Turns out it is a Trojan:Exploit:Win32/CVE-2009-3129, at least thats what
the antivirus said (the one running on Exchange) the one on the local
computer hasnt seen anything...
Still dont get how this email could have been sent without the user knowing
it.
the user is alone in his office so he's
We had something similar a while ago and it was a worm on the users
machine. It had both McAfee and Spysweeper and they found nothing . I
never did track it down completely. If you run something like
MailSweeper set it to quarantine his outgoing. Getting off the black
lists took days. The one we
Thats the puzzling thing, I can't see any attempt in the SMTP logs to
send anything to the server shown in the Routing Group connector, and I
can't see any way to see where it is trying to send the messages too.The
retry count is going up so t is trying to send them somewhere
Dave Wade
Full backup ran this morning and still getting the same issue (logs were
definitely truncated). If I've got any free PSS calls left over from a Technet
subscription I'll open a case, this is really infuriating. Unless you don't
think we'll be charged :)
Richard
From:
Thanks, that was really buried.
From: David [mailto:blazer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Connection, recipient, sender ID and Filtering question
Oh, and have a look at
I asked again and was told, flat out, by an escalation engineer that this
should not happen. So...you should be safe to open a case and request a
non-dec. Ensure that the problem description is not just to get you back up
and running but also resolve this so it doesn't happen in the future.
Thanks MBS. I'll think I'll do just that. This is a problem that's happened in
the past when I was experimenting so it'd be good to see if fixed.
Appreciate all the advice.
Richard
From: bounce-9334700-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Not to keep the bash train rolling, but.
We migrated a daughter company at my last gig to Postini, consisting of
~200 users. Once we found out they either lied or left out important
info regarding services supported/not supported, we cancelled the
migration of our parent company (4000+
malwarebytes, vipre live and ubcd4win are your friends.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:50, Al Rose arose...@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out it is a Trojan:Exploit:Win32/CVE-2009-3129, at least thats what
the antivirus said (the one running on Exchange) the one on the local
computer hasnt seen
On the exchange 2010 side, do you see any connection attempts in the connection
log?
On the 2003 side, do you have a smarthost specified? If so, where (virtual
server or smtp connector)?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Dave Wade
Just for my information - like what?
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 10:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Update Rollup 3-v2 for Ex2k7 SP 3
I had to move some things around in my exchange setup, I was having issues
with free/busy info and OOF, this is fixed now. Now I am diagnosing speed
issues, and calandar sharing thru outlook which is slow and not working. Can
find anything on web relating to this issue. Anyone have ideas?
On checking there is a smart host on 2003 on the Virtual Server.
On 2010 I don't seem to have any receive logs at all.
I presume I need to remove the Smart host?
Dave Wade
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 13 May
Smart host should exist in an smtp connector on the 2003 side, not the virtual
server. If there isn't an smtp connector, you need to create one.
Regards,
Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk]
Sent:
Sh!t,
I meant no problems... I didn't even notice that, sorry guys (That was
careless).
jlc
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 9:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Update Rollup 3-v2 for Ex2k7 SP 3
Just for my information - like what?
Yes there is an SMTP connector with a scope of *, I'll try dropping
the smart host from SMTP Virtual Server.
Dave Wade
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 13 May 2011 16:46
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Did you make sure you captured DCs with the FSMO roles you need. Not
sure what changes to AD installing a server with the /DR switch needs to
make, but if its altering the configuration container and you don't have
the infrastructure master role configured then things will most likely
cause
Company A - Exchange 2003 with Barracuda
Company B - Exchange 2003 SBS relying on connection filter black lists.
A owns B and has VPN connection between. A would like to change B's MX
to point to A's Barracuda for better spam/virus filtering, then have
Barracuda deliver mail directly to B's
How about: just setup each companies internal DNS zone with each other
and let it route mail by MX record? Since they are part of the same
company and connected by VPN anyway, you might have some other benefits
as well linking DNS.
Bill
N Parr wrote:
Company A - Exchange 2003 with
I guess that would work, I really don't want full DNS resolution between
us because I don't trust their computers to be 100% clean. The VPN
Tunnel exists between us but B is limited as to the resources it can see
on A. I suppose I could just do it one way so Company A's mail to B
will route
Ignore what I said if you don't want to share other resources. I don't
think you need to do anything really...just make sure you have an
internal A record in your DNS for whatever the MX record is and the mail
shouldn't ever loop out to the internet.
Bill
N Parr wrote:
I guess that would
21 matches
Mail list logo
