Title: Message
Hi,
may I have the article no, if possible?
thanks!
-Original Message-From: Lathrum Matt-P55173
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 2002119
9:37To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
Be careful - Active/Active
clustering with
What you're seeing here is known as a hard fault. Basically, Ex 5.5 SP2
saw the introduction of the retry logic - ESE will attempt to read the
data 16 times before deducing that you've a hard fault, e.g. the data on
the disk is wrong.
Do what has already been mentioned on this list - move the
Has anyone got the mail migration wizard for Exchange 5.5 to run on Windows
2000? Is there a new version?
Kevin
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
I am using the Exmerge utility to move mail from one exchange server to
another. Look on the Exchange 5.5 or 2000 resource kit cd.
JL
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:
My clients are moving from GroupWise so ExMerge isn't helpful. I'm talking
about MailMig!
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2002 12:32
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail migration wizard on Windows 2000
I am using the
Will do!
-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 January 2002 23:21
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits
Kevin,
Yes I need it please. Would appreciate, if you could send it to me ?.
Thanks,
Jaspal
-Original
No Kevin I have found that it doesn't work on Win2k, so ended up using a NT
W/K.
No - I am not sure if there is one.
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2002 13:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail migration wizard on
...and an additional information source:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/55/1018.asp
Ricki
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. Januar 2002 11:30
An: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Betreff: RE: Error 1018
What
Kevin,
I wouldn't mind too.
Many thanks,
Hanief
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2002 13:19
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits
Will do!
-Original Message-
From: Bansal, Jaspal
Do you migrate to Ex55?
I only know about these (coming with SP4):
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/55/migrationwizard.asp
and
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/TechNet/prodtechn
ol/exchange/downloads/migwiz.asp
But neither tells you on what OS it's working!
Title: RE: Public folder limits
Oh yes, ,please send that along
-Original Message-
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 7:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits
Will do!
-Original Message-
Title: Message
Our
cluster actually corrupted our Priv.edb TWICE
-Original Message-From: Gerald BAI (NCS)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 3:02
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Clustering
Exchange
Hi, may I have the article no, if
Ouch.
I would use an Outlook session into the GW store for each user right
before you plan on running the migration so that you have a good copy of
each mailbox.
Depending on the number of users, you are going to have a great time.
NOT.
John Weber
Consultant
Centerlogic
503-262-0490 x203
Title: RE: Exchange 5.0 server acting as an open relay
The
IMC in Exchange5.0 doesn't cover all the possibilities, especially ESMTP.
I believe you actually need Exchange5.5 sp2 before you can even prevent
relay.
William
-Original Message-From: NIC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Well, since it's being passed along to everyone, send it on up this way.
Pretty Please.
-Original Message-
From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Public folder limits
Oh yes, ,please send that
The application log keeps filling up with this event 13004 :
Logon attempt from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx has failed: AcceptSecurityContext()
call failed with error Access Denied. The only Q article on MS site has to
do with Windows CE accessing the POP server. We don't have any CE devices
logging in.
Title: RE: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 13004
We have several engineers who run Sun stations in our environment and access their e-mail via Netscape (don't ask me, they just do). When their domain password expires the Netscape account cannot login until the cached password has been updated (I know,
Once in a while, people are getting the little pop-up box in Outlook when
they are opening mail with attachments: Requesting data from Exchange
server. Is this normal, or is there something odd ocurring? It only
started happening after I did an exmerge. Thanks for the replies.
Steve
Steve
Title: Message
After looking on
Microsofts web site for a while I couldnt find a Q article. All I know is that we were told that by
Microsoft. Perhaps you could check
with them
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics
Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy
It is normal. I assume you are using OLXP?
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Requesting Data from Exchange Server
Once in a while, people are getting the little pop-up box in
OK, got the bad news from Microsoft. Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA. Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in? In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.
If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
Its as simple as that.
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA usage
OK, got the
Is that the Microsoft solution? Just buy two CAL's for every user, one for
work, one for home?
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, one CAL per user.
