that uses OWA 5.5 exclusively marks items for deletion
from the Inbox, then selects the Delete Marked Items
Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
OK, Thanks Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
If you're on the latest service pack and can reproduce that, I would call
Microsoft PSS.
Ed Crowley MCSE
: Dickenson, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange OWA 5.5 issue
Are you sure she's not just deleting her Inbox folder? Q215604.
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
The Key School, Annapolis
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her User
A) calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the
scenario:
1) User A sends invitation to User B for a meeting.
2) User B accepts invitation.
3) A short while later (the time varies), User A will receive
Settings for either of
these groups of people ?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one
Does the recipient have mail delivery set to a PST file?
On 07/25/03 14:39, Steve Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are having a strange problem with one user's (we'll call her User
A) calendar and specifically with meeting requests. Here is the
scenario:
1) User A sends
Yes, it worked for the first few weeks, and then for no reason I could
discern, it stopped. Both servers are in the same site. The behavior is
consistent on both; neither will authenticate each other's users, but they
authenticate their own with no problems at all. There is nothing logged
in
I'm having an issue with my OWA authentications (kind of like a
feature in a product). I have two Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers, one running
on WNT 4.0 SP6a, one running on W2K SP3. Both have all the Exchange post
SP-4 critical updates and hotfixes installed. Both are running OWA right
now, because
Did it ever work? Are both servers in the same site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm having an issue with my OWA authentications (kind of like a feature
: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send
someone an
email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
until they respond
David,
So I take it this rule would be set on something like a sender or the importance set
on an email?
-Original Message-
From: David J. Culliton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
after the email is
sent?
I am beginning to believe my boss is a spammer.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Have the boss just set the reminder flag for Follow up
Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email,
it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
until they respond to you?
He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about
I suggested it first :) in my Use the flag message
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 9:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I think this is the best option thus far.
Showed it to him and he seems
]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Just tell him no.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an email, it will
resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
until they respond to you?
He has not told me why he wants this and I did have the discussion about the behavoral
issues etc.
Avi
A mailbomber? Sounds like an excellent way to get everyone to hate your
company.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked
11, 2003 10:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send someone an
email, it will resend the email let's say every 20 minutes
until they respond to you?
He has not told me why
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2003 16:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning.
Is there any type of program or something that if you send
Tell your boss it's a great way to get blacklisted.
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Sounds like a mail spamming question to me.
-Original Message
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:22 AM
Subject: Strange Question
My boss asked me this morning
Lol. Good answer Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5 minutes until you get
answer.
- Original
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Lol. Good answer Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Question
Tell your boss you will call him on the phone every 5
I am loving this.
I think I will put together a nice document for him.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Steck, Herb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Then tell him you will send him pages every 2
the sender is the person that would set the
reminder intervals.
confused?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount
Hells Bells.
Sign them all up for AOL.
- Original Message -
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns
Just let him know that you'll probably be blacklisted if he goes forward
with this.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright
the reminder
intervals.
confused?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go to mount Splashmore?
Can we go
reminders.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange
-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I envision a solution like this:
Boss
.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
What's going to stop them from right clicking on the message - Junk
E-mail - Add to Junk Senders?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith
Use the flag
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
Alright...
That didn't go over so well.
He is sticking to his guns and is throwing this into the mix.
2
read minds right?
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
As with many things, it all comes back to Ed C.'s quote.
The bigger question for Avi to pose to his boss
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why not just call?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Avi
Smith-Rapaport
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was explained
Thanks, but for whatever reason this is what he is on now.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
If it's so urgent why is he sending it via e-mail. Why
://www.hawaiilawyer.com
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Question
I was explained that it is more for urgent email from certain people.
Like if the owner emailed to my boss
1 - 100 of 315 matches
Mail list logo