You're thinking of Oracle... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage
Is that the Microsoft
I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain them correctly.
You need a CAL for every person that is accessing the Exchange server. That
CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or OWA.
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar
We had this discussion with Corpsoft shortly before a threatened audit by
Microsoft and their position on Exchange licensing is that you don't need a
CAL for every user, but every computer that accesses 5.5 Exchange. Hence,
if 3 people share one computer, only 1 CAL required. That being the
Unfortunately, based on MS Website, that actually sounds accurate. Take a
look here. It basically says that every single device that is used to
access Exchange must have a CAL, as long as it must authenticate.
http://www.microsoft.com/PIRACY/samguide/tools/cal_guide/exchange.asp
Ben Winzenz,
Disclaimer: This is only opinion.
I would argue vehemently. It is my understanding, one CAL per user/mailbox.
No CAL's for resource boxes.
The employee does not access from home and from the office at the same time.
Or, if that is the case, the server running OWA is the only 'computer'
Title: RE: OWA usage
If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
Its as simple as that.
I think his question is How does I stop the folks who *do* have a mailbox, but for whom I don't have an OWA CAL? Other than trusting them not to?.
-Original Message-
From: Ropiak
Title: RE: OWA usage
I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain them
correctly.
You need a CAL for every person that is accessing the
Exchange server. That
CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or OWA.
Not every person; every computer. If I access at
Title: RE: OWA usage
Create
a group called NOOWA and deny local login rights to the OWA server to its
members. Just a thought.
There
are many other means, like restricting HTTP.
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002
10:48
That's a feature of Outlook 2002. It can be turned off in Options.
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Title: RE: OWA usage
That
is my understanding. I emailed Corpsoft for clarification. They
handle our licensing issues.
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197
cell [EMAIL
Title: Message
My boss
has his Microsoft Outlook 98mail setup on his
Laptop-win98.
We run
Exchange 5.5 sp 3 on NT 4.0 sp6.
He went
on a trip with his Laptop whilst expecting a mail and wantedit checked
for him in the office on phone.
I logon
to an NT workstation with his id and created
hehe.. set all their mailboxes to anonymouse access..
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2002 08:47
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage
Unfortunately, based on MS Website, that actually sounds accurate. Take a
look
Title: Message
You
created a profile with what services? In what mode? Is his email now
in a pst file on that workstation?
William
-Original Message-From: Martey, Emmanuel E
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:34
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject:
I learn something new here every day.
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Requesting Data from Exchange Server
That's a feature of Outlook 2002. It can be turned off
Where in the options did you find it? I haven't yet.
Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
-Original Message-
From: Lathrum Matt-P55173 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Requesting
Title: RE: Block attachments in Exchange 2000
Antigen
http://www.sybari.com Ask for David Darm and tell him I sent you (Need more t-shirts). Save yourself time by not looking around. You may find a product as good as Antigen- you won't find one better.
-Original Message-
From:
All Exchange 2000 environment with latest updates applied, Native Windows 2k
domain with latest updates as well.
My domain name is penncolor.com so Exchange is installed as penncolor.com
Currently we use an external ISP to handle mail for our domain so our mx
record for penncolor.com points to
Hello everyone,
I have a user who can send and receive mail outside of the company just
fine. The problem is she can only receive messages over the net if the
other person replies to her original email(for example I tried creating a
new message from my hotmail account and sending it to her and
Title: RE: OWA usage
That
would only fix half of the problem.
A
single OWA-enabled user can access his OWA accountfrom any
Internet-connected PC in the world!
I'd
*hate* to pay MS for that many CALs... :-)
/\/iels
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL
Title: RE: OWA usage
There has to be some type of consideration
given to OWA users. As others have mentioned, I always "thought"
that you did not need a separate CAL for OWA if you already had one for that users work
machine/mailbox. You may want to speak to your vendor again and bring
Title: Message
Everyone see
Q168633
-Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002
1:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA
usage
There has to be some
type of consideration given to OWA users. As
I just want to mention that I think this licensing scheme sounds really
dumb, and also that I am not authorized to quote MS licensing, but this is
some info from their site. The Q article you sent is talking about NT
Server CAL's and whether or not they are needed. In addition to a NT CAL,
they
The licensing and its manifestations over the years has left much to be
desired.
A couple of things ring true:
1) get licensing and pricing from vendors in writing
2) if you do not like the interperation of one vendor, try another ;)
William
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
Can the ADC be used on an NT 4.0 machine that is running Exchange 5.5?
Thanks,
Karen
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Is there a way to break into Personal Folders in Outlook if a user cannot
remember their password at all? I appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Ack, I don't remember, sorry. I only use Outlook 2002 at home. Check the help files?
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Winzenz
They put it there so people didn't think their Outlook client wasn't hung while it was
waiting for MAPI calls or data to return. It's supposed to be a feature :)
--
Matt Lathrum
General Dynamics Decision Systems
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf
http://www.exchangefaq.org/security/0004.php3
William
-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: outlook personal folders
Is there a way to break into Personal Folders in Outlook if
Title: RE: outlook personal folders
There is utility available on http://www.elcomsoft.com/aolpr.html
Advanced Outlook Password Recovery
This program (Advanced Outlook Password Recovery, or simply AOLPR) can be used to recover passwords to protected Personal Storage Files (*.pst) used
Nope, needs to be installed on a win2k box.
--Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
Did I just say that out loud?
-Original Message-
From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:35 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: active directory connector
Add an SMTP connector that catches all of the email for this domain, and
have it forward to the ISP, that might work? I am sure there is a better
way, but this a busy day for me.
Or give those users a different email address, make your own MX record
in your DNS server that points to the isp.
Title: Message
Not as
good as this one, though, eh?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;FR;q235450
William
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002
5:59 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Title: Message
That's
your favorite.
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January
21, 2002 5:55 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Not
as good as this one, though, eh?
Title: Message
Only
today.
Tomorrow I'll revert to the greyhaired icon and the password of
1,512,435,659,022 characters.
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002
6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Title: Message
1,512,435,659,022
characters is da
bomb!
-Original Message-From: Lefkovics,
William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January
21, 2002 6:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
License Question
Only
today.
Tomorrow I'll revert to
Title: Message
Here
is another important one
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q148810
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:05 PMTo:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
1,512,435,659,022
Hey, that sounds like a dream I had..
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
301-610-9584 voice
240-465-0323 Efax
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems
We have the same situation at the University with two mail servers.
1) On the recipients policy uncheck the box that says This Exchange
Organization is responsible for all mail for this Domain
If it is the primary address on the Default Policy the box will be grayed. In
that case make another
Title: Message
Speaking of important articles, does
anyone have a copy of the Msexchange article: Q259895 XADM: List of Performance Counters Added by Squeaky
Lobster? Microsoft took it out of the kb database for some unknown
reason.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone
Title: Message
www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/
Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
Thats
about the best I can do...Well, not the best
-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:
Title: Message
http://www.mstp.quantico.usmc.mil/classes/techClasses/exchange%205.5/Read%20Ahead%20Info/Exchange%20Tools/Optimization%20and%20Tuning.doc
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:01 PMTo:
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE:
Title: Message
You
call that help? You should be working for NAI.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,
January 21, 2002 8:04 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Title: Message
Then
could I call on you at CA?
-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:12
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
You
call that help? You should be working for NAI.
Title: Message
I
deserved that.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday,
January 21, 2002 8:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin
IssuesSubject: RE: License Question
Then
could I call on you at CA?
-Original
Title: Message
Lets
not fight...
-Original Message-From: Jennifer Baker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:20
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License
Question
I
deserved that.
-Original Message-From: Martin
Howdy...
I am trying to set up an in-house messaging system using MSN 4.6. I have
downloaded the client, I can log on successfully and I can see when others
are online both internally and externally, but I send any internal messages.
I get a message could not be delivered. I must be missing
69 matches
Mail list logo
